Friday, November 27, 2009

Buffoon Fest At The Pre 9/11 White House

November 25, 2009  

Video: Reporter 'surprised' to see couple

Video: Charges for dinner crashers?


  1. This just goes to show how pre 9/11 this admin is. This is a big mistake on the part of secret service. Did you see the dumb look on Bidens face when he was close to that women for a picture? It's like a comedy show with the Democrats in office. It would be called, Buffoon Fest in the White House. Or they could call it Crisis in the White House. Either way the world is laughing at our govt and the terrorist are given new Hope with this new admin. Thank God they were friendly and only had a camera. I know the left think it isn't a big deal but they keep saying that the right wing is dangerous and yet not one thing has happened other then a riot from the left wing,a left wing suicide that was blamed on the right wing, houses were burned in the name of the environment etc...

  2. Dont think al-qaida hasnt been taking notes regarding this incident at the one at Fort Hood


  4. Doug, EXACTLY ! Under this baffoon hussein just think of all the lapses in security ! Oops,but it's all Bush's fault,,,,right,,,,

    p.s.; Chris, Biden always looks that way - dumb as a doornail.

  5. Could you be more stupid, Chris? I don't think so. The Secret Service did make a mistake, but to try to make it partisan, is beyond the pale, just like most of your posts.

    If anything, the Secret Service needs more agents and more funding to keep the President safe from the 400% increase in threats to his life, some no doubt from the Psalm 109:9 crowd.

  6. Bruce, the Funding cannot be DONE until we get Another LOAN from China,More to Follow!
    Nice to see you could bring Religion into Blog,has Nothing to do with TOPIC but thats OK,Apparently neither do YOU!

    note: I understand their some ACORN people looking for Employment pending their LAW suit!

  7. Once again Bruce has made a complete ass of himself. You would think if Obama did indeed have a 400% increase in death threats (a lie which I disproved earlier) then the SS would have managed to step up security for a State dinner, aka an event in the Obama's house. Stupid Bruce, that is your answer to everything, increase funding. God, why did you make Bruce so stupid? Was it to make everyone else look smart?



  9. Wow this guy is dumber than yeast, More funding my butt, What are they doing with holding security to get a raise?
    I swear libs destroy the best of everything in this country and the only answer they ever have is we need to spend more money to make it better because it cant be their policies that are failing.
    I cant point to a better example of that than what they have done with education and our once fine cities across the nation

  10. Bruce did I say it was the Democrats fault? So how could it be partisan? Talk about being stupid Bruce. I was having fun with the stupidity of this admin. And this is a stupid thing to happen. The way your mind works you most like think it was the Republicans that set him up.I like the way you blame Christians for everything. How stupid is that? Go back to licking windows with vomamike and djpork.

  11. Bruce maybe they had too pull agents away from the party to give to Michelle to do her hair nails and makeup? Did Michelle use he aids for the one thing she did? Plant a garden.

  12. So Bruce why did this happen only with the Obama admin and no other admin? And is anything ever going to be blamed on this admin? Doug is right you are a yeast infection.

  13. Does anyone remember how the left reacted to Bush thowing up at an event? He puked and they went nuts over it. Talk about stupid.

  14. If retail sales are going up and cars start selling along with other products will Obama take credit for it? You bet he will. If it is good Obama and the Democrats take credit but when it's bad they play dodgeball with it never taking responsibility. Since the Democrats never take responsibility for anything that goes wrong how can they fix anything? They don't and the can't. Just look at how they never address the unemployment. The stimulus bill didn't help unemployment for the most part. Isn't unemployment/economy and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Or is it the SHOW they are putting on for health care and the GITMO/NY trials? Obama has all the time on earth for SEIU and other social/community organizers. The Democrats just don't care. If they cared they would do something and give it the time it diserves in their eyes. What are they doing instead of trying to fix unemployment? By the way the jacked up the H1N1 flu vac. distribution. That didn't even work the way Obama planed. At this point in Obamas term you'd be better off betting against Obama then for him. He's wrong 90% of the time. Those are bad odds. Thank goodness he's only running our country for us.

  15. Do you remember before Obama took office it was "Hope","Change" and "Yes We Can". And now that he is office it's "It's not our fault", "We didn't do it" and "It's all Bush's fault". At least Bush took his lumps with honor and dignity. He took the blame for the Iraqi war going bad and did the surge to make a change so we could win that war. Bush turned things around when they didn't go well. The Democrats are so retarded they think it's the Republicans fault they can't get the health care bill straight for a yes vote by the Democrats.

