What Do You Think America Should Do To Iran Over Terrorist Plot

By the reaction of the Occupy Boston protesters they defend Iran's terrorist plot. But I'd like to know what you think we should do to Iran. Something has to be done that is for sure. If we do nothing it will just be worse for the next president and Congress to deal with. If we declare war with Iran we need to go at Iran full forced. We need to make them forget about attacking us and start worrying about rebuilding their country. Yes I said they need to rebuild their country, not us. In fact if we go to war over their attempted attack on us I want their oil. I'm getting sick and tired of these Muslim countries going after us and we end up rebuilding their country and they get to keep their oil. It's time we teach these anti-American countries that if they attack us they will no longer exist as they once were.

We don't have the money to go into any more wars right now. But that doesn't mean that we can't get the money out of their ground to pay for it. We have been running and hiding from Iran for a long time now. It doesn't work. Just like running from a bully, you have to beat the crap out of them so they never ever want to screw with you again.

This may sound harsh, but sometimes that is the only way to teach these idiot not to mess with us. They must pay for their actions. I will not support a bomb and rebuild effort in that region any more. We are the only country in the world that does that. They want a war then give it to them. We need oil and money to pay for the war they want so we must take it. Winner take all.

I don't really care what the liberals have to say about this. They have made their points about standing with terrorists at the Occupy Boston protest. We know how they feel and they care more about those that want to destroy our country then those that defend it. I don't remember any libs defending our soldiers when they did wrong. But they are all for murderers and terrorists.

We have the right to protect ourselves. Our gorvernments main job is to make sure we are protected. Doing nothing is not protecting us. Before we bomb the crap out of Iran it might be a good idea to remove all ILLEGAL Iranian immogrants. Not the legal immogrants but the ones that are breaking the law. It is too risky to keep them in this country during a war. If you don't like it then you can protest by going with them.

If any of this offends anyone, too bad. You wont cry too hard when gas is under a $1 and we don't have to pay to rebuild anything. Just remember they came after us.

Occupy Wall Street Protesters Are Pigs

A Occupy Wall Street protester camped in Zuccotti Park tries to catch a little sun on an overcast morning in the financial district in New York, Tuesday.

Is this what the left-wing calls democracy? It's bad enough that there has been so much racism and lawlessness coming out of these protests, but come on do you have to destroy everything you touch? I'm sure part of their demands will now be toilets,showers,housing and food or they will just take what they think is owed them?

This video shows how these protesters think. They go after Geraldo and he was trying to get their views on their protests. He had two liberals on to try and explain what these liberals are trying to do. I think it is obvious that these people are just a mob of unhappy liberals that want free stuff and will stop at nothing to get what they demand. Even if it is against the law or infringes on someones civil rights. Let's not forget how the liberals treated John Lewis by not letting him speak. I still can't figure why they wouldn't let a black civil rights leader speak.

We are seeing what these people will do if they ever got power in the government.

Danny Glover Calls for Warriors at Occupy LA

(Video Via HuffingtonPost)

In the clip above, actor and activist Danny Glover surprised Occupy LA demonstrators on Saturday in front of Downtown's City Hall. In the sweltering heat of the afternoon (it is certainly not fall yet in Los Angeles), Glover says participating on the weekends is not enough. “We need 24/7 warriors,” he cries out at the end of his speech.

Via the Huffington Post

"Warriors"? What do "warriors" do? So I take this as just one more call to violence and war on Americans and the private sector. Businesses and all Americans need to prepare for more of the violence coming out of these liberal lawless protests. It might not be a bad idea to get some pepper spray. They seem to go down like a ton of bricks when sprayed with it.

By CARA BUCKLEY, NY Times

Panini and Company Cafe normally sells sandwiches to tourists in Lower Manhattan and the residents nearby, but in recent days its owner, Stacey Tzortzatos, has also become something of a restroom monitor. Protesters from Occupy Wall Street, who are encamped in a nearby park, have been tromping in by the scores, and not because they are hungry.

