Monday, April 19, 2010

Today Is The 15 Anniversary Of The Oaklahoma Bombing

Today is the anniversary of the Oaklahoma bombing. The rest of the year is for all the liberals that blew stuff up. In fact tomorrow should be Weather Underground bombings day as both Bill Ahers and Jeff Jones are very close to or in this Presidents admin.  So today we need to remember the one time a conservative acted like a liberal. I pray it never happens again.

28 comments:

  1. How Slick Willie Exploited Oklahoma City

    When the obamunist lackeys who run the media attempt to paint Tea Partiers as potentially violent — despite the only violence coming from the left — they are implementing a strategy Dick Morris devised for their moral paragon Bill Clinton in the immediate aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing:

    Morris told Clinton that "direct accusations" of extremism wouldn't work because the Republicans were not, in fact, extremists. Rather, Morris recommended what he called the "ricochet theory." Clinton would "stimulate national concern over extremism and terror," and then, "when issue is at top of national agenda, suspicion naturally gravitates to Republicans." As that happened, Morris recommended, Clinton would use his executive authority to impose "intrusive" measures against so-called extremist groups. Clinton would explain that such intrusive measures were necessary to prevent future violence, knowing that his actions would, Morris wrote, "provoke outrage by extremist groups who will write their local Republican congressmen." Then, if members of Congress complained, that would "link right-wing of the party to extremist groups." The net effect, Morris concluded, would be "self-inflicted linkage between [GOP] and extremists."

    Clinton's proposals — for example, new limits on firearms and some explosives that were opposed by the National Rifle Association — had "an underlying political purpose," Morris wrote…

    The updated version makes use of Comrade Obama's trump card, his skin color. This is why Dem Congresscrumbs attack their opposition by telling lies about having been called the forbidden N-word, why the farcical Department of Homeland Security is watching vets instead of Muslims, and why the Second Amendment will be coming under renewed fire.

    Remember when the black guy showed up with an AR-15 at a Phoenix Tea Party, and the statist liars at MSNBC cropped out his skin color while screeching about racist violence? All part of the unfolding strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. William Jefferson Clinton Used Military Troops Against Civilians In Waco! Now Preaches Tea Party is a Danger! Wonder What He Means By "IS"?

    Any Body Know How Many Great Presidents Had Their Law Licence Taken Away For Lying? Just Wondering.

    Well At Least With Ahers Being a Buddy Of Nobamas, Nobama Should Have Idea What Bomber Looks Like!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Moonbat Astroturf

    As Ann Coulter has observed, you can easily determine what Democrats are furtively up to — it's whatever they're accusing patriots of doing. When the Tea Party phenomenon first began to explode, Nasty Pelousy and others denounced it as astroturf — an astonishing lie, considering that there has never been a more genuine mass grassroots movement. You could only conclude that our moonbat rulers would soon be caught astroturfing themselves. Sure enough:

    Writing on January 15, 2010, Glenn Greenwald at Salon noted Barack Obama's new head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein, had championed creating fake websites and using outside 501(c)(3) interest groups to act as alleged independent champions of government policy and to "cognitively infiltrate" opposition websites, etc.

    In other words, Cass Sunstein has favored the government using outside parties as government propaganda agents to paint their opposition as fringe and undermine their credibility. Kind of like what has been happening with the tea party movement — lots of SEIU members pretending to be tea party activists causing violence in front of TV cameras.

    Sunstein advocates that the Government's stealth infiltration should be accomplished by sending covert agents into "chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups." He also proposes that the Government make secret payments to so-called "independent" credible voices to bolster the Government's messaging.

    Considering Sustein's recommendations, it is not far removed to speculate the Obama administration is behind a new anti-tea party website called The Other 95, which defends the government from tea party criticisms and attacks the tea party movement as fringe.
    The website purports to be authentically grassroots, though one must wonder when the last time was any grassroots activist took the time to defend the government.

    Unsurprisingly, the site's designer is affiliated with Moveon.org, which is bankrolled by ultra-left astroturf magnate George Soros.

    Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery. Tea Parties are astroturf. Obamunism is genuine.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, thanks for the "Blame Clinton" blasts. It goes to show ya how hypocritical the right can be. I'll remember that the next time i'm told i'm blaming Bush.

    Al, I see your Hooterville mayoral re-election campaign is flying. Good luck. All it takes is one mention of Timmy McVeigh and out comes the Waco freak in ya. Funny how rightwing wackjobs think alike.

    Tim McVeigh Waco= Ok city bombing
    Al Ok City Bombing= Waco


    flip, you might want to check out the politico article about the Tea Party Express and look into the Sarah Scaife Foundation.

    And this coming from someone who supported an Admin who made fake news for the networks to use. Lol the irony is amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joe You Gotta Calm Down. That Train Your Riding To Hootervilee Is Begining To Effect Your BLOG!
    Just Pointing Out As You Always Do That Theres Two sides To a Coin! Clinton Spreading Fear About Tea Party and It Was His Administration That Went After Civilians With Military. Thats A Fact Joe So Calm Down Enjoy Your Ride Back To Hooterville!

    You Forgot To Respond To "Ahers" Being Close To Current Regime. I Know Thats a Oversite So You Enjoy That Return Trip! Once Again Thanks For That Tune!

    You Gotta Admit Joe With Crazy Like Mc Veigh That Your Equation Might Be Closer Than You Think. So Many Victims!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Clinton did exploit OK City. And he's still trying to exploit it. He has no shame. No liberal does. And I don't see where Al is wrong in anything he writes. Which is why you have to put words in his mouth and twist it to something it isn't. Typical liberal yet again. Your tripe can be seen coming a mile away.

    I could care less about the TPE. You seem to be obsessed with it, doesnt mean anyone else is. I believe the others addressed your story quite thoroughly. You want to go over it again? Then maybe you might feel like resurrecting the story about Bruce Fealk telling blatant lies? Or about Ayers, as Al mentioned?

    And I don't support this Obama regime "administration"; I assume that is the administration you are talking about making fake news, per the above article.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This guy sounds just like what I imagine Bruce Fealk and the rest of the liberal loons sound like:

    AUDIO: Inside the Mind of a Tea Party Provocateur
    by Bob McCarty

    Today, for the first time, I share three and a half minutes of uncut audio of a phone conversation I had Friday morning with Steve Belosi, one of two “party crashers” who cited free speech as his justification for interrupting speakers at the recent Tax Day Tea Party in downtown St. Charles, Mo. Truly, this recording takes you inside the mind of this tea party provocateur who represents the local embodiment of the Left’s “Crash the Tea Party” effort. [Warning: Graphic Language].

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czVnduNberA&feature=player_embedded

    FYI: In case you’re wondering, the conversation ended when I told Belosi my name and ended the call. Rather than end with that, I merely inserted my tagline and music to close.

    http://bobmccarty.com/2010/04/17/missouri-tea-party-provocateur-spills-beans/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lieberman's Committee SUBPOENAS Obama Administration Over Fort Hood Shooting, Alleging Cover-Up

    WASHINGTON — In a rare public dispute between a Democratic-led Congress and the White House, a Senate committee on Monday subpoenaed the Obama administration for secret documents and access to witnesses in last year's mass shooting at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/19/liebermans-committee-subp_n_543722.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wonder if the TPE PAC is paying for fines for their members, like Dirty Charlie Rangel's campaign committee does. Better start worrying about people in power, not people who aren't:

    You've got to love all this transparency washing over America, enveloping us with the kind of good government and openness we've all been clamoring for. Makes you wonder what those crazy Tea Partiers are all upset about. I mean, it's not as if some high-ranking Democrat secretly pays a fine three months ago and we only find out about it now. And he refuses to say what the fine was for.
    In the latest mess involving Rep. Charlie Rangel’s (D) finances, the former Ways and Means chairman’s campaign committee paid $26,000 in fines to New York City on Jan. 19.

    What could possibly lead to such a massive sum? Rangel’s office isn’t saying.

