The way the left are going after Sarah Palin makes me like her even more. I don't know if she will run for President or not. I don't care either. That isn't her role right now. She is helping grow the conservative movement. The left seem to be upset of the fact that the conservatives are becoming more organized then they ever have been. They charge a lot of money for this event because they can. Money is power and the conservatives are using money just like the liberal left have done. It's still grass roots but more organized. This Tea Party conservative movement has not only intrenched themselves within the Libertarian and Republican party to bring them in line with the majority of Americans that are conservative. But we conservatives are taking the Blue Dog Democrats back from the progressives extreemists. The left are froathing at the mouth with this movement. They are trying to define who and what the Tea Party conservatives are. But it is not for them to define us. We define us and we are doing a great job of doing that. We now have a deaf ear to the progressives now. They are nothing more then a ringiong in the backround. They have become nothing more then a speck on the ass of the conservative movement. And that is why they are lashing out and defining them unfaverably. We are starting to see the mental illness called liberal progressive. While they have been spending their time blaming eveyone but those in power. We have been moving forward with plans on how to fix the messes the progressives in both parties have made. Have fun watching the left go CRAZY over a strong conservative women with an accent strenghten theRepublican base within the TEA Party movement. I know I'm enjoying it. 
Chris - I believe that Sarah Palin is a classic example of form over substance. But I hope you get your wish and she does become the Republican candidate for President in 2012. It should clearly delineate the Left and the Right - assuming Obama runs for reelection. However, given her track record, you would be wise to choose a sound VP candidate, as more than likely he or she will have to take over before the 4years are over. If she thinks being governor of Alaska was too hard, how do you think she will handle the Presidency?
ReplyDeleteMike nice to have you here again. I however do not wish her to be the candidate for President. I think she is a grea t destraction though and I do like her personality. I would like to see her on as a VP. The fact that she left as governor put a bad taste in my mouth about her as well. But she isn't running for anything. People one the right and middle like her as a person and a conservative speaker. I hope she doesn't run in 2012. I think she is a better conservative motivater then a leader. But the fact is too many people are putting the cart before the hourse when talking about her running for 2012. It's just a distraction from what she is doing for the conservatives in 2010,now. And if the Republicans can take 2010 they better do a great job at being conservative. Because the conservatives aren't as loyal to a party as you liberals are to the Democrat party. We conservatives will put in a third party before we will let a party take us for a ride. You do know what that feels like don't ya Mike? Obama hasn't done what he said he would,is he now? We don't want to make the same mistakes that you progressives did by towing the party line. And the nice thing is we conservatives would rather vote in a JFK Blue Dog Democrat or Libertarian then a progressive John McCain.
ReplyDeleteSarah Palin is a retard like her son. Why would she have that kid anyways? Is it so she could make more retarded neo-cons? Go teabag yourselves.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePalin 2012 for the GOP. Go Sarah! Run, run, run. Please, please, please choose Sarah as the candidate for the GOP or Tea Party in 2012.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, Chris, that she's a distraction, but I think she is planning to run and given her "star power," she could very well be the GOP candidate in 2012. At least I see a scenario where that would happen, given the weak field the GOP has for 2012 as of now.
I can just see her in a debate with President Obama. Wow, that would be one big butt kicking. She'd have to have more hands to write her answers down on.
Bruce Once Again You Put Your Donkey before the Cart!
ReplyDeleteI Have said All Along Palins Best Point is She does Connect with the People and in 2010 Elections She Will Be a Force. 2012 Kinda Down the Road A Bit. Heck By then Nobama Might Pull a LBJ on Us and Just Go Away Also! AS Chris Said a Mc Cain Republican to Me is a Blue Dog Demoncrat and though I Admire Mc Cain and His Service to OUR Country, a Canadate of the Same Mold Will BE Unwise at Best!
