I don't care what they call this man. He is a terrorist and he is part of our military. I'm getting sick and tired of the left wing telling us what is politically correct. Yet again another Muslim Jihad terrorist attacked this country in the name of Allah. While Obama bows to Muslim Kings and tells the world we are not a Christian nation but one of the largest Muslim nations Barack Hussein Obama wont look at Islamic terrorist. But he calls Veterans,pro life etc...right wing extreemists. Why wont the media call this man a terrorist when it is as plan as the nose on my face that he is. As we heard Barack Hussein Obama give a shout out that renched most Americans guts lets start asking why are the left so friendly and accepting of Muslim terrorists and radicals?
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Is This Man A Jihad Terrorist Or Just Crazy?
I don't care what they call this man. He is a terrorist and he is part of our military. I'm getting sick and tired of the left wing telling us what is politically correct. Yet again another Muslim Jihad terrorist attacked this country in the name of Allah. While Obama bows to Muslim Kings and tells the world we are not a Christian nation but one of the largest Muslim nations Barack Hussein Obama wont look at Islamic terrorist. But he calls Veterans,pro life etc...right wing extreemists. Why wont the media call this man a terrorist when it is as plan as the nose on my face that he is. As we heard Barack Hussein Obama give a shout out that renched most Americans guts lets start asking why are the left so friendly and accepting of Muslim terrorists and radicals?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is that what Bruce looks like?! He looks different, a little slimmer than I thought he would.
ReplyDeleteYou are so dumb john. That is the crazy guy that killed all those soldiers at Fort Hood. They should have found out about Hasan under bush's watch. Once again this is proven to be all bush's fault. John you are one of the dumbest Reps. I've ever read.
ReplyDeleteChris - we agree - he is a terrorist by my definition also. However, there are so many as of yet, unexplained questions. Did he always have this view? Was he "driven" to commit this insane act by intolerance? Why after all these years of preparation and consequences of 9/11 did authorities miss the boat on him?
ReplyDeleteRegarding did he always have this view? Who Cares he KILLED Military Personnel!
ReplyDeleteRegarding was he driven to commit this insane act? Who Cares he KILLED Military Personnel!
Regarding authorities Missing the BOAT on him?
Yes they did ,they should be PUNISHED and POLITICAL CORRECTNESS should be declared a Crime!
All above Questions are EXCUSES,Hes a TERRORIST Period NO EXCUSES PLEASE!
To the NoN Thinker who Blames BUSH,Get a LIFE and maybe a FREIND!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
ReplyDeleteObama sure is quick to jump to conclusions when it involves men in blue and his arrogant marxist professor buddy, but when it comes to an EVIL muslim terrorist who wants to kill Americans and Jews and non believers and views women as the equals of dogs he wants to with hold judgement and not jump to conclusions!
ReplyDeleteThat man makes me ill!
Al, it must be nice to live in your black and white world.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting too, that the FBI is charging him with 13 counts of premeditated murder, no charges concerning terrorism.
But I know none of the American Taliban want to be bothered with facts.
Under what definition are you saying he's a terrorist? Where is the plot, Al? There has been no mention of co-conspirators that I've hear, except maybe on Fox "News," you know, the network that just apologized to Jon Stewart for conflating footage from 9/12 with footage from Michelle Bachman's "press conference." Do they still have any credibility left? I don't think so.
Hey teabaggie Fealk. It was a terrorist act. Yelling "Allahu akbar" before he started shooting is the trademark Islamic terrorist act. Shooting 45 people is a terrorist act.
ReplyDeleteCommunicating with a person in Yemen with ties to al Qaeda is not a normal thing to do.
The FBI is not charging anything, he is being tried in a military court.
I heard more outrage from you over the murder of Tiller the baby killer than the 13 people killed at Ft. Hood. Maybe because of your dislike of the military.
Craven - it must be nice to see the world in such black and white perspectives. We may think of this act as being a terrorist act - but the fact that he is being tried in a military court under the UCMJ for murder says otherwise. Smarter people than you or I have determined that from a legal standpoint, it is a case of murder - not terrorism.
