Thursday, July 28, 2011

Open Thread On The Debt Crisis



While liberals and the MSM are trying to say that the Norwegian murder is equivalent to the Muslims that have killed thousands of people in Sudan alone we are focused on what is happening in this country. If the left-wing of this country think that the Norwegian killer is equivalent to the travesties the Muslims have done in the name of Allah and the Qua ran I can't argue with that. As you can't argue with crazy. So while they have their turret like rants about that nonsense we will look at reality.
Appearing in Saudi papers on July 13, the fatwa complains that “Uninformed interference with Sharia rulings by the press and journalists is on the increase, posing dire consequences to society, including their interference with the question of marriage to small girls who have not reached maturity, and their demand that a minimum age be set for girls to marry.”
Fawzan insists that nowhere does Sharia set an age limit for marrying girls: like countless Muslim scholars before him, he relies on Koran 65:4, which discusses marriage to females who have not yet begun menstruating (i.e., are prepubescent)  and the fact that Muhammad, Islam’s role model, married Aishawhen she was 6-years-old, “consummating” the marriage—or, in modern parlance, raping her—when she was 9.
It turns out that liberals and the Qua ran have a lot in common.
Fawzan reportedly illustrates this point by quoting Ibn Batal’s authoritative religious text Sahih Bukhari:
The ulema [Islam’s interpreters] have agreed that it is permissible for fathers to marry off their small daughters, even if they are in the cradle.  But it is not permissible for their husbands to have sex with them unless they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men.  And their capability in this regard varies based on their nature and capacity.  Aisha was 6 when she married the prophet, but he had sex with her when she was 9 [i.e., when she was deemed capable].
Fawzan then  reportedly concludes his fatwa with the warning:
“It behooves those who call for setting a minimum age for marriage to fear Allah and not contradict his Sharia, or try to legislate things Allah did not permit.  For laws are Allah’s province; and legislation is his excusive right, to be shared by none other.  And among these are the rules governing marriage.”
FP reminds us that Fawzan is not the first Islamic leader to legitimize pedophilia in Islam and that the former grand mufti of Saudi Arabia himself also supported “child-marriage,” citing the Quran and Sunna as proof.
Needless to say many young girls are falling victim such rulings. FP relates the circumstances surrounding the horrific death of a 13 year old girl who was reportedly raped and killed by her husband:
Recall, for instance, the 13-year-old girl who died while her much older husband was copulating with her (it was later revealed that, due to her reluctance, he was tying her up and “raping” her—as if there is another way to describe sex with children); or the 12-year-old who died giving birth to a stillborn; or the 10-year-old who made headlines by hiding out from her 80-year-old “husband.”
But there are likely numerous other instances that go unreported as the victims’ fear bringing any attention that might result in further abuse, or even their murder.
Where are the human rights abuse investigations at times like these? You can't ague with crazy. So while the rest of us debate the real issue of our debt, the liberals can keep trying to prove their point that Christians are the problem and one murder is equivalent to what Muslims have done and the Qua ran says to do.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Where Is The Obama Spending Crisis Plan?




ED HENRY, FOX NEWS CHIEF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: …If you basically have this Boehner plan that you say can’t get through the Senate and you've got a Reid plan that the Republicans don’t think you can get through the Senate or the House and you’re saying we want a compromise, what was the point of giving a prime-time address to the nation without an Obama plan and say neither of these other plans can work? Where's his plan?

(CROSSTALK)

JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: I understand the idea that there is not an Obama plan is like point…

HENRY: But there’s not one on paper.

CARNEY: …point No. 1 on the talking points issued by the Republican Party. I get it.

(CROSSTALK)

HENRY: No, no, no. That’s not a talking point. Show us the plan. It’s not a talking point. That’s unfair. Where’s the plan?

CROSSTALK)

CARNEY: First of all, the president put forward in detail his principles at George Washington University…

(CROSSTALK)

HENRY: Principles. Right. That’s not a plan.

CARNEY: …quite a lot of detail. The president stood before you, I can’t remember if you were here Friday night, some of you  weren’t because you cut out early, but a lot of you were (GROANS FROM THE PRESS) and he put forward in detail with numbers what he’s willing to do. He then referred from the podium to the fact that White House officials would be briefing in detail.

Has the media begun to notice the wheels coming off at the White House? First, Politico notices that Obama still hasn’t offered any solutions despite the late hour of the fiscal crisis at hand. Last night, CNN’s Gloria Borger noticed that Obama seems out of the loop on the actual proposals floating around the Beltway, too. Obama tried to pump up support for tax increases, which makes him a chorus of … one:
Obama is the president now, not a community organizer. The president should have a plan that is written down. But instead he just keeps tearing apart Congresses plans.