  16. Chilling details are emerging in the local Colorado press about violent black gangs who have been targeting white victims for months:

    The Denver Police Department announced today that they have made 32 arrests during a sweep to end a four-month spree of what police said were racially motivated assaults and robberies in downtown Denver, including the LoDo entertainment district.

    A task force comprised of the Denver Police, FBI and the Denver District Attorney’s Office investigated 26 incidents in which groups of black males verbally harassed and then assaulted white or Hispanic males, according to Denver Police Chief Gerry Whitman.

    Many of the victims were robbed after being assaulted.
    Although police knew what was going on, citizens were left in the dark.

    More dangerously blind diversity-mongeringat work? Fear of litigation or accusations of profiling by the usual mau-mauers?

    You decide:

    Denver Police Chief Gerry Whitman said that groups of young black males from the Rollin’ 60s Crips and the Black Gangster Disciples gangs approached single white or Latino men late at night and struck them in the head, often after berating them and calling attention to their race, but sometimes attacking without warning.

    Victims in the LoDo and 16th Street Mall attacks suffered broken noses and shattered eye sockets, among other head injuries. Sometimes wallets and other small items were stolen.

    “We have seen coordinated efforts before, but not by this large of a group,” Whitman said as the arrests were announced Friday.

    Yet no concerted effort was made to alert residents to the unusual nature of these violent crimes, or their apparent racial motivation.

    Police say there may have been 26 such attacks, almost all against white males, but investigators stress there could be other victims and more are coming forward. A few are women.

    Monday, police spokesman Sonny Jackson told us all but one of the 35 suspects are now in jail, each on a $1 million bond due to the racial bias involved. The mostly young men and teenage boys are charged with aggravated assault, aggravated robbery and bias-motivated crimes.

    The situation was so grave even the FBI got involved.

    Who knew? Certainly not the young white and Latino men who were at risk of being attacked.

    Though Denver Police issued a warning on Sept. 3 that they were aware of “a pattern of assaults and robberies,” they simply said “single males” should be on the lookout.

    Jackson said that at the time, police weren’t yet aware of the full scope and biased nature of the attacks. Once the warning went out and police heightened their presence, he said, the attacks “dried up.”

    Therefore, Jackson told us, it was unnecessary to issue a more explicit warning, even as investigators learned the more menacing aspects of the crimes.

    Jackson said keeping the warning broad should have been enough. “We didn’t want anyone to take their guard down,” Jackson said.

    But if police know that a particular segment of the population is being targeted, don’t they have a responsibility to give potential victims a specific warning?
    Looks like yet another case of “If you see something, say something — unless it’s politically incorrect.”

    Oh, and you know if the races were reversed that p.c. panderer AG Eric Holder would be flying to Denver right now (with race demagogue Al Sharpton in tow) to hold a press conference and vow to ensure the safety of the Mile High City’s residents.

  17. Bruce it kind of looks like that racist card was so far off. In fact the media had no problem calling conservatives racist without much proof and when they have proof of black on white racism they say nothing. Obama supporters aren't too happy and some of them blame us because they were told too by the liberal media pushing for a race riot or conservative riot. But instead they got the G-20 Liberal Taliban riots,Black Panthers at the polls intimidating without one arrest,Psycho libs defacing things to make it look like conservatives did it and more black on white and black on black crimes instead. They call it wrong almost every time. So why would anyone listen to any idealogue that is wrong most of the time?

  18. Imposters at the White House? I think that began in January.

  19. Watch how the White House handles it Craven. I bet they put them on the list or something so as not to embarace the White House. They will find their names on the list or something. Wouldn't that be funny if they try and pull that one off?

  20. Ahhh, typical partisan shit. So security f-ed up. Like this is Obama's fault? Whatever.

    Bruce, no sense in even trying to cover for them. let it go.

  21. JoeC, I agree, all these people do is find a twisted way to try to blame everything on Democrats and President Obama, no matter how screwed up their "logic" is.

  22. There was a screw up made,Secret Service will pay the Price,and it will be found out that the Secret Service People were HIRED during the BUSH years and then all will be WELL in Neverland,it WILL be called LOGIC!

