FREEDOM and where are the liberals taking it?

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined,

but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to

maintain a status of independence from any who might

attempt to abuse them, which would include their

own government." -- George Washington
1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."  ~Thomas Jefferson

   2.  Those who trade liberty for security have neither. ~John Adams

3.     Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
4.     An armed man is a citizen.  An unarmed man is a subject.

       
5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.

6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.

 7.  You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8.  Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.                                            9.  You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11.  64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

12.  The  United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

13.  The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

14.  What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?                                                  15.  Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.                                                                      16.  When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.

17.  The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

Obama + Google= Net Neutrality Scheme XOXOXO

 Google – and its puppets like Free Press – are promoting this idea that it’s a struggle between big telecommunications firms, and the little guys. Except the little guys are actually bigger Internet firms. The corporations pressing for Net Neutrality are Fortune 500 and even Dow Jones Industrial Average firms, with billions in cash ready to be spent on Net Neutrality, trying to defeat Proposition 8, or even promoting Barack Obama.
That last one makes the FCC’s rush to regulate look bad, given all the placements of Google people within the Obama administration as well as the nearly one million dollars that Google employees gave to the Obama-Biden campaign. How do we know that the secretive Obama White House isn’t directing the FCC to pay off Google?
After all, we know he’s giving donors special treatment. In fact, it has come out that FCC Chairman Genachowski himself was a major fundraiser for Obama, pulling in over a half million for the campaign. Why shouldn’t we believe that this is all a big circle of back scratching in the Obama adminstration, when he refuses to release the kinds of information we need to determine otherwise?
The President has played political games with information all along. He dangles his birth certificate on a string in order to distract the right. He’s keeping as little of the Obamacare agenda in writing as possible, because he knows if we read it and expose his plans, we can win the fight, so we end up with ridiculous spectacles like a Senate committee voting on a bill that hasn’t been written yet. And now he’s playing footsie with donors in secret.
We must encourage and join Senator McCain and Representative Blackburn in their fresh legislative efforts to stop the Google/Obama Net Neutrality scheme. We cannot allow this kind of quid pro quo to go unchallenged.