All In All Wont Be Confused With Tea Party Rally, Or Be Covered By State Run Media The Same Way. You Know Just Illegals Being Illegals! Wonder Where They Got There Home Made Signs At.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... Comrade FAILk's kind of people!
Here are some other hilarious stories of the regressive's violent, racist radical rallies:
Irony Alive And Well Among Progressive Human Smuggling Supporters May 3, 2010 http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/05/irony-alive-and-well-among-progressive-human-smuggling-supporters/
As has been widely covered, thousands of Progressives marched in support of human smuggling last weekend. One of the reports is so densely filled with delicious irony that it has to be read more than once to fully comprehend.
It turns out that some former Anarchists-turned-Fascists got their asses kicked in San Francisco by some peaceful Progressives. Again, delicious! But it gets better.
“They said we were racists, and we were against them, and against their town, and against San Francisco,” said Parker Wilson with the Bay Area National Anarchists. “What they were saying, they said we need to get out and called us racists, and that we need to go home. And then they just attacked my friends and me.”
So a group of Progressive supporters of human trafficking want the former Anarchists-turned-Fascists to “get out?” That’s rich!
Funny how an Anarchist turned Fascist. They must have a lot in common, in that they are both products of the political Left. More info on the former anarchists is available here. ----- Progressive Supporters Of Human Smuggling Turn Violent In California May 3, 2010 http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/05/progressive-supporters-of-human-smuggling-turn-violent-in-california/
Progressives marching in California, in support of human smuggling into the United States, turned violent over the weekend, committing various acts of vandalism to make the point that they are peaceful – or else. The laughable quote from the article:
he wasn’t sure if the damage was caused by people marching in support of immigrants’ rights, or if the group was “infiltrated by anarchists.”
Um, they are not infiltrators if the Progressives are working in coordination with them, which they are.
Progressives: The Movement In Favor Of Human Smuggling – No Matter How Many People Are Murdered Or Raped In The Process.
Did you here about the police getting set up in Detroit? They killed one and injured 4 police officers. Things are getting much worse under this Obama and Democratic Congress.
Using Nazis Emblems To Show Disapproval For Law Shows Also That Education Is Not At The Top Of These Protesters List! Had Their Education Been More Informative They Would Have Learned In Nazi Germany They Would Have Been Rounded Up And "Poof All Gone"!
Freedom Is Not Free And Good Education Is Priceless To Bad Their Money Was Not Better Spent.
Well Joe, you never stop your spin do you? You regressives say that states enforcing federal law is tantamount to fascism and Nazism. Tell me that isn't spin, and that you didn't spin it with the best of them. You were positively hysterical when this AZ law passed; look back on some of your posts and it's hilarious how bunched your panties were! I'm not even taking a shot at you here, it's lol funny how veklempt you were!
You regressives love to spin the AZ law as conservatives hating immigration, and make it sound like conservatives don't even want legal immigration. You are nothing but spin. Give me a break.
The march for human smuggling, I'm sure you didn't hear about it because you're stuck in your regressive echo-chamber. Did you hear about the riots listening to your MSM mainline?
What else do you call the smuggling of illegals across the American border from Mexico Joe? Human smuggling, smuggling of humans. Unless you think Hispanics are less than human? And that's what you regressives were rioting for. Human smuggling. Once again, the regressives are on the law-breaking side.
John, i'm okay with you thinking that. I can't change it and despite everything i might try there's nothing that will make you intellectually honest about this situation.
You and i both know why i opposed the bill. Your smart enough to understand some of the push behind it.
Despite yours and others claims that this bill didn't have a racial or ethnic hostility to it it became obvious very quickly that the AZ legislature has decided to attack the Hispanic population in that state. they followed up the immigration bill with one covering Teachers with heavy accents. Add to that a strange bill targeting a ethnic studies in a region with a huge ethnic population adds up to serious xenophobia.
