Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Common Sense

This 2,700 page health care bill must be worse then we know. If it was so great then why are they acting like cowards by not putting their names to it? The Progressives engineered this health care bill and they can't even get their own party to agree on it. Obama and Congress have been telling us this bill is good for us but they hide it from us. The president it acting desperate bringing in the fainting people and the sick people that will die if they don't get this bill passed. If those people existed why couldn't Obama fine some real ones dieing without care. And once this thing gets jamed down our throats we will have been addicted to the intitlement program until it can no longer exist. Just like SSI and Medicare. If we add 30 million people to free health care insurance where will we get all the doctors to treat them all? Yeh no one will die waiting for a doctor because you just gave people a new car and they want to drive it right away. This bill will be the killer and we need to stop this bill from going through or it will be too late. The left wing blogs are saying that the abortion in the bill actually help cut costs. Is that what we have become?  If they don't mind killing babies the elderly should be a breeze to kill. Our government has no right to give us our rights. Only God gives us rights if we can keep them. Governement takes rights away.


  1. Political cowardice at its finest

  2. White House desperation. PresBO is going on Fox News

    In an act of true desperation to pass Democrat health reform, President Obama will be interviewed by Fox News' Bret Baier on Wednesday, March 17.

    The White House has said that Fox isn't a real news, so this must be a propaganda push.

  3. Question One Option to Passing this BILL as I Understand It is To Take The Senate Vote in December and For The House to Pass a Rule and WITHOUT a Vote Enact Nobama Care into Legislation! If This BILL Is So Good Why Do The Liberals Want to Basiclly Pass This Piece of Crap Without A Vote! Call it a Rule Call it ANYTHING You Want This Makes Constitutional Law MOOT! If This Is What Occurrs The LIBS Have Changed Our Way Of Governing! WHy Do We Need House Of Representitives if This Is The NEW Way of Governing.

  4. Stupak Amendment Exposes Obamacare’s Dirty Little Secret: Eugenics by Lori Ziganto - March 16, 2010 - 18:24 America/Chicago - 2 Comments

    The other day, when Bart Stupak revealed that he was told “If you pass the Stupak Amendment, more children will be born and therefore it will cost us millions more”, I mentioned that it was no real surprise. Abortion is an agenda to the Left, it’s not about life or some perceived ‘choice’. I said that it just exposes the face underneath the mask a bit more; Now, it isn’t just about funding abortion, but using it as a cost-saving tool. James Taranto of The Wall Street Journal agrees:

    In order to be effective, a policy of using abortion as a cost-cutting measure would have to aim at preventing the birth of babies with such pre-existing conditions. The goal would be not a reduction in the number of babies, but an “improvement” in the “quality” (narrowly defined in economic terms) of the babies who are born. This is known as eugenics.

    Eugenics, indeed. See, not only can individual women be “punished by a baby,” but so can the entire World, evidently. This is one of the left’s dirty little secrets; factions of the left have been encouraging eugenics for years. The “green” movement, for instance, has population control at its core. An example from Diane Francis, of the Financial Post, who in her article entitled The Real Inconvenient Truth: The Whole World Needs to Adopt China’s One Child Policy, echoes the true beliefs of many global warming embracers. You know, like the majority of the Democrats in Congress and our President.

  5. BO said we need to be brave when they are doing the most cowardice action they can do. They aren't leaders just a bunch of wussies. Is this bill so bad that even the people that are backing it don't want their names on it for political reasons? I see the left wing just keep hitting thei9r talking points from the Klan.

  6. Chris, we get our talking points from the KLAN? Comeon, you can do better than that. Hyperbole isn't your style. Leave that to the loud mouths in your parties.

