Monday, February 1, 2010

“We want results, not rhetoric. We want cooperation, not partisanship.”

How can the Democrats keep blaming Bush/Republicans with this kind of data?
As Obama releases his latest budget today, here’s something to think about. We’ve heard the speeches and the promises. What are the results? From House Republicans:

Republicans “Better Solutions”
And in case you haven’t heard, Republicans do have a better idea. Their “Better Solutions” document outlines the ideas they have offered over the past year to address:
  • Jobs
  • Health Care
  • Fiscal Responsibility
  • Open Government and Transparency
  • Energy
  • Savings
  • National Security
  • Financial Reform
Get your copy of “Better Solutions” here. Don't loose "Hope" yet. As more and more Americans are feeling hopeless we need to think about the future not the past. Washington is need of real "Change". And come this Nov.2010 and 2012 we need to take back America. We need to vote for real change not the retoric that the Democrats gave us. If  "Better Solutions" is the kind of change you want to see then vote for that change.


  1. Wow, this administration is EPIC FAIL. Hypocrats - EPIC FAIL. Obummer - EPIC FAIL. And now read this:

    Obama's Cabinet Has Least Amount of Private-Sector Experience... Ever

    Via Powerline comes this quote from Investors Business Daily that explains why the stock markets have been jittery and why economic recovery is fragile at best:

    Right now, the market seems to be saying: "It's the policies, stupid." Specifically, the socialistic policies that the Obama administration keeps pushing at Americans who know that's not the way this great country was built. It isn't just the efforts to socialize medicine or nationalize the car industry or control banks or punish both consumers and industry for climate variations that have little to do with it either. It's every initiative that comes out of this White House.
    It is not shocking that the Obama administration has blasted the economy. Via IBD, we can see that Obama's administration has the least amount of experience, information, and knowledge about the economy, business, job creation, investment, or anything else that happens in the private-sector. Obama himself is clueless about these things, living his whole life in a bubble of government, school, community organizing, and a brief stint in elected office, and he has chosen to surround himself by equally clueless individuals. Don't take my word for it- here is the graph:

  2. Obummer is bowing again. To the Mayor of Tampa. Is there anybody he won't bow to?!?! ROFLMAO

    I mean ... I have to admit, I thought this was a joke, a PhotoShopped picture or something, but nope, here it is on Yahoo:

    What an EMBARRASSMENT! The Mayor of Tampa Florida?!?! WTF?!?! BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

    I can't wait to hear the Hypocrats' explanation for this one!!! BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

    Oh my God, WHAT a MORON!

  3. Another Obummer State of the Campaign Speech lie exposed:

  4. Thanks for declaring what a greedy, corrupt hosebag Peters is Bruce. Nothing like calling out someone in your own party, that's big of you.

  5. John,you are one crazy asshole. Take the fact that Peters has outraised his Republican opponents you call him greedy. Classic!!!!!

    You are unbelieveable.

  6. Get a sense of humor Bruce. He was making fun of your talking points.

  7. How in the hell can you say this is Obamas fault? You people are just racist that can't stand a black man telling you what to do. This is reperations and President Obama is spreading the wealth.

  8. Obama's false claims taken to task

    A conservative legal scholar and former member of the Federal Election Commission says President Obama made two claims in his State of the Union speech about the Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case that are "categorically and undeniable false."

    During his address last Wednesday, the president asserted that the Supreme Court had "reversed a century of law to open the floodgates -- including foreign corporations to spend without limits in our elections."

    Hans von Spakovsky, a legal scholar at The Heritage Foundation, notes that Congress did not ban independent political expenditures by corporations and labor unions until 1947 -- but for three decades after the law was passed, the Supreme Court "went out of its way" to avoid upholding its constitutionality.

    He says it is also "completely wrong" for the president to claim the Supreme Court has cleared the way for "foreign corporations" to spend without limit on U.S. elections.