    “These payments were made in full compliance with FEC rules,” said a spokesman for Rangel, who declined to comment further.

    Rangel’s campaign finance report merely lists the payment as being for “fines.”

    Rangel, who gave up his Ways and Means gavel last month, faces a host of ethical troubles, including inquiries into his procurement of multiple rent-stabilized apartments in New York.

    Rangel gave up one of those apartments, which he used as a campaign office, in 2008 following stories in the New York Times.

    The veteran lawmaker has paid parking tickets out of his campaign account in the past, but those payments were for much smaller amounts.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Flipper Thanks For The Pick Me Up! Sometimes Joe Takes on A Bruce Type Personality and Thats When The Fun Begins!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Old ass-wipe, aka Bruce Fealk, is at it again. Always trying to operate on someone else's dime, he is promoting his soon to be defunct online newspaper on the Rochester Downtown Development Authority Facebook page and riled up the community.

    Councilman Ben Giovanelli, who also sits on the DDA board, sent a message to the DDA board members and staff summarizing the council discussion and asked that all content from Fealk be removed from the Facebook site, as well as other comments in support of his efforts.

    He provided background to the members saying, “Bruce Fealk is a widely known liberal activist who makes Michael Moore look like Ronald Reagan.”

    “His escapades, especially against former Rep. Joe Knollenberg, are legendary and include a police order to stay away from Rep. Knollenberg’s house. His publication, The Rochester Citizen, and anyone who writes for it are not to be confused with legitimate media. It is a liberal left-wing publication that simply puts a party dress over a bomb vest.”

    It was decided the DDA Facebook policy will be addressed at the next DDA board meeting.

    I saw the headline in the Oakland Press, and knew the bozo was up to something again. Obviously he has a well deserved reputation in Rochester.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wow,Anon. You are doing some great work rooting out the radicals in Oakland County. Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah, great job, Anonymous. The article has already driven up our traffic quite a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How sad is it that bfealk gets more readers from Chris' blog then anywhere else.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This editorial really expands on Flipper's point:

    Using the Oklahoma City Bombing
    A Commentary by Debra J. Saunders
    Tuesday, April 20, 2010

    Monday was the anniversary of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that left 149 men and women - most of them federal workers - and 19 children dead. As is his habit, former President Bill Clinton used the occasion to bash his critics.

    In a New York Times opinion piece, "What We Learned in Oklahoma City," Clinton placed the blame on Americans who have advocated smaller government. The terrorists - bomber Timothy McVeigh and his accomplices - who targeted the Murrah Federal Building, he wrote, "took to the ultimate extreme an idea advocated in the months and years before the bombing by an increasingly vocal minority: the belief that the greatest threat to American freedom is our government, and that public servants do not protect our freedoms, but abuse them."

    When a former president seizes such a tragedy for partisan purposes, it is no wonder a new Pew Research poll found that a modest 22% of voters say they trust Washington to do the right thing most of the time.

    Clinton wrote that while criticism is "part of the lifeblood of democracy ... we should remember that there is a big difference between criticizing a policy or a politician and demonizing the government that guarantees our freedom and public servants who enforce our laws."

    What I want to know is: Other than the twisted McVeigh and company, who is not clear on this difference? Does Clinton think all his critics are stupid, or is he playing stupid?

    But wait, there's more. Clinton continued, "We must all assume responsibility for our words and actions before they enter a vast echo chamber and reach those both serious and delirious, connected and unhinged."

    Think about that for a minute: If anyone were to cast blame for the Fort Hood shootings that left 13 dead, or any other attacks within American military bases, on the antiwar movement, then that assertion would be followed by howls of outrage, and deservedly so. It would be absurd to suggest that opposition to the war be misconstrued as promoting violence against U.S. troops.
    Yet somehow arguing against President Obama's health care plan can be construed as practically an incitement to violence.

    And it doesn't matter if you blamed cult leader David Koresh - not federal agents - for the violence that claimed more than 80 lives in Waco in 1993. Or that you urged the death penalty as the only fitting punishment for McVeigh. Somehow if you oppose the expansion of the federal government, you are responsible for the violence that you abhor.