ReplyDeleteCraven, in this country you need evidence and a trial to prove anything, at least you used to when I was growing up, until the American Taliban, most of the commenters on this blog and other far right blogs showed up on the scene.
ReplyDeleteI'm not defending the guy, mind you, but we still have courts of law in this country that operate on the premise of innocent until proven guilty. Maybe you should wait until a jury convicts him until you proclaim to know all the facts.
Why are you so un-American, Craven?
You might want to listen to a lawyer on the topic.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEDV04tpNfw
Would it have made a difference if Hasan used bombs insead of bullets? They have no problem charging someone with intent of hate for a hate crime but when a Muslim is involved the media and the President turn into yellow bitches. This same President that had none of the facts insinuated that a white officer was acting with a racial motive on his black friend. You on the left are more sensative to the Dr.Tillers,Muslim terrorist and inprisoned murders then you are of inocent babies and the military. And that includes Barack Hussein Obama the leader of the American Talaban. The left are affraid of Islam. Our President should be affraid of Islam since he was Muslim but is now kind of a Christian. Did Barack HUSSEIN Obama ever denounce his Muslim faith? I'm not saying he's a Muslim the Muslims are though. They say he never denounce Islam and he is still a Muslim hiding as a Christian in America.
ReplyDeleteBruce if a person kills someone they are chared with murder,right? Now if it is found out that the intent was a hate crime or terrorism then they can be found guilty or not of said crime also. He murdered 14 people including the baby. That is true but not the whole truth. I just think it is funny how the media like Maddow hide from the fact that it might be, and everything points to the fact that it is, a jihad terrorist attack. Why aren't they talking about the FACT that he screamed "ALLAH AHKBAR",was in contact with a Yemin terrorist network,told numerous fellow soldiers he hated America and the war? Why did he have a big problem fighting in a war that killed Islkamic terrorist but he had no problem killing Americans without guns? Why would it make a difference if he used a gun or a bomb,like McVey did? It is so obvious the amount of protection you give these true terrorists and you call the conservatives and veterans of this country extreeemists. I think I know who you think are the real enemies of this country and it ain't the Jihadists.
ReplyDeleteIf Hasan was a Christian the liberals would be all over him as a right wing terrorist. Just look at what they call the Tea Party Protesters. They can't call a real terrorist a terrorist but a right wing protester is attacked with zealous. Bruce and his liberal Taliban klan are all hypocrits. They see things in black and white with conservative ideas. While they live a life of pink and purple liberal ideas. Just look at some of the sick things Bruce said and did about Bush and all Republicans. He would sooner see one of his kids be a murder then a Republican. And one of his daughters is conservative. Everyone has just learned to pat Bruce on the head and tell him he is right just to shut him up.
ReplyDeleteWhen did you need CONSPIRATORS to be a TERRORIST?
ReplyDeleteListen to LAWYERS,thats a Great IDEA MAYBE the ACLU!
MILITARY court MARTIAL not the Federal Courts will decide this TERRORIST fate and we will see the EVIDENCE. ASK the VICTIMS families wheather or not this was a TERRORIST attack!
After this TERRORIST is CONFICTED and he will be might be GOOD thought to send him to ALA with the WEAPONS he USED!Not POLITICALLY CORRECT but JUST!
A week after a Muslim jihadi gunned down more than 40 fellow citizens at Ft. Hood, Texas, America’s national security leadership still won’t admit that the attack had anything to do with Islam. By failing to acknowledge that connection, those with a constitutional duty to defend this nation “against all enemies foreign and domestic” consistently substitute a policy of political correctness at the expense of military readiness. The fact is that the 5 November 2009 attack that took the lives of thirteen American patriots was not just an act of terrorism: it was an act of war. When a gunman from the ranks of Islamic Jihad mounts an armed assault against a military target in complete consistency with the enemy doctrine of war, it is time to recognize that the U.S. actually is at war -- not just in Afghanistan or Iraq, but with all those who follow the call of Jihad. These are the Jihad Wars and the stakes are clear: shall Americans live in security under the Constitution or shall the enemy within and without compel us to submit to Shari’a (Islamic law)?