    "There's a federal statute," explains the scholar, "that bans foreign corporations, foreign governments, foreign political parties, and foreign individuals from not only contributing money to federal candidates, but they also cannot engage in what's called 'independent political expenditures.'

    "So they can't take out money to buy an ad, say, in The New York Times...supporting or opposing a candidate," he concludes.

    Von Spakovsky says President Obama should know better than to make those false claims because he taught a voting rights class at the University of Chicago that covered campaign finance law.

    So is President Barack Hussein Obama stupid or just a bad liar? To date Pres.Obama has been found lieing 76 times. So is he a liar or just not that sharp?

  9. Hey FAILk, he's corrupt as all hell. Go on over to and look at how dirty Gary Peters is. That's how he "raised" money, from the lobbyists that bought him. Dirty f**king Hypocrats. I see you don't answer anything about that you pussy. Hypocrats are the dirtiest politicians ever.

    So, just to summarize, Gary Peters is a dirty filthy corrupt politician that is owned by lawyers, Big Corporations, Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and Unions. They "lobby" aka bribe him in the form of adding to his war chest. And Bruce FAILk is proud as a papa about it. Classic FAILk, proud of his Hypocrats for being corrupt.


  10. Obama is a liar. Can and does anyone dispute this with a straight face?

  11. Look at this liar Barack Hussein Obama get called out on his lies. 16 lies in 7 minutes during his State of the Campaign speech. LOL ... what a total LIAR these Hypocrats are! Shame on the Republicans for just letting him stand there and tell lie after lie, but they are just too respectful I guess.

    FAILk, what do you have to say about all these lies that Obummer was caught in?!?! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

  12. By the way, negro dialect alert at 5:35 in the video. Harry Reid has this playing on a loop. BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

    "Brother" Blair. That negro Obummer is a funny guy.

  13. Look at what a bunch of idiots this DNC is. Total MORONS, spending money on advertisements for Nelson so he could bag on the Public Option. GOD these Hypocrats are stunningly, obscenely DUMB! BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA
    DNC Defends Spending $460k On Nelson's Anti-Public Option Ad

    The Democratic National Committee is defending its decision to spend nearly $500,000 on television ads that, in the process of defending Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) for his support of health care reform, took a swipe at a public option for insurance coverage.

    On Monday, Joe Sudbay of Americablog reported that the DNC had forked over $459,760.00 to the Nebraska Democratic Committee, which, in turn, used that money to sponsor television ads on Nelson's behalf. Those ads featured the Senator explaining his support for health care legislation by, in part, noting he had changed the legislation so that insurance coverage would not be "run by the government." It was a clear slight at the public plan.

    A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Jim Manley, told Ben Smith of Politico that the money was not part of the deal to get Nelson's vote. But the real question was why would the DNC pay for ads that maligned government run insurance at the same time the party was rallying behind that very proposal.

    Asked about the expenditure, DNC Press Secretary Hari Sevugan sent over a statement that glosses over the question of how strongly the committee was devoted to the public option in favor of pointing out that Nelson was (then and now) under immense political pressure.

    "We, the Democratic Party, were defending a Democratic senator from attacks from the health insurance industry and other special interests for his support of reform," Sevugan writes. "Senator Nelson is not the first Democrat we have defended from these attacks and he will not be the last. We've spent money directly in support of House Democrats who have supported reform in the form of TV and radio ads and we've also worked with state parties to defend Democrats like Senators Nelson, Lincoln and Dorgan who have stood up to the insurance industry in support of reform."

  14. LOL ... Dems are coming out of the woodwork to piss all over Obummer's "budget". BWAAAAHAHAHAHA ... this noted Regressive disagrees in a big way with noted "deficit hawk" Obummer. Love to watch those Hypocrats eat each other alive.
    Robin Carnahan 'Disappointed' In Obama's Lack Of Fiscal Discipline

    Perhaps the most telling indicator of President Barack Obama's standing in the forum of popular opinion comes when Democratic congressional candidates are forced to weigh in on his various proposals.

