Can anyone name an admin. that has had more radicals in it? I'm sure the lefties will say the Bush admin. If you think the Bush admin had more radicals in it then name them and tell use why they are radical.
This isn't a blog its a xerox point for the daily talking points. but considering your net neutrality screed at least the talking points aren't written by someone clearly struggling.
Joe when are you going to cut and paste your comments again? I see you can't name one admin. that has had more radicals in it then the Obama admin. Instead you chose to make fun of me and the blog you read every day. Joe when you have an original thought let us know. We'd love to read it. You are nothing more then a cookie cutter liberal unionist. You puke out every union talking point and in the same breath make fun of me for giving the conservative perspective a forum. If their is any struggling it's you. Just look at how lame you comments have been since you realize that your idealogy is idiotic and not working as planned. I can tell by your comments that I should feel sorry for you. And I do. I hope everything is alright with you and yours.
JoeC said... here's the best explanation of a banana republic i've found...
The purpose of a banana republic is commercial profit by collusion between the State and favoured monopolies, whereby the profits derived from private exploitation of public lands is private property, and the debts incurred are public responsibility. Such an imbalanced economy reduces the national currency to devalued paper-money, hence the country is ineligible for international development credit and remains limited by the uneven economic development of town and country.
Kinda reminds me off the Bush years with its much more open door policy to public land use for private profit.
21 December, 2010 10:44 And here you are using someone elses work. Why don't you stop projecting and start coming up with your own thoughts?
European Socialist countrys going Bankrupt and appear to be trying to get back there Economy by using Capitolism. You know that Private sector thingy.
We seem to be going the other way to European Socialism even though we can see the Failure of it all over the World. Im just trying to figure out WHY Our politicans and their actions would stay on a coarse that has Failed over and over again through History and not blink at BANKRUTCY and it possibility at this time.
Citizens know whats happening and spoke in Mid Terms. 112th Congress had better gets its act together and protect OUR economy,Free market and Private sector through tuff legislation regarding Trade and Fairness to OUR workers and businesses.
With Strong Economy all OUR Entitlement and Welfare programs go POOF!
Liberal programs make for Citizens dependancy on Government and We must make more citizens dependant on themselves. Paying for all can never be accomplished and im afraid we are proving that NOW!
More of someone else's finest work.
ReplyDeleteThis isn't a blog its a xerox point for the daily talking points. but considering your net neutrality screed at least the talking points aren't written by someone clearly struggling.
Joe when are you going to cut and paste your comments again? I see you can't name one admin. that has had more radicals in it then the Obama admin. Instead you chose to make fun of me and the blog you read every day. Joe when you have an original thought let us know. We'd love to read it. You are nothing more then a cookie cutter liberal unionist. You puke out every union talking point and in the same breath make fun of me for giving the conservative perspective a forum. If their is any struggling it's you. Just look at how lame you comments have been since you realize that your idealogy is idiotic and not working as planned. I can tell by your comments that I should feel sorry for you. And I do. I hope everything is alright with you and yours.
ReplyDeleteJoeC said...
ReplyDeletehere's the best explanation of a banana republic i've found...
The purpose of a banana republic is commercial profit by collusion between the State and favoured monopolies, whereby the profits derived from private exploitation of public lands is private property, and the debts incurred are public responsibility. Such an imbalanced economy reduces the national currency to devalued paper-money, hence the country is ineligible for international development credit and remains limited by the uneven economic development of town and country.
Kinda reminds me off the Bush years with its much more open door policy to public land use for private profit.
21 December, 2010 10:44
And here you are using someone elses work. Why don't you stop projecting and start coming up with your own thoughts?
European Socialist countrys going Bankrupt and appear to be trying to get back there Economy by using Capitolism. You know that Private sector thingy.
ReplyDeleteWe seem to be going the other way to European Socialism even though we can see the Failure of it all over the World. Im just trying to figure out WHY Our politicans and their actions would stay on a coarse that has Failed over and over again through History and not blink at BANKRUTCY and it possibility at this time.
Citizens know whats happening and spoke in Mid Terms. 112th Congress had better gets its act together and protect OUR economy,Free market and Private sector through tuff legislation regarding Trade and Fairness to OUR workers and businesses.
With Strong Economy all OUR Entitlement and Welfare programs go POOF!
Liberal programs make for Citizens dependancy on Government and We must make more citizens dependant on themselves. Paying for all can never be accomplished and im afraid we are proving that NOW!
It is as if they are trying to destroy this country so they can spread the wealth and have social justice.
ReplyDelete