Howard Dean believes the Massachusetts voters were sending a message to Washington, D.C. , agree with him, but voted for the conservative Republican candidate? This interview provides valuable insight into the mind of the Deaniac.
URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui4ElSz_bKU It looks like Chris Mathews lost that loving feeling that went down his leg. How illogical can these liberals be? Howard Deaniac is quoting the Poll that Bruce quoted us. Now is there a person on this planet that truly believes what Howard Deaniac is saying to be right? The Democrats are as out of touch with the American voters and this is just more proof of the derangment coming from the Democrat Party. How can anyone listen to these Democrat jokers anymore? How can you not sit back and laugh at these to liberals making fools of themselves and the party they have supported in the past? This has become the special olympics of political debate. At least Mathews has become somewhat lucid and sees the Democrat Party for what they are not what they once were. I hope the left wing keeps quoting that one study that shows that the people of Mass. voted for Scott Brown because they wanted the public option Coakley would have voted for. I was called dumb on a Progressive blog because I agree with Chris Mathews on this. I'm glade I found this video because it's nice to know I'm not alone in being dumb to the Progressives.lol. Today is the national day of make laugh at the liberals day. Lets make it a year long celebration.
The liberals need to boycott Chris Mathews and the network. They need to write letters to him and the network. They have to get the word out and attack him with full force. If they don't force Mathews back in liberal line he could greatly effect the liberal audiance. They can't have that now could they? That is what the liberals did with everyone on Fox News and conservative talk radio. It might work with Mathews and whoever the network is that carries him. Remember what the 'Progressives' did to Lou Dobbs when he got out of step with the 'progressive agenda'? Maybe Obama will give those liberal networks a bailout if they stay in step with his agenda. Kind of like what they have been doing all along with our money. That video is going to be a clasic on the blogs.BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.Weak Progressacrats!
ReplyDeleteDear Chris,
ReplyDeleteOn Tuesday, Massachusetts voters proved yet again that the American people are fed up with secret back room dealings and giveaways to Big Labor bosses.
What did Martha Coakley’s downfall prove?
It’s politically poisonous to be seen making a sweetheart deal with Big Labor a week before an election . . .
. . . and it’s politically poisonous to be in favor of a healthcare plan that is little more than a forced unionism Trojan Horse.
The union bosses came HARD at Scott Brown – including firefighter union bosses who called his election “the death” of the Police and Firefighters Monopoly Bargaining Bill, a toxic piece of legislation that would force first responders into dues-paying ranks by federal fiat.
But the truth is, the battle is far from over.
Remember, just last week, it was revealed that the union bosses would be getting exactly what they wanted from the health care overhaul – numerous special privileges and a $60 Billion exemption from Obama’s new taxes on hardworking Americans.
And top union czars are increasing their calls for the Pelosi-Reid Congress to pass the Card Check Forced Unionism Bill as soon as possible. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka predicted last week the job-killing bill would pass in early 2010, and SEIU president Andy Stern – the most frequent visitor to the White House last year – is saying the same thing.
With Brown’s election, the Republican Senate minority theoretically has 41 votes needed to block these union boss power grabs, but you and I both know that there are a handful of union-boss apologists in the Republican Caucus as well.
It would only take one of these Republicans to give in to election year pressure or fall prey to a phony “compromise” on card check – and Big Labor could be victorious.
You and I can’t let that happen, and together, we can make a difference. Just ask Erroll Southers.
Over the last two weeks, we’ve told you to call your Senators to oppose Southers’ nomination to head the Transportation Security Administration until he publicly pledged to oppose any legislation or executive policy that would force all Transportation Security Agency (TSA) employees under union boss control.
Your calls worked. On Wednesday, Southers withdrew his name from consideration in a cloud of controversy. But you can be sure – the union bosses are still looking to exploit the foiled Christmas Day terrorist attack to take control of airport security personnel.
Bottom line: the union bosses aren’t going to give up on TSA forced unionization, ObamaCare, or the Card Check Forced Unionism Bill just because Scott Brown defeated Martha Coakley.
That’s why your continued support of the National Right to Work Committee is so important. Please make a contribution today. And thank you for what you do to further this cause.
Sincerely,
Doug Stafford
The National Right to Work Committee is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose citizens' organization dedicated to combating compulsory unionism through an aggressive program designed to mobilize public opposition to compulsory unionism and, at the same time, enlist public support for Right to Work legislation. The Committee's mailing address is 8001 Braddock Road, Springfield, Virginia 22160. The Committee can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-325-7892. Its web address is http://nrtwc.org/ Keep up the wonderful work you are doing for this free nation. God bless you Chris and your readers.