    So it is not without significance that hours after the White House introduced its FY2011 budget proposal Democratic Senate candidate Robin Carnahan -- Missouri's Secretary of State and a figure well liked within the progressive community -- put out a statement expressing what she called her disappointment with Obama's lack of fiscal discipline.

    "From where I stand here in Missouri, I'm disappointed in the President's budget recommendation. Budgets are about setting priorities and it's time Washington started making fiscal discipline and tackling the long-term budget deficit higher priorities.
    "For too long, officials in Washington, including Congressman Blunt, have contributed to our country's growing deficit with their wasteful government spending, earmarks and favors for corporate special interests. In fact, as part of the Republican Congressional leadership, Congressman Blunt helped turn a $128 million surplus in 2001 into a $1.2 trillion deficit by 2009.

    "Missouri families have to balance their checkbooks and our government should be no different, so I urge our elected officials in Washington on both sides of the aisle to work together to get our country's long term deficit under control."

    Statements like these follow the distinctively Missouri style of politics, where budget discipline and deficit hawkery are golden traits. It's the platform on which Sen. Claire McCaskill rode into office in 2006.

    But for an Obama White House that is touting the deficit reducing measures it has thrown into the budget (from discretionary spending caps, to perspective cuts in defense programs, to "restoring some balance to the tax code") comments like Carnahan's don't necessarily help.

  15. Chris, if Republicans were serious about bipartisanship and solutions they would vote with the Democrats on major legislation. Bipartisanship doesn't mean Republicans get everything they want.

    Even bills that Republicans have co-sponsored, they have ended up voting against.

    Republicans don't want bipartisanship. They want to use their No votes to try to win the next round of elections in November.

    Republicans don't want to work with President Obama. They want to destroy him and the country along with him.

  16. John, I went to I don't see anything that says Gary Peters is a liar or corrupt in any way.

    Most of his money comes from individuals like me, who think Gary has been doing a great job for the people of the 9th District of Michigan.

    He's been bringing home jobs, working hard for the people of his district.

    He's done nothing that would make it reasonable for you to use the kind of language you used in your comment.

  17. I know Bruce if the Republicans were serious about bipartisanship they would sit down and shut up. And just do what the Democrats want. You are dumb Bruce.

  18. No, Chris, they would come to the table, negotiate, compromise and then vote with the Democrats on major legislation.

    Republicans do not negotiate in good faith.

    What they essentially say is, incorporate our ideas, then they vote not anyway.

    That's not how bipartisanship works.

  19. So Bruce is blowing up this country using our debt and the budget instead of a bomb what the Republicans need to do? Do the Republicans need to follow dumb unwanted legislation so that the Democrats can play their blame game? They just want to blame the Republicans for these bills when they go bad. It's a trap and the Republicans aint taking the bait. The Democrats own these abortions of bills they have and are trying to pass. The Democrats even included the money they will make from Cap and Trade within the $3.6 TRILLION budget. They did that when there is even more evidence that this Global Warming this is just a Progressive scam on the American people. You progressives are nothing more then social pirates. You take Billions of our $ give us back a pitance and then say it worked. Are they nuts?

  20. And by the way Bruce they were not aloud into the room let alone to the table. Obama himself said he didn't want them helping fix the mess.

  21. Bruce Conservatives Sitting At Any Table With Liberals AINT Going to Work! Nobama Has a Socialist Agenda,You Know Big Government/Power Less Freedom for Citizens!

    Time For Talk Has LONG Past with Progressives Who Care Not For Citizens ONLY the Agenda Which is to Redistribute Wealth and Cradle to Grave Government Involvement in CITIZENS Lives!
    Most Citizens are Now AWAKE Thanks to Nobama The Sheep Herder! He is And You Libs WILL Pay in November! Citizens NOW See What He is About and Have seen and Heard His Say One Thing and DO Another and They AINT Buying the Pony Show ANYMORE!

