Friday, July 23, 2010
Glenn Beck Comments On Obama's Financial Takeover (Reform) Bill
Can any liberal out there answer Glenn Becks Questions? I can't believe what I've read about it so far. Just remember which party gave you these bills. Tell you kids who gave us this kind of governance. Tell them so they never go down this path again. God help us get through this.
Wash. Times Op-ed: The Case for Impeachment
Eleven years ago, like every citizen elected to serve in Congress or any person appointed to any federal position, I swore an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic."
I've always thought it significant that the Founders included domestic enemies in that oath of office. They thought liberty was as much at risk from threats within our borders as from outside, and French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville agreed with that warning.
In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the greatest threat to our nation was clear - and foreign. While Islamic terrorism still represents the greatest external threat to America and American lives, the avowed program of the Obama regime has changed the picture in a fundamental way.
For the first time in American history, we have a man in the White House who consciously and brazenly disregards his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution. That's why I say the greatest threat to our Constitution, our safety and our liberties, is internal. Our president is an enemy of our Constitution, and, as such, he is a danger to our safety, our security and our personal freedoms.
Barack Obama is one of the most powerful presidents this nation has seen in generations. He is powerful because he is supported by large majorities in Congress, but, more importantly, because he does not feel constrained by the rule of law. Whether he is putting up the weakest possible defense of the Defense of Marriage Act despite the Justice Department's legal obligation to support existing law; disenfranchising Chrysler and GM bondholders in order to transfer billions of investor dollars to his supporters in the United Auto Workers; or implementing yet a third offshore oil-drilling moratorium even after two federal courts have thrown out two previous moratoriums, President Obama is determined to see things done his way regardless of obstacles. To Mr. Obama, the rule of law is a mere inconvenience to be ignored, overcome or "transcended" through international agreements or "norms."
Mr. Obama's paramount goal, as he so memorably put it during his campaign in 2008, is to "fundamentally transform America." He has not proposed improving America - he is intent on changing its most essential character. The words he has chosen todescribe his goals are neither the words nor the motivation of just any liberal Democratic politician. This is the utopian, or rather dystopian, reverie of a dedicated Marxist - a dedicated Marxist who lives in the White House.
Because of the power he wields over budgets, the judiciary, national defense and even health care, his regime and his program are not just about changing public policy in the conventional sense. When one considers the combination of his stop-at-nothing attitude, his contempt for limited government, his appointment of judges who want tocreate law rather than interpret it - all of these make this president today's single greatest threat to the great experiment in freedom that is our republic.
ALSO:
Jeffrey Kuhner: President's Socialist Takeover Must Be Stopped
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.
He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.
I've always thought it significant that the Founders included domestic enemies in that oath of office. They thought liberty was as much at risk from threats within our borders as from outside, and French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville agreed with that warning.
In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the greatest threat to our nation was clear - and foreign. While Islamic terrorism still represents the greatest external threat to America and American lives, the avowed program of the Obama regime has changed the picture in a fundamental way.
For the first time in American history, we have a man in the White House who consciously and brazenly disregards his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution. That's why I say the greatest threat to our Constitution, our safety and our liberties, is internal. Our president is an enemy of our Constitution, and, as such, he is a danger to our safety, our security and our personal freedoms.
Mr. Obama's paramount goal, as he so memorably put it during his campaign in 2008, is to "fundamentally transform America." He has not proposed improving America - he is intent on changing its most essential character. The words he has chosen to
Because of the power he wields over budgets, the judiciary, national defense and even health care, his regime and his program are not just about changing public policy in the conventional sense. When one considers the combination of his stop-at-nothing attitude, his contempt for limited government, his appointment of judges who want to
ALSO:
Jeffrey Kuhner: President's Socialist Takeover Must Be Stopped
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.
He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.
Nullification: Interview with a Zombie
Unconstitutional law should not be inforced. The liberal zombie interviewer sounds just like the progressives on this blog.