    How come when Conservatives point out LIB errors its called TWISTED but when LIBS argue against Conservatives its said to be LOGIC!

  23. It sucks when we play the same partisan BS you on the left did and do for over 8 years. Just look at Bruces blog and tell me they aren't getting some of their own medicine. You on the left are so thin skinned and you make our country weak.

  24. AL I think you will end up being the most right. Good call on the logic of the left.

  25. Chris, i'm just laughing it off. Perhaps you didn't play back during Bush's years but the standard game back then went like this....

    Liberal: Look the WH press sec gave a daypass to white house briefings to a male hooker (Jeff Gannon)and he tosses softballs to ole George

    consevrative: so what!?! Clinton got a blowjob.

    So its not like the cons didn't play back. Don't think ya just sat there and took it. In fact the cons spent most of those years blaming Clinton. You might not have but plenty did.

  26. Shut up you idiots. Everybody loves Obama.

  27. Bruce, i wasn't agreeing with ya completely. You were off with the funding thing. Stupid shit happens. Sure its partisan to make anything out of that, but so what? let them have their fun.

  28. Al, here's where you're wrong. The Secret Service isn't partisan. Their job is to protect the President, Republican or Democrat.

    Yes, they screwed up, but to blame it on liberals is utterly ridiculous.

  29. Yeh us cons took more then you libs. I'm pointing out what cry babies those on the left are now that it's their turn on the wipping pole. It doesn't help your cause when Obama and the Democrats keep making more mistakes then good. JoeC and vomamike are two of the more even handed libs. There are few libs that will let cons say what they want. There are few libs with blogs anymore as it is getting harder for them to defend the stupidity of the Democrats in office.

  30. Bruce it's just one more stupid thing that went wrong and the left had nothing to do with it. That is the joke here. Why did Bush get blamed for what happened at Gitmo? Remember the pictures? Bush and the Republicans got blamed for what a few soldiers did at a prison.hypocrits

  31. their are still alot of liberal blogs, but alot of them are bitching at Obama for not closing Gitmo, not ending Afghanistan and such.

  32. Chris, you are an even bigger idiot than I thought.

    First, the Secret Service is a non-partisan organization and its duty is to protect the President, Democrat or Republican.

    As far as Bush and Gitmo, Bush sought legal justification to torture prisoners there and it has now come out we did torture prisoners there and ad Bagram.

    The Republicans, Bush, Cheney and John Yoo and the other White House lawyers are directly responsible for what happened at Gitmo and Bagram and all other U.S. prisons, and extraordinary renditions and setting up secret prisons around the world to torture people.

    You are comparing apples and oranges, Chris.

  33. I don't see much bitching about Obama from the left wing bloggers.I see a little bit but not much negative on Obama. Joe do you think the far left will protest again in the numbers they used to with Bush? I don't see any true outrage over the Pariot act,Afghan and Iraq war and not closing GITMO coming from the left. If Obama sends only 30,000 troops will you and the left be protesting that action with us on the right? We both want to end the war. You on the left want us to hightail it out of there ASAP and we want to win the war and get out ASAP. If we can't win the war we want what you want.

  34. Our soldiers are non-partisan also stupid. I'm not talking about the inocent waterboarding to get info that saved American lives,which you on the left could care less about. I'm talking about Abu Gahrab photos. Remember those sick soldiers taking pictures of the prisoners in their underwear possing and what not?

  35. Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan said in a statement the agency "is deeply concerned and embarrassed by the circumstances surrounding the State Dinner on Tuesday, November 24." The Secret Service took the entire blame for the breach and did not point any fingers at the White House Social Office.
    "The preliminary findings of our internal investigation have determined established protocols were not followed at an initial checkpoint, verifying that two individuals were on the guest list," Sullivan said in the statement.
    "Although these individuals went through magnetometers and other levels of screening, they should have been prohibited from entering the event entirely. That failing is ours.
    "The Secret Service safely processed more than 1.2 million visitors last year to the White House complex. In the last several years, the agency has successfully protected more than 10,000 sites for the President, Vice President and other Secret Service protectees, screening more than
    7 million people through magnetometers at campaign related events, with more than 1 million during the Inauguration alone.
    "Even with these successes, we need to be right 100% of the time. While we have protocols in place to address these situations, we must ensure that they are followed each and every time.
    "As our investigation continues, appropriate measures have been taken to ensure this is not repeated.
    "The men and women of the U.S. Secret Service are committed to providing the highest level of security for those we are charged to protect, and we will do whatever is necessary to accomplish this mission."
    White House Spokesman Nick Shapiro said in a statement, "The men and women of the Secret Service put their lives on the line everyday to protect us, they are heroes and they have the full confidence of the President of United States. The White House asked the United States Secret Service to do a full review and they are doing that. The United States Secret Service said they made a mistake and they are taking action to identify exactly what happened and they will take the appropriate measures pending the results of their investigation."
    See the Secret Service took the blame for the White House Social Office just like they were told to.