  22. Well, then don't bitch when Democrats pass legislation without Republican input. You can't have it both ways, complaining about a lack of bipartisanship and not come to the table to negotiate in good faith and complain about the outcome.

    President Obama has reached out more than any other President I can remember.

    Stop your whining if you don't want to get in the game in a serious way.

  23. All they do is bitch. They are the Bitch Party. We will run the Republicans out in Nov. if they don't play the game. People in the IC(Inner City)are getting angry. And when they get angry they riot. If Obama and Congress don't start getting money into the IC fast it will be like the Detroit and LA riots. It will be cheeper to give them money then to let them destroy everything. Obama knows this and he will do what it takes to make his voters happy. The IC is boiling and money will stop it from boiling over. This country was build on the black man and womans blood.
    This would be payoffs like you give the Indians.

  24. Bruce and Jay-Ney, you two are full of shit. FAILk, watch that video link I provided. Obummer is listing allllll the bipartisan things that were passed. The Republicans have been more than bi-partisan. You are so full of shit it's hilarious.

    As for Peters, WHAT were YOU looking at?!?! ROFLMAO ... I'll try to post here, I can't make any promises on the formatting but look at all the lawyer money, insurance, etc. etc. this crooked corrupt a-hole is getting. Again, this is allll lobbyist money, you know what they call "bribes" when the Republicans take it. Dirty f**king Gary Peters. Owned by the health industries, unions, and lawyers. Your kind of hero FAILk.

    ActBlue $107,210
    America's Leadership PAC $10,000
    American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees $10,000
    AmeriPAC: The Fund for a Greater America $10,000
    BRIDGE PAC $10,000
    Communications Workers of America $10,000
    New Democrat Coalition $10,000
    Operating Engineers Union $10,000
    PAC to the Future $10,000
    Teamsters Union $10,000
    John R Medical Clinic $9,600
    Lakeshore Engineering $9,600
    Illuminating Concepts $9,500
    Nelson Ventures $9,200
    Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $9,000
    DLA Piper $8,250
    United Food & Commercial Workers Union $8,000
    International Assn of Fire Fighters $7,500
    Ford Motor Co $7,300
    Blue Cross/Blue Shield $7,000

  25. Hypocrats shut the doors and then ask where the Republican input is on health care. What a bunch of douchebags. Anyway, the legislation they came up with is ALLLLL Hypocrat, no input from Republicans, and as predicted it's another TOTAL EPIC FAIL from the Hypocrats. It, seriously, sucks worse than any legislation previously. So bad half the Hypocrats had to hold their noses to vote for it. What a bunch of idiots. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA ... but what do you expect when they take money from EVERYBODY, and then try to make all those money donors happy. There are going to be conflicting needs in there, and in the end it's the people who end up getting F**KED. Thanks but no thanks Hypocrats!

  26. More Gary Peters and who is contributing. Big surprises here (not):

    Look here everybody at who owns Gary Peters, that dirty ultra-radical liberal who, no surprise here, votes with Pelosi what was it, 97% of the time?!?! Boy, that's soooo bipartisan. Knollenberg was much much much more bi-partisan than this loser Peters. And that is a fact.

    Democratic/Liberal $124,370
    Lawyers/Law Firms $112,749
    Leadership PACs $68,000
    Health Professionals $48,420
    Real Estate $47,410
    Industrial Unions $41,000
    Retired $40,681
    Insurance $37,717
    Securities & Investment $37,406
    Candidate Committees $37,400
    Building Trade Unions $35,000
    Public Sector Unions $32,000
    Transportation Unions $25,000
    Misc Finance $19,750
    Lobbyists $19,700
    Hospitals/Nursing Homes $18,860
    Automotive $18,450
    Commercial Banks $16,300
    Crop Production & Basic Processing $15,000
    Education $13,700

  27. Gary Peters gets 20% of his contributions from OUTSIDE THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Now ... hmmm ... why would anyone outside of Michigan care about getting Gary Peters elected ... hmmmm .... oh yeah, that's right, because he is on several committees that control who gets favorable treatment, so he gets bribed to vote and write legislation for those out of staters. What a dirty son of a bitch Peters is FAILk, and I can say that because it's true.