Obama Admin Under Investigation For Racial Bias In Closing Car Dealers
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
More at link:
www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/race_played_role_in_obama_car.html I've been hearing about this for some time now as I know many of the car dealers in my area that got closed down and the ones that stayed. It sure does look like that "social justice" is just reverse discrimination with a different name. Does it seem like we are "post racial" now? What gives the government the right to pick and choose winners? What gives them the right to pick those winners based on race or sex? Is this "social justice"? Do you really believe that equal justice is wrong and we need the federal government to make things "right"? These dealers worked their butts off to build a business and the government steps in and closes them down. They paid a lot of money to start and keep their dealerships and now they have nothing but debt and large properties that no one wants. This is wrong no matter what party you belong to. And to discriminate based on sex and color is wrong no matter who it is against.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
More at link:
www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/race_played_role_in_obama_car.html I've been hearing about this for some time now as I know many of the car dealers in my area that got closed down and the ones that stayed. It sure does look like that "social justice" is just reverse discrimination with a different name. Does it seem like we are "post racial" now? What gives the government the right to pick and choose winners? What gives them the right to pick those winners based on race or sex? Is this "social justice"? Do you really believe that equal justice is wrong and we need the federal government to make things "right"? These dealers worked their butts off to build a business and the government steps in and closes them down. They paid a lot of money to start and keep their dealerships and now they have nothing but debt and large properties that no one wants. This is wrong no matter what party you belong to. And to discriminate based on sex and color is wrong no matter who it is against.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Internet Video: ACORN Storms Chase Bank Branch?
Just look at these animals. We will see a lot more of this kind of insurrection from the left wing activist. Who among you think that what these animals are doing is right? This is a business not a public arena. All I hear is "We want" from the left. If you ever see anything like this call the cops and then Fox news. Because the cops might not do anything but Fox News will. I'm just waiting for more riots when Obama and the Democrats inflame the left wing with more blame to business and the "wealthy". What gives the left the right to be prejudice towards the "rich". Do we not all have equal right in this country? This social justice is just another form of bigotry from the left. The "rich" give you jobs stupids. When will you understand? And this new financial control bill will make it impossible to give those idiots loans thanks the the Democratic party ands Obama. Those banks now get punished or sticking their neck out and giving mutts like that loans. Who do you think that will effect most? The slumlords are going to love this. I wonder why they aren't at Freddy and Fanny protesting? Or Chris Dodd's house and Rangle's. The Democratic party put the same people and entities in charge over the same financial system that the helped collapse. If it wasn't for the government making the banks give questionable loans we wouldn't be in this mess. And if you think that this bill fixes anything then ask yourself why isn't Freddy and Fanny written into the bill? If you can't see that this financial control bill is bad for this country and those idiots protesting then you are high or an idiot. And if these lieing POS tell us something about the bill ask where it is in the bill. Because this Congress and President have lied too us way too many time for us to even try and believe them. The will bang the Democratic parties drum without a reasonable thought to what they are doing. But they have so much hate in their heart for us that they can't even see it. Riots Erupt in Oakland
OAKLAND, Calif. Violent protests erupted in Oakland with stores damaged and dozens arrested after a Los Angeles jury convicted a white former transit officer of involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man.
Prosecutors had wanted Johannes Mehserle convicted of murdering Oscar Grant . So Thursday's lesser verdict raised concerns of a repeat of the rioting that followed the shooting on New Year's Day in 2009 on an Oakland train platform. The trial was moved to Los Angeles following the riots.
Police in riot gear Thursday had maintained a watchful eye over a crowd of protesters as emotions ran high with about 500 people marching in the street. Members of a crowd near City Hall moaned and cursed when they heard the verdict.
Sporadic violence later broke out and police said they made 83 arrests throughout the night for violations that included failure to disperse, vandalism and assaulting a police officer.
At least a dozen businesses were damaged, including a looted Foot Locker store and a ransacked jewelry store, police said. Protesters also smashed the windows of a bank, set fires in several trash bins, and detonated a small incendiary device near a police station that caused no damage.
"This city is not the wild, wild west," said Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts. "This city will not tolerate this sort of activity."
Though police did not release a damage estimate, the protesting appeared to be much less severe than the rioting that hit Oakland after Grant was shot.
Even though the protests wound down late Thursday, Batts expected the number of arrests to double overnight.
During the trial, prosecutors said the 28-year-old Mehserle became angry at the 22-year-old Grant for resisting arrest. He was shot in the back while he lay face-down. Mehserle claims he mistakenly drew his gun instead of his Taser.
The writing is on the wall. If you aren't preparded for more of this kind of actions then you are taking a big risk. Prepare for the worse and pray for the best. And we have seen what kind of cold hearted bastards these liberals can be.