ReplyDeleteThe few courageous commentators, like Colonel Ralph Peters, Bill O’Reilly, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), who dare to notice that U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was born and raised a Muslim, yelled “Allahu Akbar (“God is the greatest”) while shooting people in the back, and sought Islamic fatwas from American-born Yemeni al-Qa’eda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki (who’d been his imam at the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia), have been ignored. Hasan told colleagues, "I'm a Muslim first and an American second." He proselytized his psychiatric patients, many with PTSD, trying to convert them to Islam -- and they complained about it. He gave a Power Point presentation while at the military’s Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences entitled ‘Why the War on Terror is a War on Islam" in which a classmate says he “justified suicide bombing" and spewed "anti-American propaganda.”
The Army knew about all of this. Further, the 9/11 Commission, Congress, and the FBI had all focused on al-Awlaki’s links to al-Qa’eda eight year ago. DIA issued an internal report in 2003 warning that Muslim soldiers in the U.S. military pose a possible security threat after Sgt. Hasan Akbar, a Muslim convert, killed two and wounded 15 others at a military camp outside Baghdad.
But in the days since the Ft. Hood massacre, U.S. Army Chief of Staff General George Casey has appeared more worried about the possibility that diversity in the military could become “a casualty” than he has about his constitutional duty to ensure force protection within the ranks of this country’s military, unit cohesion, and readiness to defeat this nation’s enemies. The reality that Maj. Hasan and Sgt. Akbar should alert us to is that some of those enemies are already inside the gates. They do not wear an enemy uniform or fight within the bounds of the Geneva Convention code. They pose as loyal Americans but render their true allegiance to Islam and Shari’a.
We know from the Muslim Brotherhood’s own internal documents that the strategy of Islamic Jihad includes “destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands….” In other words, the strategy of our sworn enemies is designed to get us to wreck our own country with our own hands, from within our own society. Gen. Casey and all the rest of our national security leadership are responsible for knowing this, for knowing that our military has been penetrated by enemy soldiers such as Hasan, and for establishing a successful defense plan that identifies and excises them out of the Army before they do what Akbar and Hasan have done.
continued:
ReplyDeleteThis is not to say that either Akbar or Hasan is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood; but, from their words and deeds, we do know that they hold the same ideological beliefs as the Brotherhood, al-Qa’eda, and all who seek the dual objectives of a new Caliphate and worldwide enforcement of Shari’a. Hasan may or may not be found to have direct links to recognized Islamic terror organizations. This needs to be investigated, but should not distract us from the increasing prevalence of the individual jihadi. Under Islamic law, in the absence of a Caliph, it is the duty of every Muslim to wage individual jihad (or fard ayn) against the enemy if any part of Muslim lands is occupied by non-Muslim soldiers. That jihad may be by the sword, the pen, or the purse -- and in fact, is all of those. The ultimate objective is still the same: subjugation of the entire world to a supremacist Islamic ideology.
When President Obama expressed the sentiment at the Ft. Hood commemorative ceremony that “no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor," he showed that he either does not consider Islam a genuine faith (hardly likely) -- or, he has no idea what is contained in the Qur’an, ahadith, and Sunna. But Hasan certainly does know that the Qur’an commands him and all Muslims: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and his apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth, even if they be of the People of the Book [Christians and Jews], until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Q 9:29) Shouldn’t the commander in chief of the U.S. military know it too?
Given what the Army chain of command and other federal investigators surely do know and have known about Hasan, his expressed beliefs, and declared loyalties, there is no reason the murderous assault at Ft. Hood should have occurred. When the official blinders and earplugs are removed, jihadis like Hasan self-identify to any with the will to understand. His motives were expressed loudly and clearly many years ago, but just as declarations of war by al-Qa’eda and the Muslim Brotherhood, have been willfully ignored.
