Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Sorry Shirley Sherrod

I would like to say I did misjudge Shirley Sherrod by that edited video. I also like to say that if Andrew Brietbart did the editing of this video then I will never ever listen to that man again. It seems the left wing want me and Fox News to apologize for what we did. They have place the blame of this women loosing her job more on Fox News then anyone. The problem with that is they,whoever they is,fired her before it made it to the news. Fox news said they tried to get her perspective but she refused. Now I do have a big problem with the Obama admin and her boss playing games with giving this poor women they fired her job back. Gibbs wouldn't commit to what the Obama admins decision is. The had no problem forcing her to pull over and quit "now". But they are lallygagging on giving her her job back. That is bull. I also thought about the fact that these are the people that have their hands on our country and our bombs. If they can't make a easy decision about something as small as this then I'm scared. This is the second time the Obama admin has acted "stupidly" without thinking first. And what about the NAACP? They had the full 43 min tape and they still came out against this women. There are people out there that deserve the blame. I'd like to know who edited the video,who fired Shirley Sherrod and who at the Obama admin demanded her resignation. These are pertinent facts that are left out thus far. Now the left need to learn a lesson from this. They are all over everyone without all the facts. So shame on them as well. But the brunt of the shame falls on the editor of the video,Andrew Brietbart, the USDA person that made her resign, whoever in the Obama admin that demanded she get fired and the NAACP for not reviewing the tape that was in their possession when they called her a racist. But I am also sorry for my part in all this.

Where Is The Proof NAACP

The NAACP has made a major push to discredit the Tea Party and it's members by using the race card. Maybe we need to take a close look at the NAACP and see what kind of speeches they have that might be racial. I'm sure if a reward was given for such video we would see some wild videos. Since Andrew Brietbart offered $100,000 to anyone with a video of these Tea Partiers doing what the black caucus accuses them of doing. There were police that said they didn't hear it even though they were right on top of the black caucus. There are thousands of video and none show anything like they are accusing the Tea Partiers of. So why the double standard? All we ask for is to give us proof of these accusations and we will take care of it. But since they have no proof then I will just say it. They are the ones that are causing racial tensions with their LIES. The NAACP needs to get their act together and stop trying to play racial politics for the Democratic Party. And if they want to talk about "un-American" they better look in the mirror. It's high time we expect the same from them as they expect from us.

Take Action: Personal Attacks & Ugly Slurs Have No Place In Politics

Last Saturday, while Representatives filed through a House office building on their way to watch President Obama deliver a Health Care speech, some extremist protesters turned vicious. Civil rights legend and Georgia Congressman John Lewis was called the N-word by the crowd, while fellow Congressional Black Caucus member Emanuel Cleaver was spat on. Some in the crowd yelled at longtime NAACP champion Representative Barney Frank using an anti-gay epithet.
  This behavior is not only outrageous—it is un-American. Click here to sign the petition and help us send the message that degrading slurs and personal attacks have no place in our political discourse. 

This Is Just One Of The Posts That Lies To Inflame Racial Tensions

This is the kind of posts the NAACP has on their web site. Just take a close look at the title of the story.

NAACP Files Legal Challenge to Arizona Racial Profiling Law

Nation’s largest civil rights organization will not host any events in the state; Calls for direct action against the law and will urge MLB to move 2011 All Star Game

The NAACP in coalition with other civil rights groups filed a class action lawsuit today challenging Arizona’s new law requiring police to demand "papers" from people they stop who they suspect are not authorized to be in the U.S. If an individual is caught without papers they can be arrested and jailed. The extreme law, the coalition charged, invites the racial profiling of people of color, violates the First Amendment and interferes with federal law.
[Read more]

They know by now that the Arizona law only enforces the federal law already on the books. The NAACP also knows the language of the law makes it ILLEGAL for the police to "racially profile". So why is the NAACP trying to not give the whole picture on this Arizona law? This seem like nothing less then the NAACP giving false information in order to inflame racial tensions among their members. It does serve them to make a racial issue out of almost everything they can. And they are damn good at it. I was looking for an article about the fact that obamacare covers the cost of abortions with tax payer money. Since 80% of Planed Parenthood is in black and minority areas I'd thing that would be of interest to the NAACP. But killing black babies with tax payer money isn't a top priority since the Democrats alone put it into the bill they alone past. I say black babies because that is the majority of abortions and who the NAACP focuses on. The second biggest race killed by abortions is Hispanics. I think it would behove conservatives of all races to look at the NAACP web page and what the really stand for. It looks like the Democratic party has control over that web site and the NAACP. People in glass houses should throw stones and that means you liberals and your organizations. The NAACP better clean up it's own organization before they try and mark the Tea Party as racist without any tangible proof. What do you think about the NAACP title of this article on their web site?

Liberal Journalists Suggest Gov't Shut Down Fox News


Journalism is dead thanks to liberals. Just look at what they have been doing. We were called conspiracy nuts when we said this was happening. But now we know the mainsteam media is in it with the altra-liberals Obama admin. We have seen that they have used the race care to stop us conservatives. We have seen the mainstream media lie about abortions being covered under obamacare and the effectiveness of the stimulus. The mainstream media didn't cover the communist Van Jones story or the criminal organization of ACORN. But they have no problem blaming Fox News for "destroying Shirley Sherrods life". Even Shirley blames the Obama admin for it.

Documents Show Media Plotting to Kill Stories on Rev. Wright


It was the moment of greatest peril for then-Sen. Barack Obama’s political career. In the heat of the presidential campaign, videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright. Now the black nationalist preacher’s rhetoric was threatening to torpedo Obama’s campaign.
 The crisis reached a howling pitch in mid-April, 2008, at an ABC News debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. Gibson asked Obama why it had taken him so long – nearly a year since Wright’s remarks became public – to dissociate himself from them. Stephanopoulos asked, “Do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as you do?”
 Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists. The tough questioning from the ABC anchors left many of them outraged. “George [Stephanopoulos],” fumed Richard Kim of the Nation, is “being a disgusting little rat snake.”
 Others went further. According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
 In one instance, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
 Michael Tomasky, a writer for the Guardian, also tried to rally his fellow members of Journolist: “Listen folks–in my opinion, we all have to do what we can to kill ABC and this idiocy in whatever venues we have. This isn’t about defending Obama. This is about how the [mainstream media] kills any chance of discourse that actually serves the people.”
 “Richard Kim got this right above: ‘a horrible glimpse of general election press strategy.’ He’s dead on,” Tomasky continued. “We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this. This is just a disease.”

Beck: Shirley Sherrod 'Shouldn't Have Been Fired'

The Full Video Of Shirley Sherrod USDA

This is the full video of Shirley Sherrod NAACP speech. I have to say the context does make a difference and it makes me wonder why the Obama admin and the USDA made this women quit without the full context.  I want you to also listen to Andrew Breitbarts reasoning behind how he got the edited video. Now there are many on the left like blame Brietbart and Fox news but they didn't fire her or edit the video.  They covered the news that they had.