Rangel Charged with Ethics Violations
WASHINGTON — A House investigative committee on Thursday charged New York Rep. Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations, a blow to the former Ways and Means chairman and an election-year headache for Democrats.
The committee did not immediately specify the charges against the Democrat, who has served in the House for some 40 years and is fourth in House seniority. The announcement by a four-member panel of the House ethics committee sends the case to a House trial, where a separate eight-member panel of Republicans and Democrats will decide whether the violations can be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
The timing of the announcement ensures that it will stretch into the fall campaign, and Republicans are certain to make it an issue as they try to capture majority control of the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi had once promised to “drain the swamp” of ethical misdeeds by lawmakers in arguing that Democrats should be in charge.
Rangel led the tax-writing Ways and Means panel until he stepped aside last March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case — finding that he should have known corporate money was paying for his trips to two Caribbean conferences.
Officials said that in the current case, the committee and Rangel’s attorney tried unsuccessfully to negotiate asettlement . The sources spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private discussions. A settlement would have required Rangel to agree that he violated ethics rules. It's time they fire this man. And go ahead you liberal POS call me a "Racist". If a Republican would have done this then he or she would have been thrown out on their butts. He is as crooked as they come and the Democratic Party is frigging crooked. I'm sure no one thinks he should stay. In fact it's time to throw all of them out. The whole Congress needs to go. Congress only have an 11% approval rating so stop voting in the incumbent. This Congress has done nothing but screw up our country and they need to be taught a lesson. Fire them all in Nov and again in 2012.
The committee did not immediately specify the charges against the Democrat, who has served in the House for some 40 years and is fourth in House seniority. The announcement by a four-member panel of the House ethics committee sends the case to a House trial, where a separate eight-member panel of Republicans and Democrats will decide whether the violations can be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
The timing of the announcement ensures that it will stretch into the fall campaign, and Republicans are certain to make it an issue as they try to capture majority control of the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi had once promised to “drain the swamp” of ethical misdeeds by lawmakers in arguing that Democrats should be in charge.
Rangel led the tax-writing Ways and Means panel until he stepped aside last March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case — finding that he should have known corporate money was paying for his trips to two Caribbean conferences.
Officials said that in the current case, the committee and Rangel’s attorney tried unsuccessfully to negotiate a
UNEMPLOYMENT STILL RISING
How do you explain the fact the unemployment keeps rising? The conservatives and Republican party the stimulus bill wouldn't work. Where is the proof that it did work? The new Democratic party have made things much worse then ever and they were forewarned buy conservatives. But Obama said that unemployment wouldn't go past 8% with the passing of the stimulus bill. When will you on the left admit to the fact the stimulus bill was nothing more then a big business and big labor payoff? when will you admin that it didn't work at all? Unless working mean growing government. And the stupid sheeple keep on believing everything the main stream media and the Democratic party tell them. There is proof that the main stream media has worked to withhold stories and to start stories that aren't true. But they keep on pushing their progressive ideology. The Democratic Party haven't done one thing to make our economy better. They have only used the economy to gain power for themselves and their friends and voters. They are pushing for more unemployment while putting more and more Americans out of work. We don't want unemployment or handouts. We want jobs. And as long as the Democratic party keeps on this path we will keep getting more and more people unemployed. I'd just like to know what kind of spin the Democrats will give on this new unemployment numbers. The true unemployment numbers are so high now that we are entering a depression not leaving one. And wasn't it just last week that Obama and the Democratic Party said we are coming out of this recession? How can any party be so wrong so often and still have idiots backing them up?