Chris - Did you see LIEberal Jon Steward rip into ultra-radical nutjob LIEberal Dumbermann?!?! Here is the link to the video. http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2010/01/22/video-jon-stewart-destroys-keith-olbermann/
ReplyDeleteBWAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... just think, Dumbermann is too liberal even for Jon Stewart!! LOL ... oh man, two of Bruce "Epic" FAILk's heroes going at it ... this is going to be fantastic. I love seeing the Hypocrats tear their own party apart. What a bunch of dumbasses! LOL
Oh, and Chris, I thought Matthews was already being boycotted. Just going by the viewership, if I started watching Matthews that would double his viewers. BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... I can't wait to see MSNBC, including Matthews, MadCOW and Dumbermann going the way of Air America.
Doug - thanks for the information. Did you see that union membership is declining? That's why those losers want the government to step in so that they can try to force ... er ... give more people the "option" of joining the union.
ReplyDeleteIf the unions were such a good idea people would be all for getting into them. With declining numbers, I say it is time to let natural selection do its work and let the unions die off like the useless teat-suckers that they are. Nobody can name one good thing the unions have done in the last 4 decades can they?!?!? BWAAAHAHAHAHA
LOL ... I just can't stop laughing at the LIEberal Hypocrats today. SOOOO many great stories, like this one contrasting Hillary Clinton's statements from '98, when BJ was getting raked over the coals on the internet for schtupping an intern, with her statements now about regulating the internet (specifically her chastising of China for regulating). What a bunch of HYPOCRITES you lieberals are! It never ceases to amaze me. It's like witnessing someone who has abilities that you never dreamed possible. I never dreamed, growing up in a conservative family, how hypocritical LIEberals can be!! LOL
ReplyDelete---------
FLASHBACK: HILLARY CLINTON SAYS INTERNET NEWS NEEDS 'RETHINK' Sun Sep 25 2005
China on Sunday imposed new media restrictions designed to limit the news and other information available to Internet users, sharply restricting the scope of content that can be posted on Web sites.
Hillary Rodham Clinton said IN 1998 during a meeting with reporters said that "we are all going to have to rethink how we deal with" the Internet because of the handling of White House sex scandal stories on Web sites.
Clinton was asked whether she favored curbs on the Internet, after the DRUDGE REPORT made headlines with coverage of her husband's affair with a White House intern. "We are all going to have to rethink how we deal with this, because there are all these competing values ... Without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function, what does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation?" she said.
Hillary Clinton Continued:
"I don't have any clue about what we're going to do legally, regulatorily, technologically -- I don't have a clue. But I do think we always have to keep competing interests in balance. I'm a big pro-balance person. That's why I love the founders -- checks and balances; accountable power. Anytime an individual or an institution or an invention leaps so far out ahead of that balance and throws a system, whatever it might be -- political, economic, technological --out of balance, you've got a problem, because then it can lead to the oppression people's rights, it can lead to the manipulation of information, it can lead to all kinds of bad outcomes which we have seen historically. So we're going to have to deal with that. And I hope a lot of smart people are going to --"
REPORTER: Sounds like you favor regulation.
MRS. CLINTON: Bill, I don't know what -- that's why I said I don't know what I'm in favor of. And I don't know enough to know what to be in favor of, because I think it's one of those new issues we've got to address. We've got to see whether our existing laws protect people's right of privacy, protect them against defamation. And if they can, how do you do that when you can press a button and you can't take it back. So I think we have to tread carefully.
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
ReplyDeleteThursday, January 21, 2010
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -18 (see trends).
Overall, 45% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance. Fifty-four percent (54%) disapprove.
John that is because Obama hasn't been progressive enough. I don't care what the polls say. You fucking assholes can go and kill yourselves with the polls. You just need to shut up. If the republicans block free health care there will be riots. Do you want that to happen? Bruce and Joe you have good blogs.
ReplyDeleteIf Republicans will study the returns from Massachusetts, then review the returns from Virginia and New Jersey, light will fall upon the path to victory over Barack Obama in 2012.
ReplyDeleteObama defeated John McCain by winning the black vote 24 to one, the Hispanic vote two to one and taking a larger share of the white vote, 44 percent, than did John Kerry or Al Gore. As the white vote was three-fourths of the national turnout, Obama coasted to victory.
Now consider Massachusetts. In the 2008 election, no less than 79 percent of the voters were white, and Obama carried them by 20 points, winning the state 62 to 36.