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations echoed Clinton in a press news release commemorating the Oklahoma City deaths that berated "experts," who initially blamed Muslim extremists for the bombing, then cited the need to "recognize that the same anti-government extremism that led to the attack is growing and is unfortunately moving toward the mainstream."

    The press news release then went on to denounce "stereotyping." Really.

    So what did Clinton learn from Oklahoma City? He learned that he could drive the wedge that divides the electorate even deeper - and in so doing, endear himself to the element of his party smitten with itself. But outside the Clinton echo chamber, it sounds like whimpering.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Al, I'm sorry that your hooterville mayoral candidacy is taking such a toll on you. Just keep up with connecting Waco to the OKC bombing and it'll go smoothly.

    Why would you even bring up Waco? Its not the other side of any OKC coin. Its the wackjobs McVeighs excuse for being a sadistic asshole and your just giving it credence. Does what happened at Waco give McVeigh the right to do what he did? Cause if that is the case i am sure Ayers and others can find reasons that make the weather underground okay too.

    The irony of a rightwinger claiming Clinton used OKC bombing to further his agenda is not lost on me, as Bush/Cheney used 9/11 to get us involved in iraq.

    Supposedly the bombing is an isolated incident and not representative of you guys on the right, but i don't see anyone here talking like that. I see Al mentioning Waco like its got some bearing on this, and Flips talking about how Clinton abused it. Nothing about how horrible the man was or anything like that.

    ReplyDelete
  17. ROFLMAO ... BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA ... Oh MAN, that is hilarious about FAILk! I've got to check out that article. Old ass-wipe .... LOL

    Wow, that councilman sure has FAILk's number too!! I see Comrade FAILk is taking the "no such thing as bad press" stance, but I can't wait to read the comments on this article. Soon to be defunct ... LOL, I thought it was already defunct, if they have FAILk as an editor!! LMAO

    FAILk is a constant source of comedy for us, isn't he?!? What an amusing idiot to have around, like our little court jester!! LOL

    ReplyDelete
  18. Joe, lol, wish I had found that article and posted it earlier, probably would have saved you some time in typing!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wonder if Rochester and their page would be interested in the hate-filled email that Comrade FAILk passed along from David Sole? I bet I can find that Councilman's email on the Rochester page, LOL

    ReplyDelete
  20. LOL ... FAILk is getting hammered:

    Tell Me wrote on Apr 20, 2010 11:55 AM:

    " Is his business located in DOWNTOWN Rochester? NO Is he running this out of his home? YES Is his home in downtown Rochester? no Is his home in Rochester Hills? Yes

    Is Fealk a left-wing bomb thrower? Yes

    Was he ordered to stay away from Knollengerg's home after harassing the Congressman's wife? YES

    Was he arrested for assaulting a police officer at a private Republican event that he was attempting to videotape after refusing to obey the officer's command to quit recording and subsequently shoving the officer? YES

    Was/Is he an actual or wannabe operative of moveon.org? YES

    Is he a member of multiple far left wing groups? YES

    Should he be prohibited from using the city's website for advertising because of the above? I definitely think so. "

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bruce is posting comments on there as well. I bet he's using his rag's mailing list to get help on posting comments as well. What a loser.

    Bruce wants to be a radical lefty without any of the consequences that that brings with it. When you falsely and without basis accuse people of being neo-fascists and racists I wouldn't expect anyone to take that sort of thing lightly, nor would I expect them to want to support you or buy your rag Bruce. Just a little tip on consumerism from me to you, free of charge. Idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Here's a link to the article, in case anyone wants to "help" Bruce with the traffic, LOL

    http://theoaklandpress.com/articles/2010/04/20/news/local_news/doc4bccfe4b9e40e126310580.txt

    ReplyDelete
  23. John, lmao.

    This is stupid. People are so fucking petty at times.