Congress and Obama Pass Financial Reform Bill To "Stop Government Bailouts"
So yesterday Obama signed the 2,000 page financial reform bill to "stop the government bailouts of Wall Street" according to Obama. Are you flipping serious? Does Obama and his uber rich left wing think that Americans are that stupid? We didn't need a 2,000 pg bill to stop the government bailouts the Democrats love to hand out to their big business and big labor. They just need to stop giving handouts to those big companies they love to hate. I can't wait to see what is in this monstrous bill. Just look at all the things Obama and the Democrats lied about in the health care bill. I haven't yet read the bill but I'm judging them on their past lies. Lies which the left haven't yet apologized for on this blog. No they rather point their fingers at something else other then ask for forgiveness for their lies of omission and commission. But the left see nothing wrong with their lies. They are too busy talking about "Faux News" when it has been the main stream media caught in faking news stories and hiding stories of Rev.J Wright. This is the game of the left. When they do something racist call the right racist. When they have been caught in repeated lies just call us liars. It's what I call the I Know You Are But What Am I tactic. But this is all a cover-up. We need to take a close look at this bill because when the left point in one direction we need to see what the real story is in their other hand. What is in this financial reform bill that they don't want us to see? And how will it effect our 401K's in the future? The Democrats talk about the little guy but help only the big business,big labor and big government. They talk about Pay-Go but refuse to use it. They talk about cutting the budget but they only have grown it. If you trust the Democratic Party maybe you need to put more money in the stock market. If you don't then you need to pull back and change your 401K arround to better represent your beliefs. I feel that this will harm business in America and help overseas companies . I have changed over my 401K to represent where I think the profits will go. We are spreading the wealth and my money is on those companies that will have an unfair advantage over the American companies. Look at where George Soros put his money. He put it in foreign oil companies(Petrobras)and foreign banks. If you find out anything or have an opinion of this new 2,000 pg bill please let us know. We need to be vigilant with this anti-business admin. We need to let everyone know what they are doing to our financial future and we need to show how it will effect us. The left will point us away from this story because the Democratic party.moveon.org and the uber rich say too. But we need to know how this admin and the Democratic machine does things and counter it with the truth.
We conservatives work together to put a light on the lies of the left. We need to pay attention to what they are doing and not what they are saying.
We conservatives work together to put a light on the lies of the left. We need to pay attention to what they are doing and not what they are saying.
Oh Crap I Didn't Think Of That Till I Heard Dick Morris On O'Rielly
It's a fact that Shirley Sherrod was fired before this story was run at 8pm. And yet the main stream media is tell their viewers a different story,also known as a lie. Why aren't the left wing on this blog pointing out this little old FACT? Why aren't they talking about the lies they are still perpetuating on the main stream media smear campaign? I'm also wondering where the left are and the NAACP with their sorry for calling us Tea Partiers racist without one drop of proof? Why is it OK for the left wing and the NAACP to call us racist without proof? Why can they take things out of context and outright lie about the Fox coverage of the story without remorse? Is their a double standard for those with a conscience and moral fortitude over those without values like the left? I've learn the left wing hold us to a standard they refuse to hold to their own. They call the Tea Party racist when the NAACP has racist,UAW,SEIU and any other group you can think of has racist within it. They want us to do what they are unwilling to do. And that is root out the racist when they are their. And that is why they can't produce a video of what they have accused us of. The left are lieing in order to get their way. They always have done this as they are as unscrupulous as they get. Even good old JoeC took the satirical writings of Mr.Williams blog out of context to prove the Tea Party is racist right in the same post that he blamed us for doing that. Williams writings were tasteless but not racist and JoeC knew it. But guess what we still pushed him out of the Tea Party Express because of his racial insensitivity. The left take thing out of context all the time and never ever say sorry for their actions. They bring up God,with a capital letter G, when they are trying to shame us. The left wing media and blogger talk about the racism and violence from the Tea Party and town hall meeting when it has been the unions SEIU and the left that have done ALL the violence since their accusations. There are videos up the kazoo of violence and hate speech as well as racism of the left. But they write that off and keep pointing the finger at us. I've been called a racist and a liar at every turn by these left wing radicals. It's time we hold these liberals to the same standard as we hold ourselves and as they hold us. The media and the left are lieing about the Fox coverage so that their beloved buffoon in chef doesn't have to take the blame. Sorry folk but once again the Obama admin screwed up big time. Today is the 1 year anniversary of the "Cambridge police acting stupidly" incident. Obama jumps to conclusions of race as fast as anyone I've ever seen. He needs to seek help for that since he has as much white in him as black. He has said things like his grandmother was a typical white person when it came to racism. That offended me that he thinks he can bundle us white people like that. But the left and right largely ignored his racial insensitivity. Should we hold our president to the same standard as the NAACP holds the Tea Party? Because if we do then all the left wing would out on their butts right now. And we mustn't forget the fact that Mrs.Sherrod was talking about her far left ideologue to the NAACP. That is still forbidden for a government employee that represents the state of Georgia USDA. But I'm sure the left wing media wont notice that point of her speech. And I wonder why none of those great questions asked by the media of Gibbs never got answered or played on the main stream media news?Could it be that it didn't fit the news casters ideology?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)