North Korea Thinks We Have Become Weak

A U.S. Navy helicopter flies over the Nimitz-class USS George Washington for joint... (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man). North Korea has already given a declaration of war to our friend South Korea with little more then a funny look from President Obama. Could this all be part of the Obama plan? Could this be the Democratic Parties plan to create jobs and lower the unemployment? Nothing like a world war to get everyone working again. Nothing like a common enemy to rally Americans to him. Now I don't believe any of this but many left wing blogger believe these things. But they think it's the Republican party pulling strings behind the scenes. Thing sure aren't getting better around the world that's for sure. But to blame the Republicans,Dick Cheney and Haliberton is just stuck on stupid funny. Our friends and enemies not only don't respect us they don't fear us anymore either. Now if North Korea blows up one of our or South Korea ships what will we do? Will we just sit there all stupid debating NK intentions? Will we sanction them with teeth this time? Will we blame Bush and look to the UN for guidance? Or will we beat the living shit out of that country until they can't stand up against us again? And if we blow them deeper into the third world this time we better not rebuild them. War could become these countries recovery strategy since they know we rebuild countries we go to war with. Now one comment I seen from a lefty blogger is that a war with NK and China would help slow down China's economy and population growth. Are we really just like locusts to the left? Would "Mother Earth",a pagan god, really be better off if millions of people in China die and stop using energy? We have all seen what the left is capable of doing so be prepared for anything. These are crazy times. It wouldn't take much to send the world into WW III. Pray for peace and our enemies.

Rangle Can't Believe MSNBC Would Ask A Real Question

RUSSERT: But you are not worried about losing your job?

RANGEL: What are you talking about? Are you just trying to make copy? What job? The one I got?

RUSSERT: Yeah, these are potentially very serious violations.

RANGEL: How do you think I got my job? I was elected. How do you think I lose it?

RUSSERT: Well, there's two ways, you can lose it if your colleagues voted you out of here because of ethics violations or if your constituents don't support you.

RANGEL: What station are you from?

RUSSERT: NBC, MSNBC.

RANGEL: Well, you're young. I guess you do need to make a name for yourself, but basically you know it's a dumb question and I'm not going to answer it.

RUSSERT: How is it a dumb question?

RANGEL: It's allegations made by some people.

RUSSERT: Sir, sir, you did not file taxes on your properties in the Dominican Republic allegedly. If that comes to be true, is that not a problem?

RANGEL: It doesn't really sound like NBC asking these dumb questions.
Even Rangle knows MSNBC is a faux news station. He can't believe that a faux news station like MSNBC has finally ask a real question of a Democrat/liberal. Heck I can't believe it either. I wonder what would happen if all the news stations asked real questions of the Democrats instead of just being arm of the DNC? If the Democratic party loses the help of the MSM they are finished. Just look at the dumb look on Rangles face when he is asked those questions by a friend of the DNC. Priceless :-)

WATCH: Explosive Anti-Ground Zero Mosque Ad

 

Here is an explosive new video that lobbies Americans to not allow the building of a huge mosque across from Ground Zero. It details Islam’s history of building mosques at sites around the world it considers emblematic of Jihadist victory over enemies. The video suggests the desire to build a mosque across from Ground Zero would follow in that tradition. Opposition to the building of a mosque there continues to grow, and the issue promises to become an explosive one in upcoming campaigns.

Keith Olbermann Is "Misogynistic",Predictable" and "Pompous" Pappion(Buterfly)

