Sarah Palin made an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor last night to test her mettle on one of the biggest issues in the political sphere today: illegal immigrants. Bill O’Reilly grilled her on specifics to finding a solution to the problem and, in her responses, Palin made it very clear that immigration may be the one substantive issue around which she has a tight grip.Palin was adamant that illegal immigrants should not be “rewarded the bad behavior” and continued along in this vein until O’Reilly stopped her, in a very similar manner to how he stopped Univisión anchor Jorge Ramos in a debate earlier this week, and asked for concrete reactions to the problem. Palin responded that she would like all illegal immigrants to register and that, in an ideal situation, “you deport them. you have to get them out of here.” I think Palins reform is spot on. We need to take care of our own in this country before we take care of others. The Democrats are trying to make this out about race but this is about Americans and taking care of their needs first. Any party that puts illegals above citizens of this country needs to be thrown out on their asses. And since the Democrats side with the illegals every time then they are not for Americans and must go the way of the Wig Party. The Democratic Party is here to serve us and our needs not those of other nations. But the Democratic Party has made a name for itself by dictating who gets what in this country. If you are American then why would you vote for a party that doesn't put your needs first? Why would you vote for a party that makes everything about race? And why would you vote for a party that hurts the working class by taking their money and giving it to non-Americans? My grandparents came from Germany and Hungry legaly as well as most Americans. We are a country of equal justice. That is up until the Democratic Party took over both branches of government. Now we are a country of "social justice" which is a term that means the party in power gets to pick and choose who get's what justice. If you are of a darker color skin melanin then the Democrats want to use you to gain power. The color of your skin means power to the Democratic party and they are using it. We have the first black president in this country and the Democrats are calling everyone a racist that isn't with them on every issue. They have made a joke of racism in this country. This is about protecting what is ours and not letting thieves come in illegally and taking what is ours. The Democratic Party is not for reform or the American people. They are all about using race as a tool to divide this country. If you are part of the 62% of Americans that are for the Arizona law and wish Washington would try and fix the border issues then you need to rethink the party you vote for. The Democratic party is not for the security of our borders and that is one more reason that the Democratic Party needs to become obsolete in this country.
Thanks for posting these videos. I haven't seen them yet and will take some time later today. Obama needs the illegals for votes, plain and simple. He's lost the independents and some Democrats who have "seen the light". The hispanic vote is up for sale and by fighting the AZ immigration bill and making speeches about "comprehensive immigration" (amnesty), he is hoping to add them to the Democrat voter roles and get their vote. Sarah Palin is a great conservative and a definite asset to our country's quest to maintain our freedom & liberty.
Regime Has One Goal Changing OUR Nation To European Type Socialism Period. Wheather Its Takes Illegals Voting, Bankrupting The Nation, Taking The Free Market/Private Sector And Killing It This Regimes Goal Is Simple Power/Control Over Citizens.
Why Else Does This Regime NOT Care What Citizens Want Or Care About. This Regime Is A Nation Buster Period!
Governors of 35 states have already filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon them. It only takes 38 States to convene a Constitutional Convention.
Really important! Hope you all do it!
This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on.
An idea whose time has come:
For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they didn't pay into Social Security, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. The latest is to exempt themselves from the Health care Reform that is being considered...in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don't care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come.
Have each person contact a minimum of Twenty people on their Address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.
Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ."
WELLLLLLLLLLL. DAMN! :) The comment section doesn't have wrap text, so I shorten it. Thought you'd might like this. Cox has filed a brief on behalf of AZ http://tinyurl.com/25ydtvh
Please Bruce, enlighten us with your liberal interpretation of why the AZ law is unconstitutional. This is a stall tactic by Obama to get comprehensive immigration reform passed so he can grant amnesty to all illegals, even though a majority of Americans don't want amnesty and favor the AZ law. Just shows, once again, Obama is out of touch with Americans
I am in favor of the Constitution and as an American we have the right to protect ourselves even if the Fed doesn't protect up. Would you rather have malitia protecting the citizens of this country? Why aren't you against the sancuary cities Bruce for the same reason? It's all about dismantaling America and that is why the left/Democrats are going after the Arizon law that protects it's citizens rather then the sanctuary cities that protect illegals over it's citizens. It's just one more proof of the lefts hate of America and it's citizens.
Thank God Mike Cox is doing this in Michigan. We have a lot of illegal White immigrants in this state. Many of which are forming criominal organizations that make the Italian mafia look like kids.
