Monday, January 4, 2010

God Bless Those That Stand Up For Our Rights

New Mexico, the Land of Enchantment, is still a gun friendly part of the great west. What laws are these people breaking? The left would like everyone to believe the Tea Party conservatives are as dangerous as the left. There is no proof of this danger as of yet but they keep saying it's there. We have had a couple of terrorist attacks by Muslims since Bush left office. But they want us to worry about those scary conservatives. What kind of dumb magic show are they doing here? We are getting sick of you Democrats telling us who to be affraid of and then you give us your politicaly correct playbook. No more politicaly correct. If what you are saying is BS we will call you out for it. How many left wing organizations riot every year here in America? How many terrorist attacks have been from Muslims and left wing extreemists? Almost every terrorist act has been coused by those two groups. And yet the Democrats Homeland Security says we need to look out for our vets,pro life,tea party protester,people with right wing Ron Paul stickers on their car. Should we be shocked when another terrorist attack happens and its a left wing organization or an Islamic extreemist? They keep telling everyone we are the threat and they want our guns to boot. Stop looking at the hand the liberal magicians tell you to look at and maybe you wont be shocked at the results. While the left wing blogs and media are telling us to be careful of the conservatives. We need to tell everyone how rediculous their tactic are. This week I would like everyone to pass this story along. Tell everyone you see how dumb the PC left wing is and what their game is. Have fun making fun of the left. I know I do.


  1. lol...

    you accusing the left of fearmongering is seriously silly. The right wrote the playbook on that.

    But seriously why would you want to be part of something that desecretes the flag if your such a patriot? the video capture clearly shows a person desecrating the flag while waving another flag.

  2. I missed the implications of this up front and I bet you all did too, but I am hearing from members of the American intelligence community and some on the outside closely connected to those on the inside who are raising a huge red flag right now.

    It appears Barack Obama inexperience and amateurishness has just started bonfires on the bridges connecting him to the American intelligence community and delivered a huge, HUGE psychological win to Al Qaeda.

    People tell me the President’s rush to acknowledge the attack on the CIA in Afghanistan and mourn the deaths openly, publicly, and via press release is a huge no no. The CIA and greater intelligence community would prefer not to have the attention put on them. Additionally, because the President took the time to draft a blanket statement focused on the CIA in general instead of individually and more privately focusing on the families of the victims, it acknowledges the CIA’s work in Afghanistan, acknowledges that the attack has an impact on the CIA, and gives the terrorists a new recruiting tool — “you too can cause America to publicly mourn the loss of their spies.”

    To you and me this may not seem like a big deal. But I’m told this is hugely significant and shows just how out of touch the Obama administration is with the intelligence community. I’m told that no other President has issued such blanket statements of public mourning directed toward an attack on the CIA and thereby having the White House itself confirming an attack on our intelligence community.

    The intelligence community is licking its wounds right now and Obama’s rush to confirm for the world that the community suffered such wounds has the intelligence community simmering tonight and Al Qaeda preparing a PR blitz with what they view as good news.

    UPDATED: Take the information above and couple it with this. The White House is subtly blaming the intelligence community for the failure to deduce the Delta/Northwest attack.


    Presidential aides are concerned that Obama will somehow be unfairly accused of dropping the ball on the fight against terrorist in Yemen

    Because the President is worried about being blamed, the White House is trying to blame the CIA while at the same time undermining the CIA through a rush to publicize the Afghan attack.

    Either this White House is willfully trying to sabotage the intelligence community or they are rank amateurs. I pray to God in Heaven it is the latter.

  3. Within twenty-four hours of the terrorist trying to blow up the plane, the White House was giving briefings by a “Senior Administration Official” who mostly like was Obama, Axelrod, or Jarrett, pointing out that the terrorist watch list was created by the Bush administration.

    Then the White House Counsel’s Office sent out a memo demanding any and all documentation to show that the Bush administration had done worse.

    Then the White House decided it needed to look into the “systemic failures” of the operation that George Bush had put in place.

