Liberals Love Glenn Beck

Glenn Beck: What Happens When Gov't Tries to 'Fix' Things?

Watch Glenn Beck weekdays at 5p & 2a ET on Fox News Channel

I wanted to show this Glenn Beck show because everyone on the left seemed to enjoy him so much. Let's see if you on the left can discredit what he says or disprove it.

Liar!!! Abortion Is In The 1,990 pg Healthcare Bill

A national pro-life group is warning members of Congress that a vote in favor of the 1,990-page House healthcare bill is a vote to establish a federal government program that would directly fund abortion-on-demand with taxpayer dollars.


Page 110 of H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, authorizes a new government health insurance program to pay for all elective abortions.  Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, explains.

"This is a federal agency, a federal program, [and] of course it's going to spend federal funds -- that's the only kind of funds it's got," he notes. "So all of these assurances that some prominent Democrats, including President Obama, have given that there won't be federal funding for abortions, that's not what's in the bill."

Johnson warns that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) wants to ram the bill through without representatives having a chance to vote on a single amendment.  However, in order to use that "closed rule" procedure, a majority of House members have to agree to the move.  The pro-life spokesman is urging members to vote "no" on a closed rule.

"We want to vote on an amendment that would take abortion out of this bill, which is the [Bart] Stupak amendment," Johnson clarifies, referring to the Michigan Democrat.  "We believe if we could get a vote in the full House on that amendment, it would pass."

Congressman Stupak has vowed that if he does not get a vote on his amendment barring federal funding of abortion, he and 40 pro-life Democrats will block a full House vote on the healthcare bill.

Why do Democratic leaders continue to insist abortion funding

isn't in their healthcare reform bills?

The Left Wing Thinks AIDS/HIV Is Racist

President Obama just said that nearly half of all new HIV cases are of African-Americans. It is obvious to many on the left that this is a racist disease. I hope they find a cure for liberalism soon. It is a killer.

Obama + Google= Net Neutrality Scheme XOXOXO

 Google – and its puppets like Free Press – are promoting this idea that it’s a struggle between big telecommunications firms, and the little guys. Except the little guys are actually bigger Internet firms. The corporations pressing for Net Neutrality are Fortune 500 and even Dow Jones Industrial Average firms, with billions in cash ready to be spent on Net Neutrality, trying to defeat Proposition 8, or even promoting Barack Obama.
That last one makes the FCC’s rush to regulate look bad, given all the placements of Google people within the Obama administration as well as the nearly one million dollars that Google employees gave to the Obama-Biden campaign. How do we know that the secretive Obama White House isn’t directing the FCC to pay off Google?
After all, we know he’s giving donors special treatment. In fact, it has come out that FCC Chairman Genachowski himself was a major fundraiser for Obama, pulling in over a half million for the campaign. Why shouldn’t we believe that this is all a big circle of back scratching in the Obama adminstration, when he refuses to release the kinds of information we need to determine otherwise?
The President has played political games with information all along. He dangles his birth certificate on a string in order to distract the right. He’s keeping as little of the Obamacare agenda in writing as possible, because he knows if we read it and expose his plans, we can win the fight, so we end up with ridiculous spectacles like a Senate committee voting on a bill that hasn’t been written yet. And now he’s playing footsie with donors in secret.
We must encourage and join Senator McCain and Representative Blackburn in their fresh legislative efforts to stop the Google/Obama Net Neutrality scheme. We cannot allow this kind of quid pro quo to go unchallenged.

Occam's Razor For Politics and Science

Occam's Razor

one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

Occam's razor is a logical principle attributed to the mediaeval philosopher William of Occam (or Ockham). The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. This principle is often called the principle of parsimony. It underlies all scientific modelling and theory building. It admonishes us to choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models of a given phenomenon the simplest one. In any given model, Occam's razor helps us to "shave off" those concepts, variables or constructs that are not really needed to explain the phenomenon. By doing that, developing the model will become much easier, and there is less chance of introducing inconsistencies, ambiguities and redundancies.
Though the principle may seem rather trivial, it is essential for model building because of what is known as the "underdetermination of theories by data". For a given set of observations or data, there is always an infinite number of possible models explaining those same data. This is because a model normally represents an infinite number of possible cases, of which the observed cases are only a finite subset. The non-observed cases are inferred by postulating general rules covering both actual and potential observations.
For example, through two data points in a diagram you can always draw a straight line, and induce that all further observations will lie on that line. However, you could also draw an infinite variety of the most complicated curves passing through those same two points, and these curves would fit the empirical data just as well. Only Occam's razor would in this case guide you in choosing the "straight" (i.e. linear) relation as best candidate model. A similar reasoning can be made for n data points lying in any kind of distribution.
Occam's razor is especially important for universal models such as the ones developed in General Systems Theory, mathematics or philosophy, because there the subject domain is of an unlimited complexity. If one starts with too complicated foundations for a theory that potentially encompasses the universe, the chances of getting any manageable model are very slim indeed. Moreover, the principle is sometimes the only remaining guideline when entering domains of such a high level of abstraction that no concrete tests or observations can decide between rival models. In mathematical modelling of systems, the principle can be made more concrete in the form of the principle of uncertainty maximization: from your data, induce that model which minimizes the number of additional assumptions.
This principle is part of epistemology, and can be motivated by the requirement of maximal simplicity of cognitive models. However, its significance might be extended to metaphysics if it is interpreted as saying that simpler models are more likely to be correct than complex ones, in other words, that "nature" prefers simplicity.

Is H1N1 Just A Power Grab?

Officials declared a heightened state of alert for Macomb County,Mi. This action streamlines the process for closing schools, shutting businesses, evacuating neighborhoods, temporarily reassigning county personnel and protecting volunteer staff from liability — should the need arise. Does this seem like a lot of power to give to one group or one person? This is what they can do in my town. What can they do in yours? Does this scare you more then the virus itself?

Sexism In The Democratic Party

I just Googles "sexism in the Democratic party". I couldn't believe how much there is on that subject. I knew about all the racism in the Democratic Party but there is a lot of sexism I never knew was happening. See what you can find on these new Democrats.

More BS From The Democrats And Bawney Fwank

This pisses me off. The Democrats are giving our money to their friend. Talk about gov't. waist. We need jobs not political BS.

Watch Glenn Beck weekdays at 5p & 2a ET on Fox News Channel

Say It Ain't So Joe

Biddens approval rating is at 45%.  8 yrs. ago Cheney was at 65%. How can you explain this other then Biden is the biggest buffoon ever to serve as VP? The left thought Cheney was bad and yet America thinks Biden is worse. Not a very good start if they want to get reelected in  3yrs. Ande if you think the Democrats are acting poorly now just wait. Once the media turns on them they will be flailing like a 2 yr old in a store when he doesn't get what he wants.