Obama has done nothing but obstructed Congress from fixing the spending problem in Washington and Americans know it. I can't believe that the president took nothing to the American people but hot air and divisive rhetoric. But that is all he has is talk and talk is cheap. For some reason Obama thought that he could take nothing to the people but talk and expect them to rally behind him. It turns out that the American people did call Congress, but not in support of the Obama non-plan. The American public have been calling Congress to tell them to "stop spending" their money.

Polls are coming out that show that Obama has been losing his Democratic base in droves thanks to his lack of leadership and methods. Liberals know that Obama is screwing everything up. That is why they are trying to divert attention away from the President's buffoonery.

When it comes down to it the simpletons will always follow Obama no matter what he does. They will take the hook and jump in the boat. Those same simpletons will bark when Obama and his left-wing minion tell them to bark. But the fact is most Americans aren't buying his empty words and divisive rhetoric. Once the val has been lifted from the eyes of his ex-supporters he will never get them back. We have all seen salespeople that over sell and under deliver. You may like the salesperson and might even excuse them for a while. But at some point and time they better deliver what they promised and they better have a product to sell. The fact that this buffoon of a president took nothing to the people and ask them to buy nothing in exchange for a blank check is just ridiculous. He may think the American people are that dumb or that he is that charismatic but I know the American people aren't that dumb. And I know that the American people know how to spend their money better then these shlubs in Washington.

People were pissed at Bush for all his spending. Obama has taken mindless spending to new highs and the American people are done with that. STOP SPENDING OUR MONEY! Being president isn't hitting the lottory. Washington has put us into deeper debt and Obama wants to add another $10 Trillion dollars to that debt over the next 10 years. That is just crazy. Greece is failing and the Democratic Party wants to put us on the exact same track. Unless their idea of a good outcome is the destruction of America and our way of life then they are doing a fine job of it. Call Congress and tell them to stop spending now!
Contacting the Congress is a very up-to-date citizen's congressional directory for the 112th Congress. As of July 25, 2011 there are 539 electronic contact addresses (of which 536 are Web-based contact forms), and 539 home pages known for the 540 members of the 112th Congress. Traditional ground mail addresses are available for all current members of Congress.

Find your members of Congress by clicking on your state on the map to the right or filling out the following form:
Street Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code: +

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Obama Proves To Be Left Of Reid


 Obama staked out extreme left ground during his prime time address to the nation...calling for higher taxes when even Harry Reid's latest proposal includes no new taxes, only spending cuts. This puts Obama to the left of Harry Reid, one of America's most liberal Senators. Since Obama has taken office he has gone after small business like they are an enemy of the state. Most of us work for small business and we know that these small businesses are what will grow this country out of this massive recession. We also know that raising taxes now will only make this recession and jobs creation unlikely at best. We also know that Congress has had a bipartisan agreement on raising the debt ceiling. Obama has made his point clear that he hates small business and the private sector. He will stop at nothing to do harm to this economic powerhouse.
 
Taking money out of the private sector hasn't done anything to recover our economy. Growing our debt will only make things worse in the future and he knows it. So why is Obama hell bent on shrinking our economy even more?
 
Obama has already told us who he would screw if Congress doesn't pass a bill before Aug.2. His promise to not pay Social Security and our military is what he will do if he doesn't get what he wants. So in other words, if we do raise taxes on the private sector small businesses we are screwed. If Congress doesn't pass a bill before Aug.2 he will screw the little people. When are we going to wake up to the fact that Obama is trying to put us in a lose lose situation? It's time to push Obama on his choice to destroy small businesses and the little people by passing the bipartisan bill. Let him pull the trigger and live will the consequences. It's time to play hardball with this economic idiot and call his bluff.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

No One Wants to Default... But the WH 'Moved the Goalposts'

 

 

We are in a spending crisis like none other in our history. The WH wants to keep the debt high and the only way it can do that is to stop the Republicans in Congress. We must get a handle on our debt and start paying it down now. If we raise taxes on businesses that are creating wealth in this country we will see the economy stay in recession or go into a depression.
 
