Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Grab Your Guns And Bible 'Cuz Obamas Coming

As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope it isn't registered!  It begins... more Freedom gone...the right to protect yourself and your family gone!  Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return!
Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own.  It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.  This bill was introduced on February 24, 2009, by the Obama staff.  BUT, this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986.  This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all.  Trust Obama?  You must be kidding!  The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage: www.senate.gov.  You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099.  You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do.
Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know.  Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009: www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text.  Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply.  It has begun....  Whatever Obama's "Secret Master Plan" is... this is just the 'tip of the iceberg!'  Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House.  This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.  Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual, the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!
To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Goggle HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
1) It is registered
2) You are fingerprinted
3) You supply a current Driver's License
4) You supply your Social Security number
5) You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing
Each update change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25. Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.  There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision.  Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.
If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along.  Any hunters in your family?  Pass this along.  This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.  This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45
http://www.opencong/ress.org/bill/111-h45/showGovTrack.us
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA , whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right to choose.

10 comments:

  1. I just read this to my hubby, who is the gun owner in our house. He checked the NRA website, which said it's an old alert with only a grain of truth. I hope they are right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mari,Obama is useing many avenues to restrict guns if not to abolish the 2nd Amendment outright. Please see what your husband thinks of a piece I did @
    http://christopher-conservativeperspective.blogspot.com/2009/11/czar-alert.html.

    As far as the bill being true,it is. However as of right now it is a fringe bill with no co-sponsers but we all MUST stay vigilent. Incidents like Ft. Hood caused by a terrorist get the gun-banning whackos going and a fringe bill gains momentum.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow. I just read it to my hubby, who is a gun owner/hunter/collector. He is appalled. He is also appalled at the $50 tax per firearm. He added it up in his head and was not pleased. Let's just say we have 3 children and our child tax credit will be eaten up (and more) by this gun tax.

    Thanks libs. Thanks a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. They are nudgeing people off of their guns like they nudge people out of smoking and breast mamogram exames untill you are 50 instead of 40. Yesterday I took two young men from my church hunting for their first time. I never want to see that go away. I think they are trying to push some of the guns undergrownd. Don't forget they already told Homeland Sec. to watch out for NRA types. They are nudging. Christopher did a good piece on other things the govt is doing on guns. What will we do when only bad people have guns? See the govt doesn't want to take all guns away. The govt will always have guns and the bad people will always have guns. So who do they want to take the guns away from? We the people that is who. After that watch what happens to America. The govt already called us "right wing extreemists".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Friday, May 29, 2009

    In the last few weeks, NRA-ILA has received hundreds of e-mails warning us about “SB-2099,” a bill that would supposedly require you to report all your guns on your income tax return every April 15.

    Like many rumors, there’s just a grain of truth to this one. Someone’s recycling an old alert, which wasn’t even very accurate when it was new.

    There actually was a U.S. Senate bill with that number that would have taxed handguns—nine years ago. It was introduced by anti-gun Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), and it would have included handguns under the National Firearms Act’s tax and registration scheme. This has nothing to do with anyone’s Form 1040, of course.

    Fortunately, S. 2099 disappeared without any action by the Senate, back when Bill Clinton was still in the White House. We reported about it back then, just as we report about new anti-gun bills every week. Now, it’s time for gun owners to drop this old distraction and focus on the real threats at hand.






    U.S. Representative Bobby Rush (D-Ill.) recently sponsored H.R. 45, also known as "Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act." The bill is, at its core and as its name implies, a licensing and registration scheme.

    The measure calls for all handgun owners to submit to the federal government an application that shall include, among many other things: a photo; an address; a thumbprint; a completed, written firearm safety test; private mental health records; and a fee. And those are only some of the requirements to be licensed!

    The bill would further require the attorney general to establish a database of every handgun sale, transfer, and owner's address in America. Moreover, the bill would make it illegal to own or possess a "qualifying firearm" -- defined as "any handgun; or any semiautomatic firearm that can accept any detachable ammunition feeding device…" [emphasis added] without one of the proposed licenses.

    Additionally, the bill would make it illegal to transfer ownership of a "qualifying firearm" to anyone who is not a licensed gun dealer or collector (with very few exceptions), and would require "qualifying firearm" owners to report all transfers to the attorney general's database. It would also be illegal for a licensed gun owner to fail to record a gun loss or theft within 72 hours, or fail to report a change of address within 60 days. Further, if a minor obtains a firearm and injures someone with it, the owner of the firearm may face a multiple-year jail sentence.

    H.R. 45 is essentially a reintroduction of H.R. 2666, which Rush introduced in 2007. H.R. 2666 contained much of the same language as H.R. 45, and was co-sponsored by several well-known anti-gun legislators--including Barack Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. H.R. 45 currently has no co-sponsors.

    Rest assured that NRA-ILA will continue to monitor this bill closely, and will keep you informed of any developments if they materialize.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't open any of your links brother...something about mhtml...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I just pulled the last one up. Keep trying they might be getting flooded or something. The right wing conservative movement is gaining fast. If the liberals don't do something soon they will be where the Republicans where 9 months ago. But we all know the conservative way always worked in the past. If the liberal way succeeds it will be their first time. What failed in the past and with other countries will fail under the Obama admin. It's a shame. We could have used a strong good president right now. And with a perfect storm of both houses of Congress going far left.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There is no way I would report my guns. It's like NAZI Germany! You need a permit for everything.

    ReplyDelete
  9. While i am very unlikely to support this bill. I don't have a guns in my house becuase of my kids, i have owned guns and do still hunt occasionally with friends using their weapons but there are some aspects of the bill that may have a place in our society.

    I am an extremely vehement supporter of gun safes due to the reality that many of the guns stolen and used in later crimes comes from seemingly responsible gun owners who keep their guns in wall racks, on shelves, in drawers, and the glass cases. I know all the thinking against gun safes, but I wouldn't want to see my gun used to murder someone down the line.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I lived in Japan. They took all the guns away from everyone but their militarty.The cops didn't have guns but every guy with a "punch perm" Yakuza had a gun. I had friends that were Japanese Mafia Yakuza and they had guns. You had to rent a gun from the gov't if you had a hunt somewhere. But once again only the very wealthy could hunt. Just like when they make booz illegal. All the criminals had booz but no one else had it.

    ReplyDelete

Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.