  28. thing. I know the right likes to cry that their being kept out of the loop by the Dems, but then again thats the same right who complained that the Dems didn't confirm enough of Bush's nominated positions and then go and confirm less of Obama's. You can't trust what the right says, because its all biased lies.

  29. John, i looked at Ole no-show Joe and his 2008 campaign and suprise suprise, its not ver y bi-partisan. He was owned too.

    Automotive $225,850
    Real Estate $219,700
    Leadership PACs $204,018
    Lawyers/Law Firms $178,099
    Republican/Conservative $135,350
    Misc Manufacturing & Distributing $121,550
    Retired $102,275
    Lobbyists $95,480
    Pro-Israel $92,972 (is that in michigan???)

    And i like this gem...

    Out of State $452,251 (22%)

    wait is that 22% of Joe Knollenbergs money came from out of state?!?! The dirty sum bitch ...I can say that because its true.

    I can also say this because its true, Glass houses....and you got PWNED!!!

  30. John, i wanted to mention something else too. While looking up Gary Peters fiancing it turns out that 60% is individual donors. Thats not great, but its hardly Dave Kamp territory. You know Dave Kamp right? Incumbent in District 4. Well you see there's a problem with his financing, how do i say it? I'll let open secrets do it.

    PAC contributions $831,133 (81%)
    Individual Contributions $176,026 (17%)

    What was that you were sayin bout Peters???

  31. Hey, Joey, I never said it was RIGHT to get it from out of state! I think it's a bunch of bullshit. So nobody getting owned here little man!!


  32. What was I saying about Peters? I was saying that he's a corrupt little bitch Hypocrat in the pockets of the unions, health care industry and trial lawyers. I can only vote on the a-hole that is in my district Joey, people in other districts will have to take out their own trash. Are you saying that I am arguing FOR lobbyist money or something Joey?!?!? I'm fully against it you dipshit. FAILk and you are the ones that argue that your boys are straight and true, and whine and cry when corporations can contribute to campaign ads and fully vest their involvement. See, you dirty f**king Hypocrats like your little lobbying money for your incumbent's war chests. You're as dirty as they come, and I'm going to let everyone I can know about it.

    PS I hope you didn't spend too much time doing all your research just to prove me right a-hole Joey. Suck on it loser! BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA

  33. Hey Joey, by the way, thanks for bringing up a politician who is no longer even in his seat, like Knollenberg. Talk about a day late and a dollar short, dumbass.

    By the way, here's how partisan that loser Gary Peters is, and he's a lot more partisan than Knollenberg was. So like it or not, Knollenberg worked with the Hypocrats WAY more than Peters does.

    Liberal Gary Peters in lock-step with Liberal Nancy Pelosi 96% of the time
    Gary Peters ran for Congress promising to be an independent voice for Oakland County who stands up for his district, not for his political party.

    Well, Gary lied.

    In a vote analysis conducted by The Washington Post, liberal Gary Peters was found to have voted with his party and with liberal Nancy Pelosi over 96% of the time over the last 11 months.

    That puts Peters in the same company with New York's ethically-challenged Charlie Rangel, California's "Big Three Killer" Henry Waxman, Detroit's Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick and John Conyers (enough said), and Massachusetts' Barney Frank (who precipitated the mortgage-back securities meltdown).

    How does he compare to all Democratic members in the House? Gary is MORE PARTISAN than the average Democratic members and MORE PARTISAN than average Republican member.