You're literally an idiot Joe. Just because you claim something doesn't make it so. Where is the racial and ethnic hostility Joe? Where is the attack on the Hispanic population Joe? And now you're making up nonsense about legislation on teachers with accents? You have gone over the edge dude. Look at the hate and fear-mongering you are perpetrating! You and the other regressives didn't even read the bill before you started crying Nazi! LOL, how embarrassed you should be. But you just keep on keeping on with your talking points. Getting all hysterical. Did you boycott Arizona Iced Tea (made in, I believe, NY)?!?! LMAO
So Joe, when you smuggle humans into These United States, what do YOU call it? Is there a politically correct term that you regressives have invented? I notice you can't really bring yourself to answer that question. But I do love how you smear the AZ police, as if Hispanic-American police will be profiling other Hispanics. Trust them with a gun but don't trust them to carry out a law! As if they couldn't already profile before this law! As if you make any kind of sense. Laughable. Try to keep from rioting against a federal law Joe, it really makes it so apparent what a bunch of whack-jobs you really are.
And Joe, you never ever ever did answer my question from so long ago, which was what are YOUR brilliant suggestions?!?! Your state is being literally invaded, your Federal government has and will do nothing ... and the regressives have no ideas, LOL
Oh, and yes I do know why you opposed this bill Joe; because the Hypocrats told you that's what you should do. What are you, a Bill Press man? That seems about your brand of moonbat lunacy.
Here Joe, give this a listen. This guy is hardly a conservative as far as I know, especially working for CNN. As he says, parts of this AZ law is "word for word" taken from the federal law.
"to attack the Hispanic population in that state." Correction ILLEGAL Hispanic population. Read the bill, I dare you. http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
A. NO OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR 17 OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY ADOPT A POLICY THAT LIMITS OR 18 RESTRICTS THE ENFORCEMENT OF(OH Looky--->) FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO LESS THAN THE FULL 19 EXTENT (another look see-->)PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW. 20 B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT(must have violated another law) MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY 21 OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS 22 STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS 23 UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE (reasonable) ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, 24 WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE 25 PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE (another look see--->)FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c)....
Wow Joe you are pushing it. Is the fed a racial law? AZ and the Fed have the same law but AZ will inforce it? That wasn't racism when the fed does it and it isn't racism when a Republican does it. You libs always go way overboard on everything when a Republicasn is involved. You are like Pavolfs dog.
Fiddle, i never used the term NAZI. I never compared you or other conservaties to them. I said the policies were racist. And in that vein i can say that conservatives have marched with white supremecists, made common cause with current racial segragationists and others of that ilk.
Bob Jones University has apologized for racist policies including a one-time ban on interracial dating that wasn't lifted until nine years ago and its unwillingness to admit black students
"We failed to accurately represent the Lord and to fulfill the commandment to love others as ourselves. For these failures we are profoundly sorry. Though no known antagonism toward minorities or expressions of racism on a personal level have ever been tolerated on our campus, we allowed institutional policies to remain in place that were racially hurtful," the statement said.
The interracial dating ban was lifted in March 2000, not long after the policy became an issue in the Republican presidential primary that year. Then-candidate George W. Bush was criticized when he spoke at the school during one of his first campaign stops in the state after losing in New Hampshire.
So go call other people names. Your not even referencing my views but those of other conservatives.
Mark, i posted the sections i had a problem with in a prior post so i know what is written.
As you know Mark, or maybe you don't, the law was amended becuase the section covering legal contact did not specify criminal activity and it still doesn't. I know you get hung up on details, but the law suggested legal contact which includes victims of crimes and witnesses of crimes too, along with people seen at other police functions. The law now includes civil infractions which are not crimes, like not cutting your lawn..etc.
you know call me names make fun of me thats all cool, but get your information correct first.
And by the way Socialism has been arround a lot longer then this form of government. If socialism doesn't work we can always go back to the constitution and old way of doing things.
Isn't it ironic that Bloomberg is concerned about profiling and racism in NY, now that it is revealed that the SUV-bomber is not a TEA Partier but rather an Arab? How could the NY police POSSIBLY profile when they don't have the anti-illegal immigration laws that AZ has?!?! LOL
Bloomberg Warns of Backlash Against People Who Want to Kill Us
So nice of Michael Bloomberg to concern himself with the rights of Muslim extremists. A day after suggesting it was someone upset with ObamaCare who tried the carbombing of Times Square, the New York Mayor today ominously warned against any backlash against those who want us dead.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg says New York City "will not tolerate any bias" following the arrest of a U.S. citizen from Pakistan in the Times Square car bombing attempt.