  7. Chris - I listened to the voice over. A bit distracting if one wanted to read your post first, but the other way around worked. I found the information presented by the author consistant with my knowledge and understanding of historical events - politically speaking. And you may be surprised, but by and large i concur - except we have a slight differance of opinion when he gave his conclusion. I can see where he - and you by extrapulation, was headed. None the less, it was a good history lesson, accurate as far as i could tell - just slightly but significantly differant drawn conclusions. But then historians seldom differ on the facts - only the lesson those facts present.

  8. Joey you do have the same talking points as the KKKoffee party klan. vomamike thank you for being honest. Are you a history teacher?

  9. Vomamike - What video are you talking about, the "We are a Republic, Not a Democracy" video? Just not sure what you are referring to.

  10. Chris, so were the Republicans "cowards" when they used the same procedure 22 times?

  11. Comrade Bruce, no they weren't "cowards" as they were using it as intended, for amendments and such. Why are the Hypocrats afraid of obeying the Constitution of These United States and giving an Up or Down vote?:

    Democrats: We're so proud of our awesome takeover of health care that we won't go on record as actually having voted for it!


    House Majority Leader Stenky Hoyer and Speaker Nancy "Stretch" Pelosi hit the press circuit earlier today to defend the so-called Slaughter Solution, an unprecedented method for enacting government-run health care. This last-gasp Democrat attempt to squeeze out a health care bill would "deem" the Senate health care bill as passed without a direct vote.

    Legal experts believe such a maneuver contravenes Article I, Section 7 of the U.S Constitution.

    It also compounds a callous disregard for the truth and American traditions:

    Democrats have already hidden 60 percent of the cost of the Senate bill, effected an obscenely partisan change in Massachusetts law to keep the bill moving, pledged more than a billion taxpayer dollars to buy votes for the bill, and packed the bill with an unconstitutional individual mandate and provisions that violate the First Amendment. It’s almost as if, to paraphrase comedian Lewis Black, Democrats spent a whole year, umm, desecrating the Constitution and at the last minute went, “Oh! Missed a spot!”

    In other words, this health care overhaul is so crazy good the leadership can't even convince Democrats to openly vote on it.

    Hoyer's attempted to deflect criticism by citing cases where Republicans used a "self-executing" rule.

    Oh, the Republicans used it, right? Well, Stenky, could we please have the list of bills and laws passed using this method? There aren't any. It's been used to add and remove amendments, not pass entire bills without a vote. And certainly not for a giant, new and unaffordable entitlement program. And certainly not one that has no bipartisan support whatsoever.

    Some have argued that the "Gephardt Rule" (House Rule XXVII) -in which a similar "self-executing rule" "deemed" the house to have voted on a new debt ceiling, is valid precedent. Wrong. That rule was for a joint resolution--not a bill. A joint resolution is a guide to the house. It is not a bill under the constitution, and has no force of law. Because a president has nothing to do with a resolution, a self-executing rule is valid for a resolution, but not for a bill.

    As Michael McConnell -- director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School -- explained yesterday, the Slaughter Solution is clearly unconsitutional.

    So, yes, let's create the largest entitlement program in history, but not require any House Democrat to actually vote on it.

    Let's require everyone in the country to purchase a product (health insurance), but exempt Congress, without having an actual vote on the matter.

    Maybe they'll pass a rule that says midterm elections aren't necessary either. After all, that's clearly in the Constitution as well -- along with how bills become laws.

    I guess this is the "fundamental change" we were promised.

  12. Well, once again the conservatives answer a question put forth by the regressives, but the regressives refuse to answer a question put forth by a conservative. The Hypocrats: Party of NO ANSWERS.

    Hypocrats are truly despicable people. How could that many people have been dropped on their heads as children?

  13. John Bruce only runs with the talking points he's been given by moveon,Soros,unions,MSDNC. He didn't realize that the Slaughter rule has never ever been used like this in it's history. Or maybe he does but he wants to cause false doubt. We are seeing what the Democratic party is made of. People are growing to hate you progressives and the Democratic Party is going to be holding the bad of anger and discontent.


Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.