I think this is a great idea. It's time they get a taste of their own boycotting medicine. Most people in Arizona go to California for vacation. In fact California should be boycotted by the 65% of Americans that agree with Arizona's new immigration law. I'm calling for all conservatives and legal US citizens to boycott California and any other city or state that wants to play the boycotting game. It's a lot more fun when we all play the same game now isn't it. In fact I would like to see people start looking to spend their money in Arizona to show them solidarity. It's time we fight fire with fire and stop the liberal bullying game. Michigan is looking at introducing the same law here. And we could really use the American conservatives help on countering any li
beral retaliation.
It is a small world after all. And California is going to learn that where there is an action there is an opposite reaction,now the conservatives are awake. They can have their boycott and we will have our. Just think of all the food California produces that we wont buy now.
Here is where we can all show our support of Gov Brewer.
ReplyDeleteBy signing the AZ support petition below.
http://www.janbrewer.com
Better yet, I think Arizona should hand out free bus tickets to every sanctuary city in the nation for any resident who wants one.
ReplyDeleteIllegal and tired of being harassed? Move to San Francisco or LA!
Great idea. It's time to fight fire with fire when it comes to teaching these libs how dumb their idealitic and not well thought out their plans are. And California rather get a hand out from we the people to support them and their policies then to make laws or inforce laws that will offend criminals. That is why our prisons are full of liberals.
ReplyDeletePolitico: Arizona GOP Gov. Jan Brewer has signed a law banning the state’s schools from teaching ethnic studies classes.
ReplyDeleteBrewer signed the bill Tuesday that targets Chicano studies programs currently being taught in Tucson schools. […]
The law prohibits the teaching of any classes that promote “the overthrow of the United States government,” “resentment toward a race or class of people,” “are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group” or “advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.”
are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group” or “advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.”
ReplyDeleteBut its not about ethnicity is it? lmao. You republicans fall over your feet trying to make it easy to show how bigotted you are.
Joe why are you Democrat all for the slave trade? By calling us racist because we want equal justice for all while at the same time you are pushing for the slave trade of Mexicans. That is what this "racist" BS is all about. It is your left wing MO. Call us the racist first while you are back dooring slaves to work in factories. Why do you back the slave trade? Do yopu have a illegal cleaning your house for next to nothing? Do you hold the fact that all you have to do is make one call and she is deported? Do you sanction the misuse of these illegals in the drug and sex trade when they come here to "find a better life"? You Democrats are a sick racist group. What gives you the right to want to keep the slave trade alive and well in this country?
ReplyDeleteConsidering how Arizona’s immigration bill (SB1070) was so incorrectly reported. Here is HB2281 (the bill also contains new guidelines for student disciplinary action). Below are the parts of the bill that pertain to ethnic studies:
ReplyDeleteBe it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Title 15, chapter 1, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding sections 15-111 and 15-112, to read:
15-111. Declaration of policy
THE LEGISLATURE FINDS AND DECLARES THAT PUBLIC SCHOOL PUPILS SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO TREAT AND VALUE EACH OTHER AS INDIVIDUALS AND NOT BE TAUGHT TO RESENT OR HATE OTHER RACES OR CLASSES OF PEOPLE.
15-112. Prohibited courses and classes; enforcement
A. A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IN THIS STATE SHALL NOT INCLUDE IN ITS PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION ANY COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. PROMOTE THE OVERTHROW OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
2. PROMOTE RESENTMENT TOWARD A RACE OR CLASS OF PEOPLE.
3. ARE DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR PUPILS OF A PARTICULAR ETHNIC GROUP.
4. ADVOCATE ETHNIC SOLIDARITY INSTEAD OF THE TREATMENT OF PUPILS AS INDIVIDUALS.
B. IF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DETERMINES THAT A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IS IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A, THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SHALL NOTIFY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A. IF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DETERMINES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SUBSECTION A WITHIN SIXTY DAYS AFTER A NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION, THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION MAY DIRECT THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TO WITHHOLD UP TO TEN PER CENT OF THE MONTHLY APPORTIONMENT OF STATE AID THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE DUE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL. THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL ADJUST THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL'S APPORTIONMENT ACCORDINGLY. WHEN THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OR THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DETERMINES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION A, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL RESTORE THE FULL AMOUNT OF STATE AID PAYMENTS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL.
C. THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL PAY FOR ALL EXPENSES OF A HEARING CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
D. ACTIONS TAKEN UNDER THIS SECTION ARE SUBJECT TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO TITLE 41, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 10.
E. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT OR PROHIBIT:
1. COURSES OR CLASSES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN PUPILS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW.