    234 days into George W. Bush’s first contentious year in office, four planes were hijacked and used as missiles to strike the United States. Shortly thereafter, Richard Reid tried to blow up another jet.

    George Bush never tried to disown 9/11 or Richard Reid. He never tried to say, “hey, it was Clinton’s problem.” Sure, in fact, a lot of what led to 9/11 happened on Bill Clinton’s watch and he failed in most every measure to shut down Al Qaeda.

    But after 9/11, George Bush didn’t spend his first day, second day, or third day blaming Clinton. He set out to destroy Al Qaeda. After Richard Reid, we’ve been pretty darn safe flying.

    In fact, under George Bush leading scholars and pundits declared Al Qaeda marginalized. By 2003, the pontiffs of miasmatic beltway wisdom were near unanimous that Al Qaeda was near dismantled.

    You really need to read this editorial in the London Telegraph by Toby Harnden. It really hits this point where it needs hitting.

    For a man who campaigned denouncing the politicisation of national security under President George W Bush, it is worth noting how intensely political Obama’s treatment of what might henceforth be known as Underpantsgate has been.

    His White House recognised its political vulnerability more readily than it comprehended the level of danger faced by Americans.

    That last bit is the most troubling part of this.

    At the end of the first year of Barack Obama’s administration, there’s something moving in the shadows of Mount Doom. It wasn’t there while George Bush was in charge. But Barack Obama is no George Bush. And the strategy of blaming Bush for being weak on terror will not work after eight years of blaming Bush for being too bloodthirsty.

  4. Hey Joe Supreme Court says Basicly you CANT Desecrate the FLAG! Remember that Flag Burning Ruling several Years ago! I Do seem to Remember War protest Years back Where FLAGS were Burning and Protesters were JUST Pleased as Punch cause they DID that! Guess Different Rules for Different Players!
    Still did not see Flag Desecration other than Protester Wearing SHIRT but JOE its Leagal YOU KNOW not Against the LAW!

    Question Joe Would you feel Safer in LARGE LIB Run City ARMED or with Cell Phone to Call for HELP!

  5. I wonder if Bruce and JoeC were the two trannies getting it on in the bathroom:

  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

  7. Rounding off a busy year in 2009 campaigning for Americans’ constitutional rights, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) has condemned leading politicians in Washington state and Chicago for what they see as an attack on civil liberties.

    First, it blasted Washington’s proposed ban on assault weapons, sponsored by three Democratic state senators, saying it shifts the blame for recent violent crimes from the perpetrators to law-abiding gun owners.

    "Tens of thousands of Evergreen State citizens own the kind of semiautomatic sport-utility rifles and shotguns that these Democrat lawmakers want banned," said the organization’s chairman Alan Gottlieb, specifying that people use them for hunting, target shooting and competition, recreational shooting, predator control and home defense.

    "For [the legislators] to demonize them and their firearms smacks of hysteria and social bigotry," he adds.

    The organization has also criticized Chicago Mayor Richard Daley for spending resources defending a gun ban that it says will soon be declared unconstitutional, while he shuts down certain city services due to budgetary constraints.

    The city is being sued by the Second Amendment Foundation, Illinois State Rifle Association and four individual citizens to overturn its long-standing handgun ban. The case is set to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 2, and a ruling is expected in June.

  8. Al, desecretion of the flag is legal, you and i know that, but it is still desecretion.

    You and the fellow patriots here want to ignore it, you can, but wearing a flag shirt is technically a descretion of the flag. look it up.

    what war protesters did has no bearing on this conversation as i am not one of them, nor do i claim to have been. Chris and others like to talk about how great the tea baggers are so i was pointing out the reality.

  9. I guess those flag pins must be illegal as hell. Maybe we can bust Obummer on that now that he has finally taken to wearing them. Thanks Joey you're a class act.

    I do so enjoy washing my tea bags in you and the other Hypocrat's mouths. Good times.

    P.S. - You've got one of my pubes stuck in your teeth.

  10. JoeC Hats Pins Shirts and Pants! Heck Uncle Sam Wears what looks like a FLAG! NIP Picking Joec Just admit you DUNT like TEA BAGGERS!


Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.