The first thing we need to do is cut the massive spending Obama and the Democrats have done over the past years. We can't afford to keep going on the road the Democrats have put us on. We have to make cuts that will hurt. But the fact is we are already in economic pain and adding to our debt by another $2 trillion will only make the inevitable worse. We can't keep putting off our massive debt to the next generation. It is our debt. Both Republicans and Democrats have put us in this debt. But it is only the Republicans that are willing to do what it takes to pay off our debt without hurting the economy at the same time. Once we get our economy back on track with cuts and balancing we can debate raising taxes again. But to raise taxes now will only hurt our economy and the middle class. Almost everyone agrees with that except the class warfare liberals. They want to keep putting the pressure of our debt and taxes on those 50% of Americans that are paying federal taxes and the private sector. If we don't back off the economic attacks on our private sector they will up and leave or fold all together.
 
Obama and the Democratic Party have gotten everything they wanted over the last two years. Take a look at where it has taken us. It has made things much worse as we are still seeing unemployment go through the roof. They have had their chance to do what they wanted and they took it. The results are as clear as a bell and it is time to do something different for a change.
 
 

Friday, July 22, 2011

Should We Redefine Marriage?


The definition of marriage has been between one man and one women. Liberals want to change the nuclear family that has been successful at raising children and raising society. We have seen what has happened to children when we take away the father or the mother. Now liberals want to mess with what has worked so well for our society once again. They want to change what marriage is. So why not go all the way and make marriage whatever the individual wants it to be. Should a man be aloud to have as many wives as he wants? Should we follow Sharia Law and let men marry girls as young as 9? Why stop at changing the definition to just one man to one man or one women to one women? Why not push it to so that marriage becomes undefinable? That is the outcome that liberals want in the end.
 
Liberals have been pushing towards the destruction of the family for decades now. Maybe we need to pull them instead of pushing back just to show the slippery slope they have put us on. If you need any more proof of the importance of the nuclear family just look at the black culture. They have embraced the liberal ideology that a father and mother are but a thing of the past and unnecessary for child development. How has that worked out for them?
 
Liberals want to keep breaking what has been working for our society for millennium. We need to ask why they keep trying to break what works? Every professional will tell us that one man and one women is the best thing for child rearing. Why is it that liberals want the destruction of babies, marriage, education and our childrens inharitance? Why do liberals always go after the children as if they are lesser people? If we want to make this country great we need to start with ourselves and then our children. The liberals are wantingly destroying the next generation, that is a fact. The debate is why?

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Blacks Realize That Liberals Have Been Killing Them By Design

"…I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing’therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live."
--Deuteronomy 30:19 (NKJV)

Watch the controversial video, below:
And here’s the first video in the series:
Liberals have been using abortion to "cut crime and poverty" for decades now. This was done by design by Planned Parenthood
founder and is still being done today. Here are some pictures of what liberals have done to blacks in this country. It is evil and barbaric. Just remember our President was the only senator that voted for the killing of babies outside the womb on botched abortions. Take a close look at what these people want to do to groups of people based on color of skin and genetics. If you can't stand to look at it then maybe you should be standing against it in the future. To say nothing in the face of evil is evil.
I have written many posts in the past on how many men pressure women to get abortions against their will. It gives men a lot of power over women and that is why so many men want to keep abortion in this country. No one has the right to take another LIFE. And no one should be pressuring a women to kill the LIFE inside her.

Liberals have done a fine job of putting the providers of abortion on the hero pedestal. That says a lot about liberals. It's time we start valuing LIFE from the beginning to the end. It is our first inalienable right.

Sanger’s early writings clearly reflected Malthus’ influence. She writes:
Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease. Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents.

In another passage, she decries the burden of "human waste" on society:
It [charity] encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant [emphasis added].
She concluded,
The most serious charge that can be brought against modern "benevolence" is that is encourages the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents and dependents. These are the most dangerous elements in the world community, the most devastating curse on human progress and expression.
The Review printed an excerpt of an address Sanger gave in 1926. In it she said:
It now remains for the U.S. government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feeble-minded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.
Sanger said a "bonus" would be "wise and profitable" and "the salvation of American civilization." She presented her ideas to Mr. C. Harold Smith (of the New York Evening World) on "the welfare committee" in New York City. She said, "people must be helped to help themselves.: Any plan or program that would make them "dependent upon doles and charities" is "paternalistic" and would not be " of any permanent value." She included an essay (what she called a "program of public welfare,") entitled "We Must Breed a Race of Thoroughbreds."
?In it she argued that birth control clinics, or bureaus, should be established "in which men and women will be taught the science of parenthood and the science of breeding." For this was the way "to breed out of the race the scourges of transmissible disease, mental defect, poverty, lawlessness, crime … since these classes would be decreasing in number instead of breeding like weeds."
Her program called for women to receive birth control advice in various situations, including where:
  • the woman or man had a "transmissible" disease such as insanity, feeble-mindedness, epilepsy, syphilis, etc.;
  • the children already born were "subnormal or feeble-minded";
  • the father’s wages were "inadequate … to provide for more children."