How did Scott Brown turn that 26-point deficit into a six-point victory? By winning the white vote as massively as did Obama. While there are no exit polls to prove it, we do have exit polls from Virginia and New Jersey, which tend to corroborate it.
Bob McDonnell won the Virginia governor's race by 17, while McCain lost Virginia by six. As McDonnell did equally poorly with African-Americans, losing the black vote 90 to nine, while McCain's lost it 92 to eight, what explains his Virginia landslide?
The white vote. McDonnell won Virginia's white vote 68 to 32, though his opponent was a downstate Democrat more conservative than the Northern Virginia candidates he beat in the primary.
In New Jersey, same story. McCain won 8 percent of the black vote. Gov. Chris Christie won 8 percent of the black vote. How did Christie turn a McCain loss of New Jersey by 16 points into a five-point victory?
The white vote. McCain won the white vote in New Jersey 50 to 49, but Christie won the white vote 59 to 34, almost two to one.
Republicans have won three major races -- two of them upsets and one a Massachusetts miracle -- because the white share of the vote in all three rose as a share of the total vote, and Republicans swept the white vote in Reagan-like landslides.
What explains the white surge to the GOP?
First, sinking white support for Obama, seen as ineffectual in ending the recession and stopping the loss of jobs.
Second, a growing perception that Obama is biased. When the president blurted that the Cambridge cops and Sgt. James Crowley "acted stupidly" in arresting black Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates -- a rush to judgment that proved wrong -- his support sank in white America and especially in Massachusetts, where black Gov. Deval Patrick joined in piling on Crowley. Deval is now in trouble, too.
Then there was Obama's appointment of Puerto Rican American Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Her militant support for race and ethnic preferences and her decision to deny Frank Ricci and the white firefighters of New Haven a hearing on their case that they were denied promotions they won in competitive exams because they were white caused 31 GOP senators to vote against her.
While Massachusetts is Democrat over Republican three to one, Reagan carried the state in 1984 and Hillary Clinton clobbered Obama in the 2008 primary, though the Kennedys were in Obama's corner. The Scott Brown Democrats were the Hillary Democrats were the Reagan Democrats.
But if McDonnell, Christie and Brown could roll up large enough shares of the white vote to win in three major states McCain lost, why did McCain lose all three?
Answer: In 2008, the working and middle class had had a bellyful of the Bush-McCain Republicans. They were seen as pro-amnesty for illegal aliens and pro-NAFTA, when U.S. workers had watched 5 million manufacturing jobs disappear in a decade -- and reappear in China. They were willing to give Obama a chance because Obama had persuaded them by November he was not just another big-spending utopian liberal.
So what have Obama and Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi been doing for a year? Crafting a federal takeover of health care with a vast plan that provides coverage for the uninsured -- most of whom are minorities -- while sticking it to Medicare recipients, 80 percent to 90 percent of whom are white.
ReplyDeleteImmigrants are 21 percent of the uninsured, but only 7 percent of the population. This means white folks on Medicare or headed there will see benefits curtailed, while new arrivals from the Third World, whence almost all immigrants come, get taxpayer-subsidized health insurance. Any wonder why all those Tea Party and town-hall protests seem to be made up of angry white folks?
What the McDonnell, Christie and Brown victories teach is that the GOP should stop listening to the Wall Street Journal and start listening to these forgotten Americans.
An end to affirmative action and ethnic preferences, an end to bailouts of Wall Street bankers, a moratorium on immigration until unemployment falls to 6 percent, an industrial policy that creates jobs here and stops shipping them to China appear a winning hand in 2012.
Right on anonymous. If you believe FAILk and the other guy have great blogs then your brain is obviously stuck on stupid. Not even sure if it has another gear. Anyway, I don't know how much more "regressive" Obummer can get. Maybe if he nationalized the rest of the industry and banks he might get a little more to the left. But good luck with it commie.
ReplyDeleteJohn,I have noticed that the Democrats have been socializing the banks and auto comp. loses while privitizing the gains. Do you think this is how they payoff their big business and Wall St. conections?
ReplyDeleteThat Jon Stewart is a funny one. Have you looked at the Dow tanking? Why does it always happen when Pres.Obama talks? Why does Pres. Obama hate the job makers so much?
ReplyDeleteJOB Makers are Nobamas Enemy Cause with JOBS there is NO NEED for HIS Socialist AGENDA! Private Sector is HIS Enemy and he WILL DO Whatever it Takes to MAKE it and Economy Collapse. What other POSSIBLE Reason can there Be for His actions Since he Became President! LIBS out there NAME ONE Thing,JUST ONE that this ADMINISTRATION has DONE to SPUR JOB Growth. I Will give YOU the Answer CAUSE you WONt. The Answer is ZERO, ZIP, NIL, NOTHING and Of COARSE ITS Bushes FAULT!