2. THE GROUPING OF PUPILS ACCORDING TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING CAPABILITY IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, THAT MAY RESULT IN A DISPARATE IMPACT BY ETHNICITY.
3. COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE THE HISTORY OF ANY ETHNIC GROUP AND THAT ARE OPEN TO ALL STUDENTS, UNLESS THE COURSE OR CLASS VIOLATES SUBSECTION A.
4. COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE THE DISCUSSION OF CONTROVERSIAL ASPECTS OF HISTORY.
F. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT OR PROHIBIT THE INSTRUCTION OF THE HOLOCAUST, ANY OTHER INSTANCE OF GENOCIDE, OR THE HISTORICAL OPPRESSION OF A PARTICULAR GROUP OF PEOPLE BASED ON ETHNICITY, RACE, OR CLASS.
Notice the restrictions E and F at the end. While some are quick to ridicule the bill, there were two examples in the nation recently that this bill would seem to address. That black only field trip certainly would have run right into this law and that UCLA professor who was advocating the downfall of capitalism via revolution. So it isn’t like the thing this bill addresses don’t or can’t happen.
Chris, the slave trade talking points is bullshit. Go back to your circle jerk of rightwing friends and snicker about that amongst yourselfs. Stop being intellectually dishonest. The bill is not about the slave trade.
ReplyDeleteThe idea behind the bill wasn't greater enforcement of anti-smuggling laws, but the deportation of the workforce illegals, all which could have been done by strengthening the laws for businesses caught using them.
But that doesn't happen because that places the blame on white business people, not the poor mexicans that are the rightwingers enemy.
Chris, your slave trade comment is right on target. The Hypocrats are crapping in their pants because their human smuggling ring is taking a hit. No more illegals to exploit. Look at the tizzy the liberals get themselves in when a state enforces a federal law!!!! ROFLMAO
ReplyDeleteInteresting that Politico piece. Look at the Hypocrats, still pushing their "separate but equal" bullshit. Classes for the Hispanics, classes for the blacks, classes for the whites. I love watching them push their segregationist principles while calling everyone else racists! BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteJoe you are off with your comment about it being racism. Are you saying that paying someone well below min. wage isn't slave trade? What do you call the trafficing of humans into this country to work for pennies on the $? Read the law Joe and stop lieing.
ReplyDeleteJohn makes a great point here.
ReplyDeleteAnon, this bill isn't about human smuggling. Its not about migrants being paid less than minimum wage. Stop being dishonest.
ReplyDeleteThis bill did little to stop either of those things. If you studied history and the lobbying battles over immigration you'd know that many prominent pro-republican groups like the Chamber of Commerce have opposed increasing sanctions on business that hire illegals. You'd also know that Maricopa sheriff has raided plenty of business and arrested hundreds of illegals but failed in most cases to cite the business.
The bill isn't about human smuggling. But the status que is about smuggling. Get it? Got it? Good! Joe right now illegals are being used as slaves in this country. They are being paid less because they are illegal. If this bill is about racism then it is also about you on the left supporting the inslavement of Mexicans. Why do the Democrats stand against inforcing the human smuggling immigration laws? Why did you lie and say it is about racism when it is in the law that it is not? Are you that big of a liar? Why do the unions want to keep the human smuggling going on in this country? Why are the unions trying to unionize and organize the illegal immigrantes? If you are against this law then you are a racist and pro-human smuggling period.
ReplyDeleteYou Would Think Union Workers Who Protest Out Sourcing Over Seas Would Be Appauled at Illegal Immigrants Taking Jobs In this Country At Lower Pay. This Is Ineffect Out Sourcing Jobs Here! That Slave Thingy Is Progressive Talking Point That As Usual Is Crap But Got To Give Some Credit For That Drinking Of The Kool Aide The More They Drink The Dumber They Get!
ReplyDeletePoliticans Will Not Enforce Or Support Immigration Laws For ONE Reason "Potential VOTES" Period. When In OUR Nations History Did Breaking ANY Law Become OK. We Have Methods Of Changing Laws ,Ignoring Them Is Not And Should Not Be That Method. If This Became The Norm What Other Laws Can People Ignore Cause They Dont Like It.
The Melting Pot Is Broke and With Out Serious Enforcement Of Immigration Laws What Do We Do With The Immigrants Legally Attempting To Enter Our Nation.
The Millions Of Illegals Are Here To Stay Because Of Government Lax Of Enforcement.
Before ANY Amnesty Shut Down The Borders. Put Legal Applicants For Citizenship At The Front Of The Line And Illegals With ID Cards Obtained Through Immigration At The Back Of The Line! There Should Be NO Reward For Breaking A LAW!
Progressives You Got The Power Change The Damn Law But Those Weak Politicans With Re Election In Mind Aint That Stupid!~