I didn't say that it was, Joe. However interpretation of the constitution does differ between liberals and conservatives.
Now based on the dates (May) of those articles, I am pretty sure they have changed their interpretation of the AZ law… after reading it. Brent Hume, last night on the Factor even admitted, he too, mis-interpreted the AZ law… until he actually read it.
Both articles got it wrong and they have obviously not read the statute, at that time. Case in point:
With regards to 1070 “But freedoms of many innocent people will be intruded upon” If you have done something unlawful you ARE required to provide ID, regardless of ethnicity. If you have violated the law, everyone and anyone is required, by law, when as officer request from you, to show identification. IF you have done nothing, an officer has NO right to walk up to you and ask for ID.
“the sovereignty of the individual over the collective:” The Federal statute does this, not the AZ law. BOTH links, the authors point to incarceration of Japanese Americans because of what they looked like, which was wrong. 1070 does NO such thing and makes it a violation for an officer to question and detain based on what they look like, as the Federal law gives AND authorizes that type of reasonable suspicion.
“S. B. 1070 doesn’t codify abuse, but it does codify the power for government abuse” That’s saying the same thing, the guys talking point comes out one end and at the same time it is coming out the other end, but then gives a Texas example, which doesn’t mandate of what a “person looks like”, but what the “vehicle” and occupants “mannerisms” look like. Poor example, Joe, but I doubt you and the authors understand the law in AZ.
Our Border Security Is Suppose To Be Function Of The Federal Government. Politics/Politicans Have Made A Bad Situation Dangerous For Decades And It Must Be Stopped Now.
Wonder Along With The Millions Of Illegals Coming Through Our Open Borders How Many Terrorist Have Made It Also? Wonder What Types Of Weapons Have Also Been Brought Through Our Open Borders?
If Illegals And Drug Smugllers Can Come Through At Will Why Not Terrorist And Their Weapons!
This Is A Security Issue To Citizens But To Regime Its Political Ideaology Including Voters. To But That Before Safety Of Citizens Should Be A Crime And Saddly When All Is Said And Done It Might Be.
Bruce Thought The States Have Rights Also And If Feds Are Derelict In Their Duty To Protect Citizens What Choice Does State Have? Wait For Regime To Do What? They Have Had Months And As Usual They Have Done Nothing But Dither Away Why Arizona Suffers. This Regime Knows EXACTLY What Its Doing And It Has Nothing To Do With Border Security.
Mark, here you go. Legislation pertaining to naturalization is a federal authority. I'll use this article from the Wall Street Journal to explain it to you.
Bruce Illegals Entering OUR Nation Is Illegal And NO Matter Who Says What Thats The Truth!
Our Security As A Nation Is At Stake And Federal Government Is Not Slow To Act, It Refuses To Act And I Beleive Thats Unconstituional. The Regime Took Oath When Taking Over And One Was To Protect OUR Citizens Which As Far As I Know STILL Includes Arizona Citizens.
Still Believe Terrorist Can And Are Crossing That Border At Their Leisure And Bringing Weapons With Them. Why Not Bruce They See A OPEN Door Policy By This Regime!
We have the right to protect ourselves if Washington wont. And it is obvious Wahington wont. That is the part of the Constitution you on the left keep forgetting. This is just a political game the Democr4ats are playing and as proof why aren't they going after the sancuary cities for the same reason Bruce and Joe??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Why would the Democrats put Americans at risk like this????????????????????????????? Are the votes really worth the lives of Americans???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Chris Go Tend Your Garden Cause The Plants Will Grow Before Your Eyes Before You Get A True Non Talking Point Answer From The Left.
Heres Some More Question:
To Go To Canada Or Mexico I Need Pass Port. Wonder Why?
What Is Mexico Doing To Prevent OUR Illegal Immigrant Crisis At The Border?
Does Mexico Protect Their Southern Border Differently Than The Northern Border If So Why?
Why Does Not OUR Country Take Mexicos Lead And Adapt Mexicos Immigration Laws?
Mexicos President Said Illegal Arms Are Coming Through Our Borders Into Mexico. Can Terrorist And There Weapons Use The Same Route Coming INTO Our Nation?
Bruce "Legislation pertaining to naturalization is a federal authority." Naturalization, yes. Regulation, yes. Enforcement, however, IS required by both feds and states, as states must enforce federal statutes. And since the Feds have failed to enforce the law AND article 4 Section 4 of the US Constitution which states "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion" AS they are required to do, the state has the right to enforce the Federal statute. There is nothing in the constitution that says states cannot enact and enforce their own laws, the federal law just take precedence, under the supremacy clause.