ReplyDeleteOne area of ECONOMY Starts Moving Stock Market and HE then Goes AFTER it, Threatening Regulations and TAXES that by the WAY will be PICKED up BY WHOM Libs, Whom in the END will Pay for that 13 Billion Dollar Tab? TAX PAYERS LIBS thats Who. Considering MOST if NOT All of the TARP payments have been PAYED Back PLUS Interset, SEEMS,Nobama is ONCE Again TARGETING ECONOMY which IS HIS ENEMY!
Libs out there HOW will the Stock Market taking ANOTHER DIVED Caused by Nobama HELP those 401K or Other Money, Retirement Systems have INVESTED in it?
In Ohio Today Nobama Sounds like hes again on the CAMPAIGN Trail LOTA TALK NO LEADERSHIP! One Termer will have ALOT of Time After 2012 to WORK on HIS Speeches! Voters Mr. OBAMA You WOKE UP and that is WHAT will MAKE YOUR Administration a 4 Year and outter!
kelvin, i wonder why the dow is doing so horrible too. Its only up 2,000 points since may. God the sky is falling the sky is falling. lmao
ReplyDeleteAl, I have to disagree with you. He has spurred job growth in GIVERNMENT jobs! Look at those no-contributing jobs go, and you know how they get their paychecks. By sucking the wealth out of taxpayers, and in return we get nothing of value. 2012 isn't coming fast enough for me, but at least we'll have our 2010 elections to keep us busy throwing these Hypocrats out on their ears.
ReplyDeleteKelvin, Al hit it right on the head. Obummer saw the economy righting itself DESPITE everything he is doing to tank it, and then he makes a statement like he made yesterday to drive it back down. Cloward Piven at its finest. Obummer the Socialist will be stepping in in no time to "save" us all from the panic of his own creation.
ReplyDeleteWhat's that saying ... the government makes you lame then hands you a crutch (paid for on the taxpayer's dime of course) and says "see, if it wasn't for me you couldn't walk".
JoeC You seemed to have FORGOT telling Me What the Nobama Administration HAS Done to MAKE Jobs or WHAT the Administration Has DONE to get the Economy Moving! ANYTHING JoeC?
ReplyDeleteHere's a great article on the failures of Obummer, written by a guy who is NO conservative. It's quite lengthy so I'm just posting the link.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/mzuckerman/2010/01/21/mort-zuckerman-the-incredible-deflation-of-barack-obama.html
Be sure to read some of the comments, there are some great ones like this:
Hantayo of CA
Jan 22, 2010 16:17:44 PM
Stock Market
I'm one of those greedy Wall Street types, I'm a mechanic that has a 401K...I know I've got it coming
The stock market was about the only thing working in this 'transformed' economy, and now barrack is managing to fukk that up. Thanks dikkhead I was almost even.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... even California gets it! What is the rest of the LIEberal's problem that they can't see the forest for the trees?
Here's another one from Zuckerman. He touches on some of the same things as he does on the previous link, but I find this one even more hilarious because he's totally apoplectic. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA ... he's pointing out what a failure Obummer is, and really I could never do a better job of refuting every claim that FAILk has ever made. So FAILk, is your fellow LIEberal Zuckerman wrong, because he is saying what the rest of us have been telling you for quite a while now. Oh, and who is wrong, Jon Stewart or Keith Dumbermann? ROFLMAO ...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-01-19/hes-done-everything-wrong/?cid=bs:archive3
It's a symptom of a bigger problem Joe. Obama's constant attacks on business have nothing to do with the Dow and unemployment does it Joe? You need to pay attention Joe.
ReplyDeleteI get more from this blog then any other place. I found you from google and another blog that talked about this blog. It is a good way to learn about America and English. Obama is making America third world country if he keeps going?
ReplyDelete>
ReplyDelete> Take a look at this... Change that we can believe in…
> Please read this, especially the
> reference to pages 58 & 59
>> Thomas Edwards, editor of The River
> Cities Tribune, was contacted to get
> legal permission to quote David Kithil's
> comments. Permission was
> granted, so here are excerpts from the
> article, giving EXACT pages and
> paragraphs in the bill and why it is so
> bad.