Unless an investigation such as called for by Lieberman, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, can jolt our national security leadership out of its suicidal reluctance to name the enemy and pursue him wherever he may be found, the brave members of the U.S. military will remain in mortal peril, not only on foreign battlefields, but right here at home on American soil. And if the U.S. Army cannot even defend its own -- against its own -- then how can it defend the rest of us?
Lets see,your on an airplane drunk and cause a scene. The pilot radios ground control who in turn calls the F.B.I. The pilot turns the plane around and then lands (no one harmed). You are immediately removed from the plane and charged with criminal TERRORIST charges.
ReplyDeleteShoot-up an Army base killing 13 (setting aside the radical imam,calls overseas to terror cells,direct conversations with at least 1 of the 9-11 hijackers,warnings by many ON BASE of his radical islamic extremeist views) and this will be called PTSD even though he was never deployed.
CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE??????
Hi Gavin; I'm not a Republican... nor a Representative, if that's what you meant by "Reps.", but thanks for the compliment. I might be one of the dumbest you have ever read, but that still puts me far and away smarter than any liberal or Democrat. A fact that I prove each and every day as I rub Bruce Fealk and vomamike's noses in their own stupidity and hypocrisy. So sit back and enjoy Gavin!
ReplyDeleteChris, the real enemies of this country are people like you, frankly, and the rest of the American Taliban.
ReplyDeleteBruce - Is that supposed to be an insult calling people you disagree with "Taliban"? Because, as I recall, about a month ago Obama was calling the Taliban our allies in containing Afghanistan. So, hmmmm... must not be that bad. Or if they are, then Obama is that stupid. Or maybe it's just you. That's what I'm going to have to go with on this one.
ReplyDeleteHow is Chris, or anyone like him, an enemy of this country Bruce? I would think that someone like Pelosi, who wants to unconstitutionally force young healthy adults like your daughter to buy health insurance or face fines and jail-time, would rank as an enemy of our country. She certainly is NOT upholding the Constitution of These United States that she swore to uphold.
Then there are people like you Bruce, who care more about this scumball that killed 13 people in cold blood than you do about the victims (most likely you feel that way because it was military that was killed). You are disgustingly anti-American. I really have to question vomamike's "veteran" status if he thinks and behaves the same way that you do.
Bruce, you can call us American Taliban all you want, but then I guess that makes you the Al Qaeda. Not even the American Al Qaeda, just plain Al Qaeda. You want to do away with any facet of the Constitution of These United States of America, and you and your G-20 protesters don't care what you have to do to do it. Even Obama doesn't side with Al Qaeda like he does with the Taliban. Idiot Bruce. How does that make you feel idiot Bruce, that Obama loves the Taliban so much?
Here's an example of Bruce's patriotism: More taxes for everybody!! What a bunch of LYING assholes liberals and Democrats are.
ReplyDeleteHey Bruce, MoveOn is still LYING about their numbers. Wow, you wrote them a letter and EVERYTHING! To think they ignored the GREAT BRUCE FAILK!!! BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA What a turd you are Bruce!
Obama Admin: Cap And Trade Could Cost Families $1,761 A Year
(AP)
The Obama administration has privately concluded that a cap and trade law would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion a year, the equivalent of hiking personal income taxes by about 15 percent.
A previously unreleased analysis prepared by the U.S. Department of Treasury says the total in new taxes would be between $100 billion to $200 billion a year. At the upper end of the administration's estimate, the cost per American household would be an extra $1,761 a year.
A second memorandum, which was prepared for Obama's transition team after the November election, says this about climate change policies: "Economic costs will likely be on the order of 1 percent of GDP, making them equal in scale to all existing environmental regulation."
The documents (PDF) were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute and released on Tuesday.