  36. Bruce Once again you missed the POINT! Never said it was Neither Partys FAULT just said Logic is Different in REAL World and Neverland!

  37. The left hate it when we conservative mirror the them. It's like what many of the world leaders say about Obama being too green to govern a country. Did you know that only 10% of Obamas cabinet has ever had or run a business. No wonder why they hate the business' that give 80% of Americans their jobs. Obama is dumb when it comes to governing a country. He thinks he's still running for most popular man in the world.

  38. Huge props to Joey for calling Bruce out on the stupid funding thing. Bruce is the king of throwing whatever shit he can come up with against the wall and seeing what will stick. That was hilarious when Bruce thought Joey was agreeing with him. Bruce keep up the comedy you turd.

  39. She's hot. That is how they got in. Democrats think with their d@cks not their heads. Just look at JFK,Clinton and Carter for instance. Clinton used a young girl as an ashtray for Gods sake.

  40. As I said, Chris, liberal dissatisfaction with President Obama is growing for sure. I don't think there is just a little murmur of dissatisfaction, there is a growing crescendo.

    There is no such thing as "innocent waterboarding" Chris. Waterboarding is torture and torture is a illegal and a war crime and Bush, Cheney and everyone responsible for our torture policy should be tried as such.

    As far as the incident at the White House, the Secret Service took the blame because that's where the blame lies, not because the White House told them to. You think President Obama has way more power than he really does, Chris.

    Yes, you will see people in the streets protesting sending any more troops to Afghanistan. Heck, we are almost out of troops and many of our soldiers have spent 2, 3, 4 and 5 tours. That is beyond the capabilities of most of our military psychologically and physically, not to mention what it does to their families.
    Divorces and suicide is through the roof in the military because of the multiple deployments and 20% of our soldiers are suffering from PTSD and are not getting the care they need and all of America will suffer for that.

    We cannot win in Afghanistan or Iraq. No empire has every won a war in Afghanistan and Russia used 500,000 troops and still had to leave Afghanistan. How in the world could we possibly think we can win with 80 or 100,000 soldiers. Afghanistan has a corrupt government and no feelings of nationalism or loyalty to their central government, therefore, they will never be able to stand up a national army, no matter how much training we do.

    It does seem to me that if threats against the President are up 400%, we need more agents which does cost more money. Just seems logical. We're talking millions of dollars, not billions and we should protect our President at all costs.

    You might want to read this entry at about blog traffic and the citing of liberal blogs in the corporate media.

  41. I do beleive that the War on Terror as turned into Political Football and when this Occurrs its TIME to GET out. We have other ways of Protecting Citizens and Interest with out putting Military in HARMS way in a POLITICAL ARENA!

    I also think its time to Bring Troops home from Germany,South Korea and Japan! Troops at Southern boarder would certainly boost Security their and hopeful bring Illeagal Entry under Control.No matter the Troops are Safer here than in Middle East where ALL Descisions are now and have been BASED on POLITICS! Thats what went Terribly Wrong in NAM and if we aint careful POLITICS will do it AGAIN!

    We now have Technology that can keep TERRORISTS heads down and Occupied with their SURVIVAL but if Waterboarding is BAD what the heck Happens if we ACTUALLY kill them and cannot bring them to New York City for a Circus Trial,OOPs Politics again!

  42. Bruce just because you say illegal doesn't mean it is. Why haven't you seen anything happen with that wild theory of yours. You are a "Truther".

  43. 400% bwaaahahahahahahahaha. That is funny. And you also said the Tea Party protester are the dangerous ones while the liberals riot at G-12. You are so full of crap


Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.