As Far as Debates GO Voters have HEARD the Talk and SEEN the Walk and THIS Time Around AINT Going to be FOOLED and There Lies Nobamas Problem! He Made the MISTAKE of Waking UP Citizens and For That I Thank Him !
The GOP is still galvinizing itself. It's too long away to think about. Now from what I can see there should be some great candidates coming from the ashes of the GOP. There might even be some strong conservative Reagan Democrats that run this year. But one thing I know for sure is that the liberals/progressives are over with. Most people are getting dry heeve when they hear the words progressive and liberal since the Democrats have been over run by them.
ReplyDeleteVery well said AL. I'm glade to have you as a voice on this blog. Thank goodness you don't do snow golfing.LOL
ReplyDeleteChris, name one "great candidate" from the GOP. A Reagan Republican wouldn't be nearly conservative enough for the Tea Party. Reagan would miserably fail the litmus test that the RNC and the Tea Party has put in place.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats are far from over, although I'm sure in the little world you live in listening to Fox "News" and Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, I'm sure you totally believe your own rhetoric.
If you're going to enforce your "clean and nice" rule, John won't be able to post here any more. Thank god for that.
Hah! What's wrong FAILk, tired of getting proven wrong by me?!? LOL ... Hey FAILk, we're still waiting to hear about all this "fraud" the banks were committing. Just like Al is apparently still waiting to see that video with the school kids singing Bush's praises, and just like everyone else is waiting for you to make sense and stop telling lies.
ReplyDeleteCracks me up that FAILk is scared and worried about Palin and the tea party. Hey FAILk, the last one we'll be taking advice on running candidates from is the team that turned over Jersey, Virginia, and now a Massachusetts Senate seat to the Republicans. BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!
vomamike, great to have you writing in again. I wrote in to FAILk's blog a few times to chat at you and encourage you to come on here but FAILk wouldn't post my comments. He apparently doesn't allow anybody on there who disagrees with his echo chamber. It's great to see you on here though, FAILk has really been making you regressives look bad. Hopefully you can provide some fact-checking filter for FAILk.
ReplyDeleteI, too, would not want to see her as a presidential candidate and honestly, despite what she "says", I don't think she wants that job. VP? Sure. We've got 3 years to polish her for that.
ReplyDeleteI think you're right Chris. I think her role right now is to grow the conservative movement (which is growing by leaps and bounds) and if it takes a (perceived) inarticulate "backwoods hick" (perceived...not my assessment of her) to do that...well, then let's just say our country was founded on (perceived) inarticulate backwoods hicks.
Still chuckling about how on top (pun not intended) of Palin Bruce is. Have you been reading her book Bruce, just like you read that book by David Duke? Doing some "research" "George"?! LOL
ReplyDeleteWow, if Bruce would put the time into looking into Barry Soetoro's past that he does looking into Fox News analyst and ex-Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin, FAILk might discover some interesting bits! ROFLMAO
We still have power in my house. DC has never looked so soft. The conservatives are making the Democrats nervous for sure. Not the conservative Republican but the conservative Democrats. Black conservatives are making a move to the Tea parties in large amounts. They tend to be (I) or Libertarian that will not vote for a Democrat. They have been let down more then any group.
ReplyDeleteChris could you do a blog on the New Black Panther Party movement? They also have been growing like the teabaggers.
ReplyDeleteJay Ney Dont Remember LONG Lines Of Black Panthers VOTING But it is Their Right and They Should USE IT,Just Put DOWN the Batons!
ReplyDeleteJohn, here's a story about Bush's praises being sung by school children, in of all places, New Orleans, which was one of Bush's worst moments among many bad moments.
ReplyDeletehttp://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/17/katrina-song/
I love the ads on this blog. I found some cool things off of them. Ann Coulter and the Libertarian ad are the best. Great comments as well.
ReplyDeleteBruce Story Starts OUT Saying Song Was Prasing MRS Bush,Fema and Pres Bush for there Aide During Katrina Which is a WEE bit Different than, Children Singing Nobams Name in VERSE But You Did Present a HALF Truth Which is More Than Usual!
