Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Tea Partier Confronts Wisconsin Dem Who Fled To Illinois (Video)

This is Mark Miller, a Democratic state senator from Wisconsin. He is supposed to uphold the US Constitution and do his job and vote. He must know what he is doing is the lowest thing a state senator could do because he slithered away like the union owned leach he is. The Tea Party is looking for you anti-democracy Democrats. We will confront you and it will get on the news.


Illinois Tea Partier: "Sir, shouldn't you be in Wisconsin fulfilling your Constitutional responsibilities?"...The senator does not want anything to do with the camera. If he was doing something honorable he wouldn't have acted the way he did. These Democrats are pissing on this country,the voters of Wisconsin...and all the people that have given their lives for our freedoms.
 
I can tell you one thing. These Democrats and the Democratic Party as a whole aren't winning over independants and moderates. The Democratic Party base of unions,socialist and anti-government anarchists may be getting moist over these moves the rest of the nation is imbarassed of them. This is going to turn out great for both the Tea Parties and the Republican Party. Who knows maybe a third party might come out of the Democratic Party ashes.
 
All I know is the more people see of these people the less they like them. So keep up the violent rhetoric, fleeing from voting, closing schools and laying off workers because the government had to shut down. I'm sure the parents and taxpayers are happy with the Democratic Party and teachers unions costing them more money.

Teachers Union Big Wig Says It's Not About Kids, It's About Power!

National Education Association’s retiring top lawyer, Bob Chanin, speaking at the NEA’s annual meeting in July, 2009:
“Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.”
“And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.”
“This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing dropout rates, improving teacher quality and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary. These are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights and collective bargaining. That simply is too high a price to pay.”

Read the full story at michellemalkin.com 

This has got to make parents and grandparents feel good knowing that this is who is "teaching" their children. This is just more reason to throw out the unions. Keep the teachers, but throw out the unions.

While this is happening in Wisconsin we have the Democratic Party calling for violence in the streets.
"Sometimes it's necessary to get out in the streets and "get a little bloody," a Massachusetts Democrat said Tuesday in reference to labor battles in Wisconsin.
Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) fired up a group of union members in Boston with a speech urging them to work down in the trenches to fend off limits to workers' rights like those proposed in Wisconsin.
Does that sound like a call to violence? It sure does to me. If there is any violence it will be on the Democratic Parties hands.

Union Racism: Why Aren't Blacks Protesting With Unions?

During a pro-union rally at Colorado’s State Capitol yesterday, some alleged SEIU union supporters got into a shouting match with a black Tea Partier. But the conversation wasn’t just a loud, heated exchange. It got very personal when two union supporters ganged up on the conservative, one of them calling him “uneducated” and another asking him if he has any children “that he claims”:
According to RedWhiteBlueNews.com, the woman in red was later asked what she meant by her comments about the man’s children. “She said the black conservative was such a ‘free spirit’ that she assumed he would possibly not own up to the responsibility of being a father,” the site says.
Just so you know, the man admitted on camera he was gay.
SEIU’s involvement in the protest is supported by a schedule on the union’s website that names Denver, CO as a rally site.
See more videos of the man being heckled at Gateway Pundit.







When was the last time a union member got fired for racism? Unions have a culture of racism that goes way back in it's history to today. The union protects the racist within the unions, making it near imposable for the government or companies to keep the racists fired. See unions not only protect the jobs of those union members that smoke pot on their lunch breaks and come into work rocked out of their minds.
They also protect their members when racist.  We all know what the union does to snitches that tell on their union brothers and sisters.

Watch who get's arrested in the video. Watch the crowed yelling at the big white guy for attacking that Tea Partier. If it wasn't racism then why was the "N"-word used? Take a look at the white guys posture when he gets up and heads towards the guy in the white shirt. The  black Tea Partier and the crowd pointed the two men,one black and the other white SEIU members out to the police. The police put cuffs on both those men. But for some reason I've been accused of lieing about the fact that this attack was race based.

But the left only see the fact that the white SEIU member feel down and stopped watching the rest of the video. Calling me a liar doesn't make it true.

Maybe someone should look into the teachers unions trying to push race based classes and race based testing in our government run schools. Or maybe someone should look at why black children do so poorly on tests and graduation rates. Could there be a form of institutional racism within the way black children are taught vs Asian and white kids? I'm not saying that this is the case of why some races do better then other with government education. But the fact is black children in government/teachers union schools do much worse then private and parochial  schools. Just maybe policy and pre-judging based on race has something to do with it. Maybe the unions and the government has lower expectations based on race. I do know race is very important to the government schools because they send home a RACE AND ETHNICITY survey home for all parents to fill out. I ask you what use does race have in educating our children?