These disclosures will probably not aid the political prospects of the Democrats' cap and trade bill. The House of Representatives approved it by a remarkably narrow margin in June -- the bill would have failed if only six House members had switched their votes to "no" -- and it faces significant opposition in the Senate.
One reason the bill faces an uncertain future is concern about its cost. House Republican Leader John Boehner has estimated the additional tax bill would be at $366 billion a year, or $3,100 a year per family. Democrats have pointed to estimates from MIT's John Reilly, who put the cost at $800 a year per family, and noted that tax credits to low income households could offset part of the bite. The Heritage Foundation says that, by 2035, "the typical family of four will see its direct energy costs rise by over $1,500 per year."
One difference is that while Heritage's numbers are talking about 26 years in the future, the Treasury Department's figures don't have a time limit.
"Heritage is saying publicly what the administration is saying to itself privately," says Christopher Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute who filed the FOIA request. "It's nice to see they're not spinning each other behind closed doors."
Part 2/2 continued:
ReplyDelete"They're not telling you the cost -- they're not telling you the benefit," says Horner, who wrote the Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming. "If they don't tell you the cost, and they don't tell you the benefit, what are they telling you? They're just talking about global salvation."
The FOIA'd document written by Judson Jaffe, who joined the Treasury Department's Office of Environment and Energy in January 2009, says: "Given the administration's proposal to auction all emission allowances, a cap-and-trade program could generate federal receipts on the order of $100 to $200 billion annually." (Obviously, any final cap-and-trade system may be different from what Obama had proposed, and could yield higher or lower taxes.)
Because personal income tax revenues bring in around $1.37 trillion a year, a $200 billion additional tax would be the equivalent of a 15 percent increase a year. A $100 billion additional tax would represent a 7 or 8 percent increase a year.
One odd point: The document written by Jaffee includes this line: "It will raise energy prices and impose annual costs on the order of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX." The Treasury Department redacted the rest of the sentence with a thick black line.
The Freedom of Information Act, of course, contains no this-might-embarrass-the-president exemption (nor, for that matter, should federal agencies be in the business of possibly suppressing dissenting climate change voices). You'd hope the presidential administration that boasts of being the "most open and transparent in history" would be more forthcoming than this.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA... Oh my good lord, look at what Fealk is up to now. He had to run over to the DailyKos to try to rustle up some help!!! BWAAAAAAAHAHAHA... poor little Brucie!! Here's a CLUE Bruce, nobody is attacking you... well, except maybe MY blog, but certainly Brian and Chris never chased after YOU on their blogs. Yet you accuse THEM of coming after YOU?!?! BWAAAAAHAHAHA!! Hey everybody, look at what a whining loser Bruce Fealk is. This is from October 23rd of THIS year:
ReplyDelete---------------
Well, the story doesn't end there. One of Brian's commenters has started a new blog,www.brucefealkblows.blogspot.com
Brian Pannebecker started a new blog bpannebecker.blogspot.com
which also attacks me on a regular basis
A third blog http://bonsaifromtheright.blogspot.com/bonsaifromtheright.blogspot.com/ another former commenter at Brian's blog has taken up the cause of coming after me.
So, I'm looking for any legal advice on taking this on through a defamation suit or any other advice on how to handle this situation.
Thanks.
And here are a couple of choice replies:
I can't give you any legal advice but I'd be glad to contribute some insults if someone were to start a brianpannebeckerateadogturdinpublic.com
by Atilla the Honey Bunny on Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 02:19:49 PM PST
That sounds like a good idea
by bfealk on Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 02:20:47 PM PST
The attacks are on me (whiiiiiiine!!HAHAHAHA!)
by bfealk on Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 02:36:47 PM PST
So Bruce now I am your enemy along with other conservatives? I bet you think Hasan is a hero don't you Bruce? I'm just waiting for your mind to crack and I will see you on TV doing the same thing a Hasan. Why would you call Americans the enemy and our true enemies our friends? Is it because you hate America and our military? We know you hate Christians and your brother Steve and Sue. You do have a lot of hate in you. Sue is right about you. I bet your family wish you would have a stroke so you would just shut up.