    Who else is Peters more partisan than? Ironically enough, though professing to be an independent, moderate, pro-business fiscally conservative Democrat, Gary Peters has proven to be MORE PARTISAN than former Congressman Joe Knollenberg, whom Peters lambasted for supposedly voting in lock step with his party and with President George Bush.

    According to The Washington Post, in his last term in Congress, Rep. Joe Knollenberg's voting record was SIGNIFICANTLY LESS PARTISAN than Gary Peters.' What's more, Knollenberg was less partisan than Peters over the course of his entire eight terms in Congress.

    Peters' intensely liberal, partisan voting record isn't surprising given the fact that he was recruited, bought and paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, liberal environmentalist groups, and Big Union dollars.

    This year, Peters has accepted nearly HALF A MILLION DOLLARS in special interest campaign contributions from LOBBYISTS and POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES. That’s money from unions, from trial lawyers, from health care lobbyists and from Wall Street. Peters is NOT an independent voice; he’s bought and paid for by his liberal special interest cronies. His voting record shows it.

  34. Once again Joey demonstrates the utter stupidity of the left. He pulls out the old "well two wrongs make a right", aka "republicans did it so it's fine if the Hypocrats do it too". Grow up Joey, and get a grip, and weed out the corruption wherever it is you F**KING LOSER. Way to defend a corrupt Gary Peters, the dirtiest most partisan guy we have seen in the 9th District.

  35. That was nice of dipshit to drop in and support corruption in general and his corrupt party in particular. Way to class it up loser.


  36. John, you got owned, PWNED and you posts were epic fails.

    Everything you accuse Peters of is being done by the hypocrite republicans. Those people you vote for remember?

    I never pulled out the "two Wrongs" card. You lie there, you lying liar.

    I pulled out the "GLASS HOUSES MF-er!!!!" card. I even said in the first post. so in closing....


  37. Hey Joey, I suppose you think it's all well and fine that John Edwards birthed a kid in an illicit affair because somebody else has done it in the past as well, maybe even a Republican!! OOOOOHHHHH. That would make you happy as hell, if a Republican did it, 'cause then YOU could say that it was alllll justified!!

    That Edwards might be all well and fine for your VP material when you voted for him and Kerry, but I think the guy is a total a-hole. Always have and always will. In the Hypocrat party they classify him as "Presidential Material". Nice party you belong to there.

  38. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA ... well Joey, as I said I only have control, limited of course, over the dirty dirtbags that are representing MY district. If you don't like it you can lump it! I'm calling out MY reps. So once again, go F yourself loser! If I was taking lobbyist money (bribes) and I called Peters out on it, that would be throwing stones in glass houses you idiot. I am not taking bribes, MY REPRESENTATIVES are. You're so damn dumb you don't even understand your metaphors. LOL

    God, you and Bruce really are a couple of the dumbest idiots I have had the displeasure to encounter.

  39. Joey, your idiotic posts have inspired me to start a new blog "Stupid things that Joey and FAILk have Said". I'm working on the title. Keep your eyes open for it in the future when I get a little more free time. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

    Wow, look at that ANGER! Rage on Joey, Rage on. Just please don't take your short-man's syndrome out on your wife and children! They're innocent Joey!! ROFLMAO


    SOOOOOO stupid!

    You m-fers are the ones throwing stones, when you bitch about the SCOTUS decision that allows corporations and unions to purchase advertisements for politicians, while your dirty Hypocrat corruptocrats shovel the money in to their war chests from the lobbyists. Pot, kettle, glass houses, all that you dumbass!

  41. Hey Bruce What Legislation Did the Demoncrats PASS in 2009? Just Wondering!

    Sitting at a Table With PROGRESSIVES That See Their BEST Chance at Changing the Fabric of This Nation FOREVER is NOT a SEAT Conservatives or Majority of this Great Nation WANT!