Bloomberg said Tuesday that also applies to potential backlash against Muslim New Yorkers.
The mayor said there are "a few bad apples" among any groups. He also cited New York's long history of accepting cultures from the around the world.
Would he feel the same way if it was a Tea Partier who was arrested, as you know he and Katie Couric hoped it would be?
Of course even after 9/11 there was no backlash, so why is he so concerned?
On 9/30, Frank Silva Roque was convicted in Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona, for the hate crime of shooting dead Balbir Singh Sodhi, a Sikh American. Mr. Sodhi had been standing in front of his gasoline station in Mesa, just days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in Washington and New York, when Roque drove by in a pickup and fired at him. He was the first murder victim of the 9/11-related hate crime backlash in America. Roque's conviction and maximum sentencing goes straight to the heart of U.S. justice: hate crimes will not be tolerated.
FBI sees leap in anti-Muslim hate crimes 9/11 attacks blamed for bias Tuesday, November 26, 2002
The most dramatic change noted by the report was a more than 1,600 percent increase in reported hate crimes against Muslims -- a jump from 28 hate incidents in 2000 to 481 last year.
Another noticeable increase in 2001 was among religious-bias incidents. Anti-Islamic religion incidents were previously the second least reported, but in 2001, they became the second highest reported among religious-bias incidents, growing by more than 1,600 percent over the 2000 volume. In 2001, reported data showed there were 481 incidents made up of 546 offenses having 554 victims of crimes motivated by bias toward the Islamic religion.
JHC Joe, an eighth grader knows what lawful contact is. And yes I know the law has had amendments attached it, to better define the terms lawful contact for you rioting folks to understand, since you all are "hung up on details". What did you expect them to included every law on the books under the heading of lawful contact. "which includes victims of crimes and witnesses of crimes too" But still a part of the law is this: "UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE" To arrest victims and/or witnesses of crimes is not reasonable nor practicable. And if this happens the law states that those who become victims of this type of unreasonable and impracticable attempt can sue the officer and it's dept. Talk about 'getting your information correct first'.
I stand corrected Joe. Or actually, the author of the story stands corrected, but I posted the comment so that goes for me as well. But I'm sure Bloomberg would not be so concerned if it had been a TEA Party member who did it (as he hoped). I'm sure he wouldn't have shown such a call for restraint, instead he would be calling for the limiting of the First Amendment. These are things we should all be concerned about Joe, I'm sure you would agree with me.
Mark, despite what you and your eighth grade education think, all the research i have done shows that lawful contact was not restricted to arrest, detention or other probable cause type issues. You did not and still don't have to be guilty, have probable cause or commit any criminal activity to be questioned by the police.
Why do we spend all this time going around and round trying to teach you what is correct? Just accept what i say and it'll save you posting four or five posts of embarrassing nonsense.
But back to the subject, the law now allows for completely minor civil infractions to be considered "legal contact". Lawn not mowed low enough..barking dog complaint etc.
Mark, details make the world go round. yours and my freedoms are hung up on details just like this bill. If you were a hispanic citizen you'd want the details sorted out. Remember laws that are too vague or offer little in legally defined terms are often overturned. The legislature did the right thing in defining the terms.
All In All Wont Be Confused With Tea Party Rally, Or Be Covered By State Run Media The Same Way. You Know Just Illegals Being Illegals! Wonder Where They Got There Home Made Signs At.
ReplyDeleteBWAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... Comrade FAILk's kind of people!
ReplyDeleteHere are some other hilarious stories of the regressive's violent, racist radical rallies:
Irony Alive And Well Among Progressive Human Smuggling Supporters
May 3, 2010
http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/05/irony-alive-and-well-among-progressive-human-smuggling-supporters/
As has been widely covered, thousands of Progressives marched in support of human smuggling last weekend. One of the reports is so densely filled with delicious irony that it has to be read more than once to fully comprehend.
It turns out that some former Anarchists-turned-Fascists got their asses kicked in San Francisco by some peaceful Progressives. Again, delicious! But it gets better.