ReplyDeleteListening to LIBS and HOW Bad Bush Administration Reacted to Katrina While Demoncrats in POWER, Surprizes ME that Children were ALLOWED to Sing to Bushes and Fema At ALL! Theres Probablly a Story there TOO If Bush Administration Did Such a BAD Job Why Would there Be a Song of Praise?
No, Al, the song was sung to Laura Bush, but praising President Bush for his Katrina response, of all things. Ironic, huh?
ReplyDeleteAlas, such "propaganda" has not been limited to despots, dictators and the Obama White House. As a savvy source points out, back in 2006 children from Gulf Coast states serenaded First Lady Laura Bush with a song praising the President, Congress, and Federal Emergency Management Agency for their response to -- of all things -- Hurricane Katrina. The lyrics were as follow:
Bruce You are COMPARING Apples and Turnips BUT if it Makes You Feel Good So BE! Thanks For Agreeing With Me,Did Not Think You Had it in YA! Your Post Mirrors Mine Except for the Propaganda which I Assume You Meant for Nobamas Song with The 5 Year OLDS!
ReplyDeleteHey Right Wing Moma - back woods?? Check the biography of just half the signers of the Declaration of Independence. They were some of the most learned men America had to offer in that era.
ReplyDeleteI didn't write this, but it expresses how I feel about the lack of authentic anger from the teabaggers.
ReplyDeleteWe had eight years of Bush and Cheney, Now you get mad!
You didn't get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and
appointed a President..
You didn't get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate
energy policy.
You didn't get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed.
You didn't get mad when the Patriot Act got passed.
You didn't get mad when we illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to
us.
You didn't get mad when we spent over 600 billion(and counting) on said
illegal war.
You didn't get mad when over 10 billion dollars just disappeared in Iraq .
You didn't get mad when you found out we were torturing people.
You didn't get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping Americans.
You didn't get mad when we didn't catch Bin Laden.
You didn't get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.
You didn't get mad when we let a major US city drown.
You didn't get mad when we gave a 900 billion tax break to the rich.
You didn't get mad when the deficit hit the trillion dollar mark.
You finally got mad when the government decided that people in America
deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick. Yes, illegal wars, lies,
corruption, torture, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, are all
okay with you, but helping other Americans... oh hell no.
Is "Authentic anger" rioting? We conservatives don't do that Bruce. We are nothing like you liberals. We so up and we write letters. We don't bomb things like you liberals when we are angry. We don't stalk people with paper mache heqads and stalk their families. We don't threaten to kill people like you liberals do. But you had no problem saying that we would do these thing and no0w that you see we are growing in leaps and bounds you say we aren't "Authenticly angry". Now the left gave up the weekly protests of,the war,GITMO,national debt,torture,closing the boarder and everything else you have done. But you stioll have had just as many Glenn Beck protests as anti war protests. I see you never fail to project you impotence as a group on us. We are the authentic ones. We protest all parties when they aren't fiscally conservative. We are mostly made up of Libertarians and Republicans and you say that we are all far right. That is as dumb as saying we not "authebnticly angry". You liberals can't be taken serious. Maybe vomamike or JoeC can clear up what you are talking about. Because all I see is the mirroring you are doing Bruce. And don't forget to call us racist and blame the Republicans for everything. That is going great. BWAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
ReplyDeletevomamike our founding fathers were considered "back woods" to the English not to the Americans. I'm sure that is what she meant by that.
ReplyDeleteBruce We Sound Angry Today,Even More Than Usual! When I read Your Post Sounds like Your Talking About Nobama! Thats WHY Politics as USUAL Are Over and the Tea Baggers WILL Assist it that With Common Sense Agenda Starting in November. Politicans From Both Parties WHO Favor BIG SPENDING and Big DEFICIT Are in BIG TROUBLE!