    Libs, Truth is NOT Bitching its is the TRUTH and ALL Your Bitching CAN NOT Change it SO Back to Your MUSHROOM Underground,The DARK IS Your Freind!

    The Majority Are Tired of Being the Minority and NOVEMBER Will PUT This Progressive Administration Where it Belongs,IN THE PAST!

    I Wonder What Would Have Happened if Karl Rove Had Made the Comment Emanuel Made Regarding Special Need Citizens! Media Would BE in A FEEDING FRENZY Till Rove was GONE! Sad Sad
    and ASHAME!

  42. Here's a list, Al,

    * January 29, 2009: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, Pub.L. 111-2
    * February 4, 2009: Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, Pub.L. 111-3
    * February 17, 2009: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Pub.L. 111-5
    * March 11, 2009: Omnibus Appropriations Act, Pub.L. 111-8
    * March 30, 2009: Omnibus Public Land Management Act, Pub.L. 111-11
    * April 21, 2009: Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, Pub.L. 111-13
    * May 20, 2009: Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, Pub.L. 111-22
    * May 22, 2009: Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act, Pub.L. 111-23
    * May 22, 2009: Credit CARD Act, Pub.L. 111-24
    * June 22, 2009: Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, as Division A of Pub.L. 111-31
    * June 24, 2009: Supplemental Appropriations Act, including the Car Allowance Rebate System (Cash for Clunkers) Pub.L. 111-32
    * October 28, 2009: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, including the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, Pub.L. 111-84
    * November 6, 2009: Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act, Pub.L. 111-92

  43. Bruce In Other Words NOT Much!
    Childrens Health Care is Extention of BUSH Program and the Rest is MOSTLY FEEL GOOD!
    Worker Homeowner and Business Assistant Act,Is that MORE Unemployment! Why Not any Thing For Jobs Bruce The Rest is about Two Weeks of Work! What Did they Do the Rest of the Time OH I Remember NOBAMA Care!

  44. John, I'm working on a new blog too.

    "The angry fucking hypocritical lies of John" that or "see john chirp out Republican boilerplate"

    First off, you know i posted about how i dislike Edwards. You commented about things in the post, so stop with i might think Edwards is okay. Second, i don't think two wrongs make anything, but wrongs.

    Here's the part you ignore.

    The people you voted for do the things you accuse us of doing. There's your glass houses John.

    Conservatives who call liberal politicians hypocrites for doing what conservative politicians do shouldn't. (glass houses mother fucker)

    :) (just so you see i am smiling)

  45. I don't give a f**k if you type a smiley face, you're one angry bitch!

    Make your blog Joey, I can only assume it will be as well read as your angry rantings and ravings. ANGRY UNIONIST! I'm ANGRY because I have a good paying job and barely work for my pay, and I live in American and have it pretty damn good, but look at me, I'm ANGRY because the Constitution won't let me take from those greeeeedy mom and pop entrepreneurs and give to lazy-assed union workers. GGRRRRRRR! ;o)

    Well Joey, I can only go by what you write. When I write that Peters is a corrupt SOB who gets a bunch of his money from outside the state and from Big Insurance, Big Pharma, Unions, and Trial Lawyers, you counter with some guy in some other district, as if that excuses it. So ergo Joey, two wrongs make a right, or for some reason you are trying to justify bribery. So go F yourself. :0) Or better yet, why don't you join me in calling out that dirty corrupt Gary Peters! Then YOU won't be the f**king hypocrat, claiming to be pissed about a Republican doing it but not a Hypocrat! Dumbass. Oh, I forgot, you are a Unionized Hypocrat so you are a big fan of graft and corruption.

    Second, I know you voted for Edwards for VP, and I know he is a slimeball, just like all the Hypocrats. You Hypocrats know a real dirtball when you see it, and I'm really surprised you didn't push his brand of trash to be President. I guess Obummer is even slimier so that's why you went with him.