ReplyDeleteHoly smokes that bruce has got to be the biggest maschosist I have ever seen.
ReplyDeleteI think he enjoys getting thumped on.
I really do, I bet as a child he would provoke the others to the point where they would beat him up on the playground.
I wouldnt doubt if he is one of those type that sit in bars drinking and lipping off to the biggest dude in the place until he gets his ass kicked.
Some people are messed up like that
Chris, you're not my enemy, but I believe you and the rest of the American Taliban are the enemy of this nation, along with other terrorists.
ReplyDeleteYou and the rest of the American Taliban, who want others to bow down at their feet and their god, want our government to be run as a religious institution and follow their religious beliefs every bit as much as the Taliban in Afghanistan. Next thing you know you'll be asking women to wear berkas and walk 5 steps behind their husbands.
Come on now Bruce did you get off your meds or something? You can't be thinking what you just said is true. Where in the world today is there a Christian style taliban? There are a lot of Islamic Talibans out there but no Christians. About 76% of this country is Christian and never has there been a time that a Christian said no more. They have turned their cheecks 7 x 77 and now we are standing up for our faith that you on the left want to take out of every aspect of our lives. You on the left are the real Taliban. You take away prayer and God and replace it with images of man. We are bringing this country back to it's pledge. On nation under God. And we will not let your Taliban style tacktics intimidate us like you have used in the past. We are so large and strong that we are going to take away your half hearted term and use it against you. From now on you on the left will be called th AMERICAN TALIBAN. You on the left have dominated over us conservatives for way too long. We will crush the liberal American Taliban and your Mosque of Liberalism and leave you willout a tail to put between your legs when we are done rising from the distruction the liberals have caused over the last 4 years of a liberal Congress and these buffoons Obama/Biden. You better get a lot more of your Liberal Taliban on these blogs because you will crack when we are done with you and your anti-God Liberal Taliban. Bruce do you know what Aikido is? It's using your apponents force(weapons) against them. So come at us Christian conservatives with all you've got, we are ready for it.
ReplyDeleteBruce seems to be stuck in Reverse with a ROAD MAP to NO where!The only person Iv seen BOW in the last several Months was OUR President just after he APOLOGIZED but weakness to some is good so BRUCE you must feel Great!
ReplyDeleteBruce you want to see the ENEMY,look in a MIRROR and as JUDAS said "What have I done"!
Chris, this country was founded on freedom of religion, so Christian Conservatives or the American Taliban, as I will henceforth refer to them, do not get to force their religion down the throats of the rest of America.
ReplyDeleteEven long time Republicans don't seem to be "conservative" enough for you. So, you can take your 20% of America that agrees with your far right wing extremism, and yell and scream all you want. It is not a winning political strategy. In fact, you might want to check out this article to see how endangered you are as a political entity.
The trends are moving away from you big time.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/11/14/804335/-Why-Republicans-Should-Be-Really,-Really,-Really-Scared
When have we Christians forced our religion down you the liberal American Talibans throat? Your neurons just don't fire right do they Bruce. It is you Liberal American Taliban that force us to take on your Mosque of Liberalism religious lifestyle. Once again Bruce it is the liberals that make up 20% of Americans conservatives make up 40% which is the largest demographic in America ahead of moderats. The trend is moving away from liberal and towards conservative and the polls prove it. What do you have other then a far left leaning Taliban style dailykos to back up what you say? Bruce you on the left hate Christians just like the Taliban. You are the minority in the country just like the Taliban. You on the left want us to live by your rules and beliefs and not the other way around, just like the Taliban. You are taking away our God given rights just like the Taliban. You on the left are the American Taliban.
ReplyDeleteChris, how are liberals taking away any of your "rights" Chris? I'm confused.
ReplyDeleteBruce I agree with you! YOU are CONFUSED!
ReplyDeleteChris, what rights do you think that the current administration has taken away from you?
ReplyDeleteYou still have your guns, right?