>
> You can forward this to all of your email
> contacts. I think Judge Kithil
> hits everything right on the head, and
> the opposition you may encounter
> cannot argue over these points:
>
> JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
>
> "I have reviewed selected sections of the
> bill and find it unbelievable
> that our Congress, led by Speaker Nancy
> Pelosi, could come up with a bill
> loaded with so many wrong-headed elements.
>
> We do need to reform the health insurance
> system in America in order to
> make coverage affordable and available to
> everyone. But, how many of us
> believe our federal government can manage
> a new program any better than
> the bankrupt Medicare program or the
> underfunded Social Security program?
>
> "Both Republicans and Democrats are
> equally responsible for the financial
> mess of those two programs.
>
> "I am opposed to HB 3200 for a number of
> reasons. To start with, it is
> estimated that a federal bureaucracy of
> more than 150,000 new employees
> will be required to administer HB3200.
> That is an unacceptable expansion
> of a government that is already too
> intrusive in our lives. If we are
> going to hire 150,000 new employees, let's
> put them to work protecting
> our borders, fighting the massive drug
> problem and putting more law
> enforcement/firefighters out there."
>
> NOW, here comes the good stuff:
>
> JUDGE KITHIL continued: "Other problems
> I have with this bill include:
>
> ** Page 50/section 152: The bill will
> provide insurance to all non-U.S.
> residents, even if they are here
> illegally.
>
>
> ** Page 58 and 59: The government will
> have real-time access to an
> individual's bank account and will have
> the authority to make electronic
> fund transfers from those accounts.
>
>
> ** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be
ReplyDelete> subsidized (by the government)
> for all union members, union retirees and
> for community organizations
> (such as the Association of Community
> Organizations for Reform Now -
> ACORN).
>
>
> ** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed
> under this section will not be
> treated as a tax.. (How could anybody in
> their right mind come up with
> that?)
>
>
> ** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be
> paid the same regardless of
> specialty, and the government will set all
> doctors' fees.
>
>
> ** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer
> hospital will ration care according to
> the patient's age.
>
>
> ** Page 317 and 321: The government will
> impose a prohibition on hospital
> expansion;however, communities may
> petition for an exception.
>
>
> ** Page 425, line 4-12: The government
> mandates advance-care planning
> consultations. Those on Social Security
> will be required to attend an
> "end-of-life planning" seminar every five
> years.
>
>
> ** Page 429, line 13-25: The government
> will specify which doctors can
> write an end-of-life order.
>
>
> HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes
> on:
>
>
> "Finally, it is specifically stated this
> bill will not apply to members
> of Congress. Members of Congress are
> already exempt from the Social
> Security system and have a well-funded
> private plan that covers their
> retirement needs. If they were on our
> Social Security plan, I believe
> they would find a very quick 'fix' to
> make the plan financially sound for
> the future."
>
> Honorable David Kithil
> Marble Falls , Texas
>
>
> All of the above should give you all the
> point blank ammo you need to support your
> opposition to Obamacare. Please send
> this information on to all your email
> contacts.
Wow it's been busy on here. I just watched Glenn Beck's Special. What a great job he did on it. It is a great documentary. Everyone even the left need to watch it. Don't worry you don't have to watch Beck as he isn't in it much.
ReplyDeleteThat show of Becks was the bomb. I learned sooooooo much from it. Can you post it?
ReplyDeleteAl, its hard to keep up with all the tutoring i have to do for you. Perhaps you could just use the net and find it yourself. After all your not paying me for the education i give you and it takes up my time. Even a socialist has to make money.
ReplyDeleteAl, as for the economy, i think the stimulus package was a major force behind the 3rd quarter GDP growth. While it did not stop unemployment, i think it helped stabilise the economy and kept unemployment from going much deeper.
ReplyDeleteThere are plenty of economists that share the same view.
JoeC Thanks for the OFFER but YOUR Tutoring is NOT Working JoeC!
ReplyDeleteStimulus worked WELL I bet the NEWLY Unemployed will be Happy to hear YOUR words of Encouagement JoeC! The People with their 401s and Retirement Programs Invested in Stock Market will also be ENCOURAGED by your BRILLIANT INSIGHT!
GDP Growth That will also make the Newly UNEMPLOYED Feel Better JoeC and thats what LIBS DO Make People Feel Better,DONT Solve Problems but its that FEEL GOOD thing right JoeC!
The stimulus wasn't meant to help the unemployment Joe. It help all of Obamas peoples. But you are an intellectual that gets all his knowledge from the History Ch. and Animal Planet. Oh and don't forget the Solodarity Mag. from the UAW.
ReplyDelete