Thanks, Chris and Al. I am just getting tired of some twisting the simple and logical interpretation of the Constitution in to something that it's not.
Thanks for posting these videos. I haven't seen them yet and will take some time later today. Obama needs the illegals for votes, plain and simple. He's lost the independents and some Democrats who have "seen the light". The hispanic vote is up for sale and by fighting the AZ immigration bill and making speeches about "comprehensive immigration" (amnesty), he is hoping to add them to the Democrat voter roles and get their vote.
ReplyDeleteSarah Palin is a great conservative and a definite asset to our country's quest to maintain our freedom & liberty.
Regime Has One Goal Changing OUR Nation To European Type Socialism Period. Wheather Its Takes Illegals Voting, Bankrupting The Nation, Taking The Free Market/Private Sector And Killing It This Regimes Goal Is Simple Power/Control Over Citizens.
ReplyDeleteWhy Else Does This Regime NOT Care What Citizens Want Or Care About. This Regime Is A Nation Buster Period!
Governors of 35 states have already filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon them. It only takes 38 States to convene a Constitutional Convention.
ReplyDeleteReally important! Hope you all do it!
This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on.
An idea whose time has come:
For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they didn't pay into Social Security, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. The latest is to exempt themselves from the Health care Reform that is being considered...in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don't care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come.
Have each person contact a minimum of Twenty people on their Address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.
Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States ."
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2010/07/michigan_ag_mike_coxs_brief_to.html
ReplyDeleteTry that again
WELLLLLLLLLLL. DAMN! :)
ReplyDeleteThe comment section doesn't have wrap text, so I shorten it.
Thought you'd might like this.
Cox has filed a brief on behalf of AZ
http://tinyurl.com/25ydtvh
The Arizona and any copycat laws are un-Constitutional, period. Cox is wasting taxpayer money again.
ReplyDeleteI thought you were in favor of the Constitution. I guess I was wrong about that.
You are traitors to the United States of America.
You pick and choose what parts of the Constitution you want to be in favor of, how convenient.
Please Bruce, enlighten us with your liberal interpretation of why the AZ law is unconstitutional.
ReplyDeleteThis is a stall tactic by Obama to get comprehensive immigration reform passed so he can grant amnesty to all illegals, even though a majority of Americans don't want amnesty and favor the AZ law.
Just shows, once again, Obama is out of touch with Americans
I am in favor of the Constitution and as an American we have the right to protect ourselves even if the Fed doesn't protect up. Would you rather have malitia protecting the citizens of this country? Why aren't you against the sancuary cities Bruce for the same reason? It's all about dismantaling America and that is why the left/Democrats are going after the Arizon law that protects it's citizens rather then the sanctuary cities that protect illegals over it's citizens. It's just one more proof of the lefts hate of America and it's citizens.
ReplyDeleteThank God Mike Cox is doing this in Michigan. We have a lot of illegal White immigrants in this state. Many of which are forming criominal organizations that make the Italian mafia look like kids.
ReplyDeleteMark, its not a liberal or conservative matter.
ReplyDeleteCheck out these interpretations of the law...
http://biggovernment.com/dtrowbridge/2010/05/13/criticisms-of-arizonas-immigration-law-comply-with-conservative-principles/
http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2010/may/28/mack-why-conservatives-should-oppose-arizonas-immi/
but i doubt you'd understand the principles they speak of.
I didn't say that it was, Joe. However interpretation of the constitution does differ between liberals and conservatives.
ReplyDeleteNow based on the dates (May) of those articles, I am pretty sure they have changed their interpretation of the AZ law… after reading it.
Brent Hume, last night on the Factor even admitted, he too, mis-interpreted the AZ law… until he actually read it.
Both articles got it wrong and they have obviously not read the statute, at that time. Case in point:
With regards to 1070
“But freedoms of many innocent people will be intruded upon”
If you have done something unlawful you ARE required to provide ID, regardless of ethnicity.
If you have violated the law, everyone and anyone is required, by law, when as officer request from you, to show identification.
IF you have done nothing, an officer has NO right to walk up to you and ask for ID.
“the sovereignty of the individual over the collective:”
The Federal statute does this, not the AZ law.
BOTH links, the authors point to incarceration of Japanese Americans because of what they looked like, which was wrong.
1070 does NO such thing and makes it a violation for an officer to question and detain based on what they look like, as the Federal law gives AND authorizes that type of reasonable suspicion.