The next time you hear a someone defending Planned Parenthood and abortion you might want to remember this post. Liberals always go against Gods Laws and the natural laws. It's time we start realizing that liberals are on the side of evil. I'm not saying liberals are all evil, they just always end up on the evil side of any issue.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

UAW Workers Keep Getting Stoned At Work. That Is The Union Way

For anyone that has worked for the UAW this should come as no surprise. When I worked for the UAW, more then half the line would go out and get high or drinking booze during their lunch. I remember one time a UAW Hi-Lo driver did some major damage to the machines on the line and almost hit a few line workers. They gave him a breathalyzer and he was both drunk and high. Thanks to the UAW he got a paid vacation and was back on the Hi-Lo drinking and driving two weeks later. It is the UAW way.

I think the next UAW contract should have a drug test and firing for any drug or alcohol abuses. The drug test alone would clear our 1/4 of the workers. But we all know the UAW would never let the Big Three drug test their members because they know the truth about them. Just see what they do outside the UAW halls if you want an awakening.

The thing is most of the workers are clean and hate the fact that such a large portion of the UAW population have drug and alcohol abuses while at work. It was also common knowledge that the Hi-Lo drivers are almost always the highons or drunks.

The income that these union members make would make anyone happy. If the UAW wants to have a decent name for itself they better start getting rid of the dead wood within it's membership. If the Big Three want anyone to buy their cars they need to start coming down harder on these union idiots that put us all at risk with their products. Let alone putting their own members at risk when they get screwed up at work.

The American people are watching the unions and we are not liking what we see. It's now wonder why union members have become one of the most hated professions. If the Big Three doesn't get control of it's workforce we will be bailing them out for a third and for Chrysler a fourth time. I don't know about you but I'm getting sick and tired have bailing these companies out when they keep harboring this kind of culture.

What are your thoughts on this constant problem with the UAW?

Open Thread On The Debt Crisis and Big Government

We all know that it is the private sector that grows our economy. Thanks to Obama we all know that big government retards economic growth and grows debt and the burdon on the private sector. There is no reason why the public sector should be making so much more then the private sector employees.

The problem is these public sector employees are part of a union that will sooner destroy the private sector then to have their pay and benefits brought back into line with reality.

This is what the private sector thinks about Washington:
This not the first time that Mr. Wynn has spoken so bluntly about the administration and his feelings about policies that are holding back the recovery.  In April, Wynn was on Fox News with Neil Cavuto and talked about “the gross irresponsibility of the government”:

Monday, July 18, 2011

Redistributing Wealth By Any Other Name Is Still Socialism


These Democrats just don't get it. When they are faced with the reality of what they want to do to the citizens of this country they run away. If the media was doing their job the Democrats wouldn't be able to keep hiding the truth of what they are doing. They know that once the American people wake up to what the Democrats are doing to them they would run for the hills.

We all know that Democrats want to have the power to take away wealth from the private sector so that they can control it, not you. If you pay federal income tax then you are too "rich" to vote Democratic Party. They might not start at your income but they will finish at your income sooner or later. Only half of Americans pay federal income tax. That means that if you are paying federal income tax or work for a company that pays federal income tax it's coming out of your pocket.

If Democrats have their way companies like Ford will have to pay much higher taxes in the future. That means they will have less profit to share with it's employees the UAW and stockholders. If you want to be a brainwashed Democratic Party zombie go right ahead and do it. But when things don't go the way you thought they would, just like they have for the past few years, don't blame the Republicans. When your company fires you or has little or no profits to share don't blame us. We wanted you to be in charge of distributing your wealth. And when a car become too expensive to buy new, don't blame us. We didn't want to add more taxes to the "rich". And when companies can't make a profit in this country and move overseas just remember who put that tax on them.

When Bush gave every citizen in this country a check on the recession he got from Clinton people used them to buy what they wanted. And I sold a lot of cars those months because people had the cash to buy things they wouldn't have. The Obama Stimulus hasn't even been felt by us and that is because we never seen one penny of that money. It never went to the private sector because it was used to grow our government, not jobs.

It's time we all realize what happens when Democrats get a hold of our money. They spend it for us and then they want more. No one has been saved by the Obama Stimulus. Two years later and those same jobs are on the line again. States are still going bankrupt and teachers are still getting fired. And we all own $45,000 for nothing.