The Daily Caller’s latest JournoList findings reveal that Keith Olbermann’s far left buddies find him to be “misogynistic”, “predictable” and “pompous”.
The Daily Caller: If you were one of the 400 members of the listserv Journolist, perhaps one of the most vicious insults you could hurl at a colleague is: You’re just like Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity.
If the reader holds neutral — or even positive — views about the Fox News hosts, the insult may not sting. But in the cloistered world of liberal listserv enclaves, Hannityism is a cardinal sin. After all, Fox is a “dangerous,” “deranged” “cesspool” that, possibly, the FCC should be investigating.
The feelings against MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, then, must run deep.
“He’s become O’Reilly on the left– completely predictable, unfunny, and arrogant,” said Georgetown University Professor Michael Kazin in May 2009. “To my mind, what they do is no different form Hannity and O’Reilly,” said the New America Foundation’s Michael Cohen, “At least Hannity and O’Reilly engage with the other side (if mainly just to yell at them). Olbermann is just an echo chamber.” [...]
The Nation’s Katha Pollitt began the group’s rant. “He and Michael Musto did this whole long riff about beauty contestant Carrie ‘opposite marriage’ Prejean’s breast implants, stupidity, breast implants, tacky clothes, earrings, breast implants. They went on and on about how she was ‘part plastic’ and pathetic. You’d think they were celibate vegans who spent their lives zen meditating. It was just a whole TV humiliation of her, and it made me feel sorry for her, which wasn’t easy,” Pollitt said.

Video: This Cannot Be Real…

I think I finally found a Republican the left would vote for. Maybe he's the lefts next messiah when Obama's gone. I'd love to see this debate on national TV or Pay-Per-View. Who said progressives and Republicans don't mix?  Cheers

ShareThis

Glenn Beck Comments On Obama's Financial Takeover (Reform) Bill

Can any liberal out there answer Glenn Becks Questions? I can't believe what I've read about it so far. Just remember which party gave you these bills. Tell you kids who gave us this kind of governance. Tell them so they never go down this path again. God help us get through this.

Wash. Times Op-ed: The Case for Impeachment

Eleven years ago, like every citizen elected to serve in Congress or any person appointed to any federal position, I swore an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic."

I've always thought it significant that the Founders included domestic enemies in that oath of office. They thought liberty was as much at risk from threats within our borders as from outside, and French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville agreed with that warning.

In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the greatest threat to our nation was clear - and foreign. While Islamic terrorism still represents the greatest external threat to America and American lives, the avowed program of the Obama regime has changed the picture in a fundamental way.

For the first time in American history, we have a man in the White House who consciously and brazenly disregards his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution. That's why I say the greatest threat to our Constitution, our safety and our liberties, is internal. Our president is an enemy of our Constitution, and, as such, he is a danger to our safety, our security and our personal freedoms.

Barack Obama is one of the most powerful presidents this nation has seen in generations. He is powerful because he is supported by large majorities in Congress, but, more importantly, because he does not feel constrained by the rule of law. Whether he is putting up the weakest possible defense of the Defense of Marriage Act despite the Justice Department's legal obligation to support existing law; disenfranchising Chrysler and GM bondholders in order to transfer billions of investor dollars to his supporters in the United Auto Workers; or implementing yet a third offshore oil-drilling moratorium even after two federal courts have thrown out two previous moratoriums, President Obama is determined to see things done his way regardless of obstacles. To Mr. Obama, the rule of law is a mere inconvenience to be ignored, overcome or "transcended" through international agreements or "norms."

Mr. Obama's paramount goal, as he so memorably put it during his campaign in 2008, is to "fundamentally transform America." He has not proposed improving America - he is intent on changing its most essential character. The words he has chosen to describe his goals are neither the words nor the motivation of just any liberal Democratic politician. This is the utopian, or rather dystopian, reverie of a dedicated Marxist - a dedicated Marxist who lives in the White House.

Because of the power he wields over budgets, the judiciary, national defense and even health care, his regime and his program are not just about changing public policy in the conventional sense. When one considers the combination of his stop-at-nothing attitude, his contempt for limited government, his appointment of judges who want to create law rather than interpret it - all of these make this president today's single greatest threat to the great experiment in freedom that is our republic.

ALSO:

Jeffrey Kuhner: President's Socialist Takeover Must Be Stopped

President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.

He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.

Nullification: Interview with a Zombie

Unconstitutional law should not be inforced. The liberal zombie interviewer sounds just like the progressives on this blog.

Obama Admin Under Investigation For Racial Bias In Closing Car Dealers

The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.

Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.

More at link:

www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/race_played_role_in_obama_car.html                 I've been hearing about this for some time now as I know many of the car dealers  in my area that got closed down and the ones that stayed. It sure does look like that "social justice" is just reverse discrimination with a different name. Does it seem like we are "post racial" now? What gives the government the right to pick and choose winners? What gives them the right to pick those winners based on race or sex? Is this "social justice"? Do you really believe that equal justice is wrong  and we need the federal government to make things "right"? These dealers worked their butts off to build a business and the government steps in and closes them down. They paid a lot of money to start and keep their dealerships and now they have nothing but debt and large properties that no one wants. This is wrong no matter what party you belong to. And to discriminate based on sex and color is wrong no matter who it is against.

Internet Video: ACORN Storms Chase Bank Branch?

ShareThis

Just look at these animals. We will see a lot more of this kind of insurrection from the left wing activist. Who among you think that what these animals are doing is right? This is a business not a public arena. All I hear is "We want" from the left. If you ever see anything like this call the cops and then Fox news. Because the cops might not do anything but Fox News will. I'm just waiting for more riots when Obama and the Democrats inflame the left wing with more blame to business and the "wealthy". What gives the left the right to be prejudice towards the "rich". Do we not all have equal right in this country? This social justice is just another form of bigotry from the left. The "rich" give you jobs stupids. When will you understand? And this new financial control bill will make it impossible to give those idiots loans thanks the the Democratic party ands Obama. Those banks now get punished or sticking their neck out and giving mutts like that loans. Who do you think that will effect most? The slumlords are going to love this. I wonder why they aren't at Freddy and Fanny protesting? Or Chris Dodd's house and Rangle's. The Democratic party put the same people and entities in charge over the same financial system that the helped collapse. If it wasn't for the government making the banks give questionable loans we wouldn't be in this mess. And if you think that this bill fixes anything then ask yourself why isn't Freddy and Fanny written into the bill? If you can't see that this financial control bill is bad for this country and those idiots protesting then you are high or an idiot. And if these lieing POS tell us something about the bill ask where it is in the bill. Because this Congress and President have lied too us way too many time for us to even try and believe them. The will bang the Democratic parties drum without a reasonable thought to what they are doing. But they have so much hate in their heart for us that they can't even see it.

Riots Erupt in Oakland

OAKLAND, Calif. Violent protests erupted in Oakland with stores damaged and dozens arrested after a Los Angeles jury convicted a white former transit officer of involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man.

Prosecutors had wanted Johannes Mehserle convicted of murdering Oscar Grant. So Thursday's lesser verdict raised concerns of a repeat of the rioting that followed the shooting on New Year's Day in 2009 on an Oakland train platform. The trial was moved to Los Angeles following the riots.

Police in riot gear Thursday had maintained a watchful eye over a crowd of protesters as emotions ran high with about 500 people marching in the street. Members of a crowd near City Hall moaned and cursed when they heard the verdict.

Sporadic violence later broke out and police said they made 83 arrests throughout the night for violations that included failure to disperse, vandalism and assaulting a police officer.

At least a dozen businesses were damaged, including a looted Foot Locker store and a ransacked jewelry store, police said. Protesters also smashed the windows of a bank, set fires in several trash bins, and detonated a small incendiary device near a police station that caused no damage.

"This city is not the wild, wild west," said Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts. "This city will not tolerate this sort of activity."

Though police did not release a damage estimate, the protesting appeared to be much less severe than the rioting that hit Oakland after Grant was shot.

Even though the protests wound down late Thursday, Batts expected the number of arrests to double overnight.

During the trial, prosecutors said the 28-year-old Mehserle became angry at the 22-year-old Grant for resisting arrest. He was shot in the back while he lay face-down. Mehserle claims he mistakenly drew his gun instead of his Taser.
The writing is on the wall. If you aren't preparded for more of this kind of actions then you are taking a big risk. Prepare for the worse and pray for the best. And we have seen what kind of cold hearted bastards these liberals can be.