“They said we were racists, and we were against them, and against their town, and against San Francisco,” said Parker Wilson with the Bay Area National Anarchists. “What they were saying, they said we need to get out and called us racists, and that we need to go home. And then they just attacked my friends and me.”
So a group of Progressive supporters of human trafficking want the former Anarchists-turned-Fascists to “get out?” That’s rich!
Funny how an Anarchist turned Fascist. They must have a lot in common, in that they are both products of the political Left.
More info on the former anarchists is available here.
-----
Progressive Supporters Of Human Smuggling Turn Violent In California
May 3, 2010
http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/05/progressive-supporters-of-human-smuggling-turn-violent-in-california/
Progressives marching in California, in support of human smuggling into the United States, turned violent over the weekend, committing various acts of vandalism to make the point that they are peaceful – or else.
The laughable quote from the article:
he wasn’t sure if the damage was caused by people marching in support of immigrants’ rights, or if the group was “infiltrated by anarchists.”
Um, they are not infiltrators if the Progressives are working in coordination with them, which they are.
Progressives: The Movement In Favor Of Human Smuggling – No Matter How Many People Are Murdered Or Raped In The Process.
Did you here about the police getting set up in Detroit? They killed one and injured 4 police officers. Things are getting much worse under this Obama and Democratic Congress.
ReplyDeleteUsing Nazis Emblems To Show Disapproval For Law Shows Also That Education Is Not At The Top Of These Protesters List! Had Their Education Been More Informative They Would Have Learned In Nazi Germany They Would Have Been Rounded Up And "Poof All Gone"!
ReplyDeleteFreedom Is Not Free And Good Education Is Priceless To Bad Their Money Was Not Better Spent.
No, I didn't hear about that, but I just looked it up. How terribly sad. Detroit is a war-zone, thanks Democrats.
ReplyDeleteJohn, I missed the march for human smuggling. When was that? I'm guessing never but that doesn't stop the spin does it?
ReplyDeleteWell Joe, you never stop your spin do you? You regressives say that states enforcing federal law is tantamount to fascism and Nazism. Tell me that isn't spin, and that you didn't spin it with the best of them. You were positively hysterical when this AZ law passed; look back on some of your posts and it's hilarious how bunched your panties were! I'm not even taking a shot at you here, it's lol funny how veklempt you were!
ReplyDeleteYou regressives love to spin the AZ law as conservatives hating immigration, and make it sound like conservatives don't even want legal immigration. You are nothing but spin. Give me a break.
The march for human smuggling, I'm sure you didn't hear about it because you're stuck in your regressive echo-chamber. Did you hear about the riots listening to your MSM mainline?
What else do you call the smuggling of illegals across the American border from Mexico Joe? Human smuggling, smuggling of humans. Unless you think Hispanics are less than human? And that's what you regressives were rioting for. Human smuggling. Once again, the regressives are on the law-breaking side.
If they close the borders where will we get our pot and drugs from? That was a sign at the human smuggling rally.
ReplyDeleteJohn, i'm okay with you thinking that. I can't change it and despite everything i might try there's nothing that will make you intellectually honest about this situation.
ReplyDeleteYou and i both know why i opposed the bill. Your smart enough to understand some of the push behind it.
Despite yours and others claims that this bill didn't have a racial or ethnic hostility to it it became obvious very quickly that the AZ legislature has decided to attack the Hispanic population in that state. they followed up the immigration bill with one covering Teachers with heavy accents. Add to that a strange bill targeting a ethnic studies in a region with a huge ethnic population adds up to serious xenophobia.
You're literally an idiot Joe. Just because you claim something doesn't make it so. Where is the racial and ethnic hostility Joe? Where is the attack on the Hispanic population Joe? And now you're making up nonsense about legislation on teachers with accents? You have gone over the edge dude. Look at the hate and fear-mongering you are perpetrating! You and the other regressives didn't even read the bill before you started crying Nazi! LOL, how embarrassed you should be. But you just keep on keeping on with your talking points. Getting all hysterical. Did you boycott Arizona Iced Tea (made in, I believe, NY)?!?! LMAO
ReplyDeleteSo Joe, when you smuggle humans into These United States, what do YOU call it? Is there a politically correct term that you regressives have invented? I notice you can't really bring yourself to answer that question. But I do love how you smear the AZ police, as if Hispanic-American police will be profiling other Hispanics. Trust them with a gun but don't trust them to carry out a law! As if they couldn't already profile before this law! As if you make any kind of sense. Laughable. Try to keep from rioting against a federal law Joe, it really makes it so apparent what a bunch of whack-jobs you really are.