    So finally Joey, I am NOT a politician, so I cannot live in that particular glass house. Once again, I can only really have any slight impact on my dirty-assed politicians with my voice and my vote. Understand? No, of course you don't. Who in the hell gave you a GED?!?! I guess anybody can get one of those nowadays, is yours out of a crackerjack box? Well Joey, I'm sorry I don't have time to teach you all about grammar and such.


  46. JoeC My We Sound angry tonight. I Forget Did You Accuse or Did We Accuse! Joe Blog Seems Fuzzy BUT Im Still working on your GLASS House Thingy! Relax November still a Ways Off so Hold that Anger till THEN! Lets Do a "KUMBAYAH" and have a "Feel Good" Evening!

  47. Al, i'm having a blast. Not mad at all.

    John's getting his asswhupped and his lunch money taken and i am having fun.

    its really simple though. you can't come on, call Peters all the names he does, accuse him of all these things, accuse all Democrats of the same thing and have the people in his own party, the conservatives doing it just as bad.

    Its simply HYPOCRITICAL.

    I don't buy the other bullshit deflections he offers. Perhaps you do, but perhaps in scoring from home your just being biased and chickenshit. I notice that the righties here all play along Banana style, all of em in a big yellow fucking bunch.

  48. JoeC See Your Post is at 214am! Either You Cant Sleep or Your at Work! Hope its Not a Government Job cause You Got to much Time on your Hands BUT that Would Explain Alot! If your in Front of the Pewter with Nothing else to DO and Your in the BAT Cave That Explains Alot TOO! Either way Joe Calm DOWN Walk to the Light and SINCE Your always Saying it HAVE a BIG Yellow Bananna YOU Must Like Em!

  49. BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA .... Joey won't join with me in denouncing corruption of all politicians. What a LOSER! BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA

    How is it hypocritical Joey, when I say corruption of any politician is BAD and you say it is fine for the Hypocrats because a few Republicans do it?!?! ROFLMAO

    Yeah, that's quite an ass-whooping you laid down Joey, siding with corrupted politicians like Gary Peters! BWAAAHAHAHAHA OOOOOHHHH

  50. Al, Joey is right about one thing, we're ALL getting our breakfast, lunch, AND dinner money taken by these Hypocrat tax-collectors, and do-nothing libertards like Joey are having a grand time wasting our money on their regressive schemes.

  51. John, once again you attempt to distort the point. You claim that the nefarious insurance/lawyers/unions that BRIBE Gary Peters make him the MOST corrupt politician, when your politicians in your party are bribed as much or more than Gary Peters is.

    Did you miss as much or MORE? i could say it again. AS MUCH OR MORE.

    How is the Most when others have as MUCH OR MORE? Please do try to explain?

    Al, couldn't sleep. Some punks stole my stuff outta my ride. Thats what i get for living in a solid McCain county.

  52. Nonsense Joey! I said "Grow up Joey, and get a grip, and weed out the corruption wherever it is you F**KING LOSER. Way to defend a corrupt Gary Peters, the dirtiest most partisan guy we have seen in the 9th District."

    DIRTIEST MOST PARTISAN WE HAVE SEEN in the 9th District. Check it out for yourself dumbass! Once again I see I have to explain everything to you! BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA ... you STUPID F**KER. You still don't denounce corruption in either party. What a corruption-loving piece of shit you are. I SAID NOTHING ABOUT IN THE WORLD, OR IN THE COUNTRY, SO GO F**K YOURSELF JOEY.

    AND you are still saying that because the other party does it, it's acceptable for YOUR HYPOCRATS to be lying, corrupt pieces of shit. You're a champ Joey!

  53. JoeC Joe Move to a SOLID LIBERAL Community of DETROIT! Good Luck and GOD Speed JoeC!


Please keep it clean and nice. Thank you for taking the time to post you thought. It means a lot to me that you do this.