“S. B. 1070 doesn’t codify abuse, but it does codify the power for government abuse”
That’s saying the same thing, the guys talking point comes out one end and at the same time it is coming out the other end, but then gives a Texas example, which doesn’t mandate of what a “person looks like”, but what the “vehicle” and occupants “mannerisms” look like.
Poor example, Joe, but I doubt you and the authors understand the law in AZ.
Our Border Security Is Suppose To Be Function Of The Federal Government. Politics/Politicans Have Made A Bad Situation Dangerous For Decades And It Must Be Stopped Now.
ReplyDeleteWonder Along With The Millions Of Illegals Coming Through Our Open Borders How Many Terrorist Have Made It Also? Wonder What Types Of Weapons Have Also Been Brought Through Our Open Borders?
If Illegals And Drug Smugllers Can Come Through At Will Why Not Terrorist And Their Weapons!
This Is A Security Issue To Citizens But To Regime Its Political Ideaology Including Voters. To But That Before Safety Of Citizens Should Be A Crime And Saddly When All Is Said And Done It Might Be.
Bruce Thought The States Have Rights Also And If Feds Are Derelict In Their Duty To Protect Citizens What Choice Does State Have? Wait For Regime To Do What? They Have Had Months And As Usual They Have Done Nothing But Dither Away Why Arizona Suffers. This Regime Knows EXACTLY What Its Doing And It Has Nothing To Do With Border Security.
Mark, here you go. Legislation pertaining to naturalization is a federal authority. I'll use this article from the Wall Street Journal to explain it to you.
ReplyDeletehttp://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/04/23/law-profs-on-arizona-immigration-bill-its-unconstitutional/
Here are a few more conservatives stating the Arizona law is unconstitutional.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20003549-503544.html
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/05/01/arizona-immigration-law-unconstitutional/
http://freakoutnation.com/2010/04/27/karl-rove-arizona-law-may-be-unconstitutional/
There's more, but maybe even you folks will get the point. Even highly regarded conservatives get this one.
Bruce Illegals Entering OUR Nation Is Illegal And NO Matter Who Says What Thats The Truth!
ReplyDeleteOur Security As A Nation Is At Stake And Federal Government Is Not Slow To Act, It Refuses To Act And I Beleive Thats Unconstituional. The Regime Took Oath When Taking Over And One Was To Protect OUR Citizens Which As Far As I Know STILL Includes Arizona Citizens.
Still Believe Terrorist Can And Are Crossing That Border At Their Leisure And Bringing Weapons With Them. Why Not Bruce They See A OPEN Door Policy By This Regime!
We have the right to protect ourselves if Washington wont. And it is obvious Wahington wont. That is the part of the Constitution you on the left keep forgetting. This is just a political game the Democr4ats are playing and as proof why aren't they going after the sancuary cities for the same reason Bruce and Joe??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Why would the Democrats put Americans at risk like this????????????????????????????? Are the votes really worth the lives of Americans???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
ReplyDeleteChris Go Tend Your Garden Cause The Plants Will Grow Before Your Eyes Before You Get A True Non Talking Point Answer From The Left.
ReplyDeleteHeres Some More Question:
To Go To Canada Or Mexico I Need Pass Port. Wonder Why?
What Is Mexico Doing To Prevent OUR Illegal Immigrant Crisis At The Border?
Does Mexico Protect Their Southern Border Differently Than The Northern Border If So Why?
Why Does Not OUR Country Take Mexicos Lead And Adapt Mexicos Immigration Laws?
Mexicos President Said Illegal Arms Are Coming Through Our Borders Into Mexico. Can Terrorist And There Weapons Use The Same Route Coming INTO Our Nation?
Bruce "Legislation pertaining to naturalization is a federal authority."
ReplyDeleteNaturalization, yes. Regulation, yes. Enforcement, however, IS required by both feds and states, as states must enforce federal statutes. And since the Feds have failed to enforce the law AND article 4 Section 4 of the US Constitution which states "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion" AS they are required to do, the state has the right to enforce the Federal statute. There is nothing in the constitution that says states cannot enact and enforce their own laws, the federal law just take precedence, under the supremacy clause.
Dang mark you are one smart blogger. Thanks for clearing up Bruces missinformation.
ReplyDeleteGreat Post Mark! Bruce Do You Have ReBUTal My Guess Nope?
ReplyDeleteThanks, Chris and Al. I am just getting tired of some twisting the simple and logical interpretation of the Constitution in to something that it's not.
ReplyDelete