And Joe, you never ever ever did answer my question from so long ago, which was what are YOUR brilliant suggestions?!?! Your state is being literally invaded, your Federal government has and will do nothing ... and the regressives have no ideas, LOL
Oh, and yes I do know why you opposed this bill Joe; because the Hypocrats told you that's what you should do. What are you, a Bill Press man? That seems about your brand of moonbat lunacy.
ReplyDeleteHere Joe, give this a listen. This guy is hardly a conservative as far as I know, especially working for CNN. As he says, parts of this AZ law is "word for word" taken from the federal law.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/05/cafferty-rips-o.html
"to attack the Hispanic population in that state."
ReplyDeleteCorrection ILLEGAL Hispanic population.
Read the bill, I dare you.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
A. NO OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR
17 OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY ADOPT A POLICY THAT LIMITS OR
18 RESTRICTS THE ENFORCEMENT OF(OH Looky--->) FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO LESS THAN THE FULL
19 EXTENT (another look see-->)PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW.
20 B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT(must have violated another law) MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY
21 OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS
22 STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS
23 UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE (reasonable) ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE,
24 WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE
25 PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE (another look see--->)FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c)....
Wow Joe you are pushing it. Is the fed a racial law? AZ and the Fed have the same law but AZ will inforce it? That wasn't racism when the fed does it and it isn't racism when a Republican does it. You libs always go way overboard on everything when a Republicasn is involved. You are like Pavolfs dog.
ReplyDeleteHere's the bottom line, Batman:
ReplyDeleteConservatives have never marched with nazis or rubbed shoulders with them at rallies or made common cause with them at protests.
Liberals do it all the time with socialists, communists and various other America-hating rabble. I think you would call them fellow travelers.
Fiddle, i never used the term NAZI. I never compared you or other conservaties to them. I said the policies were racist. And in that vein i can say that conservatives have marched with white supremecists, made common cause with current racial segragationists and others of that ilk.
ReplyDeleteBob Jones University has apologized for racist policies including a one-time ban on interracial dating that wasn't lifted until nine years ago and its unwillingness to admit black students
"We failed to accurately represent the Lord and to fulfill the commandment to love others as ourselves. For these failures we are profoundly sorry. Though no known antagonism toward minorities or expressions of racism on a personal level have ever been tolerated on our campus, we allowed institutional policies to remain in place that were racially hurtful," the statement said.
The interracial dating ban was lifted in March 2000, not long after the policy became an issue in the Republican presidential primary that year. Then-candidate George W. Bush was criticized when he spoke at the school during one of his first campaign stops in the state after losing in New Hampshire.
So go call other people names. Your not even referencing my views but those of other conservatives.
Mark, i posted the sections i had a problem with in a prior post so i know what is written.
ReplyDeleteAs you know Mark, or maybe you don't, the law was amended becuase the section covering legal contact did not specify criminal activity and it still doesn't. I know you get hung up on details, but the law suggested legal contact which includes victims of crimes and witnesses of crimes too, along with people seen at other police functions. The law now includes civil infractions which are not crimes, like not cutting your lawn..etc.
you know call me names make fun of me thats all cool, but get your information correct first.
So what! Who cares? The teabaggers have been doing this a thousand time worse. Watch MSNBC for a change you dumba$$e$.
ReplyDeleteAnd by the way Socialism has been arround a lot longer then this form of government. If socialism doesn't work we can always go back to the constitution and old way of doing things.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous If Education Is Priceless You Are Bankrupt!
ReplyDeletelmMFao.
ReplyDeletethats some funny stuff AL.