    The whole story is stupid. Wahhhhh, bruce Fealk posted on facebook. Ben whatever doesn't like leftwingers and takes cheap shots at them on thwe board. Wahhh...

    Comeon kids can we grow up now?


    i prefer this post in reponse to tell me...

    To Tell Me wrote on Apr 20, 2010 12:37 PM:

    " I'm curious... if someone who was a member of the Tea Party movement started an online paper in Rochester and wanted to promote it on the Rochester FB page, would his/her membership in a RIGHTwing organization disqualify them and cause you to say their free speech rights should be nullified? Moveon.org is no farther "left" than the Tea Party is "right." Both are legal organizations that sometimes go over their horse in promoting their causes. So?

    I have long thought that Bruce Fealk was his own worst enemy because of his tactics and behavior, but that is HIS problem. None of the things you mention should deprive him of his right to free speech in this country.

    As for the specific location of his business, if other Rochester-AREA businesses also make use of the DDA page, then he should not be excluded on that basis either. His publication, which I looked at for the first time today, covers city businesses, issues and activities.

    In fact, I wonder how many of the complainers have actually LOOKED at the paper's web site? Other than his editorials--easily avoided--it's pretty tame.

    Much ado about not much, IMO. "

    ReplyDelete
  24. That's okay Joe, you're entitled to your opinion. I think it's hilarious that radical lefty Bruce who is so dangerously unhinged that he gets arrested and who walks around with a pinata on his head; who sends out mass emails promoting other radical leftys to go out and protest a group that is protesting smaller government and lower taxes (including slurring that large group of peaceful citizens as being neo-fascists, racists, and all kinds of other things like the sexual slur "teabaggers"), thinks he's going to have a "non-partisan" community paper and pretend like he's not a flaming far-left radical liberal! Hell, Bruce insults and slurs his target audience on a daily if not HOURLY basis just on this blog alone, never mind whatever hate he spews on his own blog! And when he gets called on it, he starts his lies again!

    LOL Why isn't Comrade Bruce proud of what a radical lefty he is, and the legacy that he has achieved? He should be proud and loud about it! LMAO, and he should reap the rewards of what he has sewn. But please, if anyone believes this nut can be anything but a nut-job radical liberal they haven't been paying attention!

    By the way, somebody needs to explain to the writer of that comment that nobody is stopping Bruce's freedom of speech. I believe that was that Ron guys original complaint, that HIS freedom of speech was being infringed because his comments were being flagged by Bruce and deleted. I guess freedom varies depending on if you are a liberal sympathizer though, is that the commenter's point? I'm sure you would disagree, right Joe?

    ReplyDelete
  25. By the way, my original clean post on the OP was deleted. It only said something like the village of Rochester Hills always knows where to find its idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You would think with Comrade FEALk claiming the radical leftist whack-os are the majority in this area that he would try selling his rag as the newsletter for the radical left, and see how far he gets with it. I'm guessing he wouldn't get too far with just himself and Gary Peters as subscribers, LOL

    It's quite telling that he has to go conservative to try to sell a paper. Does NOT bode well for Comrade Peters or the rest of those Hypocrat radical leftists come November.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oh man, this article has nothing to do with politics, but it's hilarious:

    The 50 best author vs. author put-downs of all time

    http://www.examiner.com/x-562-Book-Examiner~y2010m4d16-The-50-best-author-vs-author-putdowns-of-all-time

    ReplyDelete
  28. Joe NEVER Said Clinton Was Responsible For Federal Building, Never Mentioned That you Did!

    You Seem At Times To Put Mouth In Gear and Then For What Ever Reason Your Thought Process Comes Out Your ASS! Never Mentioned Mc Veigh Replied To Your POST.

    Did Say I Thought Clintons Attempt To Smear Tea Party Was Over The Top and Thats My Opinion. Your Getting Like Bruce and That Would Be A Trip To Hooterville For Ya. JoeC Also Stated How Crazy McVeight Was and Said Equation That YOU Stated Might Be Closer Than You Think! Relax Joec and Watch Your Salt!

    ReplyDelete

Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.