ReplyDeleteEventually You May Stop LOOKING in the REAR View Mirror as YOU Drive THROUGH LiFe BUT I Fear YOU Will Run Out of GAS First!
Chris, you are so full of crap. Where were your protests during the Bush years, huh?
ReplyDeleteYou didn't get angry until Barack Obama was elected President. Why don't you comment on why you weren't angry about the things I put in my post? You know you can't. You know you are fake grass roots. You know that you are not upset about fiscal responsibility. You are upset, deep, deep down, maybe so deep you can't admit it to yourselves, that you don't like the fact that an African American is President of the Unites States of America.
Bruce The Race Card! Still LOOKING in that REAR View Mirror! Are You a SHRINK or Are You SEEING ONE! I Suspect its The LATTER! Your Begining to Rant More and Make EVEN Less Sense than You Normally DO! You are THE Typical Left Wing Mouth Piece. Go After the Messenger in "Man Made Disaster Mode" and then Run!
ReplyDeleteBruce You Get INTO Verbal JUDO with Chris Your Going to Need BACK UP,cause He Will Hand you Your Buttocks.
Whatever Bruce. You are just so laughable. Why don't you on the left still protest? That is the question. We didn't protest about the wars,water boarding because that is your issues not our. Where are they now? We didn't bitch about FEMA because we were the ones doing something about it and sending them money. Remember the "Chocolate city" remark. I don't remember hearing you on the left scream racism. The fact is you on the left are the fake ones. The deficit didn't become an issue to the right until Bush did TARP and we did protest. This right wing protesting is something that is growing just like our debt. It's about the debt and always has been about the debt. You on the left want to make it about race. Where the heck are those protester of yours Bruce? A anti Beck or anti Palin protest? Give me a break with your fake racism bigotry. We are new to this protesting and community organizing. This isn't our way. It was your way on the left though. But not any more. Why is that Bruce?????? Was the war protest fake when Bush was President? Was it only torture when Bush was President? Is withholding medical care for 50 min. torture Bruce??? Is it Bruce??? Is leaving a black man suffering without surgery less of torture then pooring water over his face????? You man Obama is no different then Bush but you treat him much different. You were the ones that protest when we stayed home and wrote letter. You can act all stupified all you want. But it is you on the left that bailed on you fake principles when Obama got elected. The debt is higher then ever and that is what is growing the Tea Party movement. Not the wars,not the color of Obamas skin,not the Patriot act,not water boarding or other forms of torture. Those are what you on the left USED to stqand for. So don't blame me when no on takes your fake anger seriously. How could we when you are the ones that dropped the sign when a Democrat got elected. You are the posers not us. We hated the deficit then and now. Where the heck are you? You had one fake anti war protest with 20 people as to try and prove you are not hypocrits. We didn't buy it. So get out your paper mache head and your Nazi posters and burnt flags and scream the same vitrial you yelled at Bush. Then we might take you serious again. Until you act like you did under a Republic,sit down and shut up. And don't worry we know you on the left will be out in full force once Congress falls to the Republicans in mass. Then you will all be out again like little rats.
ReplyDeleteThanks AL for the backup and clarity you give.
ReplyDeleteBruce,I see a black man was at the National Tea Party convention. Maybe he was just paid to be there? Or maybe he is a white man in black face. Oh crap there were a lot of black conservatives at the party. They must all be racist too. The black conservative racist must hate the white half of Obama. You liberals are just too funny with your race baiting.
ReplyDelete“It’s innate racism, and I think it’s why young people are turned off by this movement,” McCain charged of Tancredo’s remarks. “Revolutions start with young people, not with 65-year-old people talking about literacy tests and people who can’t say the word vote in English. It’s ridiculous.”
ReplyDelete“These people are not as relevant as they say they are,” she said. “I think my father would be president if they were really that powerful.”
Vomamike, Chris is correct.
ReplyDeleteConservativism, on which the USA was founded, is considered "back woods" idealism. That's what I was referring to.