Ditto what Joe said Al.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it ironic that Bloomberg is concerned about profiling and racism in NY, now that it is revealed that the SUV-bomber is not a TEA Partier but rather an Arab? How could the NY police POSSIBLY profile when they don't have the anti-illegal immigration laws that AZ has?!?! LOL
http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/05/bloomberg-warns-of-backlash-against.html
Bloomberg Warns of Backlash Against People Who Want to Kill Us
So nice of Michael Bloomberg to concern himself with the rights of Muslim extremists. A day after suggesting it was someone upset with ObamaCare who tried the carbombing of Times Square, the New York Mayor today ominously warned against any backlash against those who want us dead.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg says New York City "will not tolerate any bias" following the arrest of a U.S. citizen from Pakistan in the Times Square car bombing attempt.
Bloomberg said Tuesday that also applies to potential backlash against Muslim New Yorkers.
The mayor said there are "a few bad apples" among any groups. He also cited New York's long history of accepting cultures from the around the world.
Would he feel the same way if it was a Tea Partier who was arrested, as you know he and Katie Couric hoped it would be?
Of course even after 9/11 there was no backlash, so why is he so concerned?
After 9/11 there was no backlash? huh?
ReplyDeleteOn 9/30, Frank Silva Roque was convicted in Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona, for the hate crime of shooting dead Balbir Singh Sodhi, a Sikh American. Mr. Sodhi had been standing in front of his gasoline station in Mesa, just days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in Washington and New York, when Roque drove by in a pickup and fired at him. He was the first murder victim of the 9/11-related hate crime backlash in America. Roque's conviction and maximum sentencing goes straight to the heart of U.S. justice: hate crimes will not be tolerated.
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/oct03/103003protectrights.htm
FBI sees leap in anti-Muslim hate crimes
9/11 attacks blamed for bias
Tuesday, November 26, 2002
The most dramatic change noted by the report was a more than 1,600 percent increase in reported hate crimes against Muslims -- a jump from 28 hate incidents in 2000 to 481 last year.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/11/26/MN224441.DTL#ixzz0myv7BA9r
Another noticeable increase in 2001 was among religious-bias incidents. Anti-Islamic religion
incidents were previously the second least reported, but in 2001, they became the second highest reported among religious-bias incidents, growing by more than 1,600 percent over the 2000 volume. In 2001, reported data showed there were 481 incidents made up of 546 offenses having 554 victims of crimes motivated by bias toward the Islamic religion.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/01hate.pdf
JHC Joe, an eighth grader knows what lawful contact is. And yes I know the law has had amendments attached it, to better define the terms lawful contact for you rioting folks to understand, since you all are "hung up on details". What did you expect them to included every law on the books under the heading of lawful contact.
ReplyDelete"which includes victims of crimes and witnesses of crimes too"
But still a part of the law is this: "UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE"
To arrest victims and/or witnesses of crimes is not reasonable nor practicable. And if this happens the law states that those who become victims of this type of unreasonable and impracticable attempt can sue the officer and it's dept.
Talk about 'getting your information correct first'.
What up with all the socialist coming out in the open. Is socialism in now? I even got a "Social Justice" thing at work today from my union.
ReplyDeleteI stand corrected Joe. Or actually, the author of the story stands corrected, but I posted the comment so that goes for me as well. But I'm sure Bloomberg would not be so concerned if it had been a TEA Party member who did it (as he hoped). I'm sure he wouldn't have shown such a call for restraint, instead he would be calling for the limiting of the First Amendment. These are things we should all be concerned about Joe, I'm sure you would agree with me.
ReplyDeleteMark, despite what you and your eighth grade education think, all the research i have done shows that lawful contact was not restricted to arrest, detention or other probable cause type issues. You did not and still don't have to be guilty, have probable cause or commit any criminal activity to be questioned by the police.
ReplyDeleteWhy do we spend all this time going around and round trying to teach you what is correct? Just accept what i say and it'll save you posting four or five posts of embarrassing nonsense.
But back to the subject, the law now allows for completely minor civil infractions to be considered "legal contact". Lawn not mowed low enough..barking dog complaint etc.
Mark, details make the world go round. yours and my freedoms are hung up on details just like this bill. If you were a hispanic citizen you'd want the details sorted out. Remember laws that are too vague or offer little in legally defined terms are often overturned. The legislature did the right thing in defining the terms.