Ms. Tzortzatos’s tolerance for the newcomers finally vanished when the sink was broken and fell to the floor. She installed a $200 lock on the bathroom to thwart nonpaying customers, angering the protesters...
Several businesses said they had no choice but to respond to the influx of protesters by closing bathrooms.
Mike Keane, who owns O’Hara’s Restaurant and Pub, said that the theft of soap and toilet paper had soared and that one protester had used the bathroom but had failed to properly use the toilet. Both Ms. Tzortzatos, owner of the Panini and Company Cafe, and Mr. Keane said the protesters rarely bought anything, yet hurled curses when they were told that only paying customers could use their bathrooms.
Steve Zamfotis, manager of another nearby store, Steve’s Pizza, said: “They are pests. They go to the bathroom and don’t even buy a cup of coffee.”

Occupy Atlanta Refuses to Allow Civil Rights Icon to Speak at Protest

‘John Lewis is Not Better Than Anyone!’ the crowd says together. No they are acting as many of us have labeled them drones. They sound just like Borg drones from Star Trek the Next Generation…. seriously!

Quite frankly I dont find what they are doing amusing its very disturbing. These people are demonstrating 1) no respect for Lewis 2) they will take direction/ orders from anyone. Who is to say they wont strike out physically and invoke violence when someone calls for it? Who is to say when one of their own who deservingly incites the police gets arrested there isnt a call to lash out at the police. Dont say it cant happen, these peoples mouths are watering for a fight! After all they mimic themselves off of the 60′s protests and we know they had their share of violence.

These people regardless of their rhetoric for violence have demonstrated they are loose cannons easily influenced to act by their handlers word. Stay clear of this folks they want conservs, TEA party ppl there to attack and blame as enablers of everything they are protesting about! You see you are tied to the GOP/repubs in their eyes and the GOP/repubs are tied to the evil bankers and corporations so its all your fault!

Let them stew and get themselves in trouble… this thing is a hornets nest!

The mob dictatorship chose to not give the Congressman the time of day because allowing him to speak was not supported by a consensus.  At 8:35 of this video from ConservARTive.com covering the disturbing quorum, the mob silences several crowd members attempting to apoligize to Rep. Lewis:

Racism at Occupy Wall Street Protest [CLEAN VERSION]

The more I see of these racist protesters the sicker they make me. That is why we need to dust off our video cameras and start filming them. When will the Democratic Party and Obama speak out about these actions that are so prevalent at these protests?

Racist Rager @ Occupy Wall St.

The Occupy Wall Street movement has adopted racist rules for speech at its nightly “General Assembly” meetings, according to which white men cannot speak unless preceded by some other type of person.

State your race, gender & sexual orientation, then maybe we'll let you speak. Later.

According to Occupy Wall Street supporter/observer “Lori“:

Occupy Wall Street’s General Assembly operates under a revolutionary “progressive stack.” A normal “stack” means those who wish to speak get in line. A progressive stack encourages women and traditionally marginalized groups speak before men, especially white men. This is something that has been in place since the beginning, it is necessary, and it is important.
“Step up, step back” was a common phrase of the first week, encouraging white men to acknowledge the privilege they have lived in their entire lives and to step back from continually speaking. This progressive stack has been inspiring and mind-boggling in its effectiveness.
[Hat tip: Matt Sledge at Huffington Post]

Is it OK to be a liberal racist as long as it's against the Jews and whites? It's all about the color of our skin to these liberals. When will they give up their hate? They hate the rich and want what they have. They want the "rich" to work and pay for their education, houses... and they think protesting is the best way to take what they want. There have been numerous signs that say, "kill the rich". They don't care about anyones rights. At what point will you and I be the target of these liberal thieves and racists?

Liberal Frances Fox Piven & Fellow Professors Indoctrinating College Students at CUNY To Get Involved and Be Ready For Violent Street Battles & Breaking Down Capitalism

The Revelation is here!
These people have fought for revolution their whole lives and they can just taste it. This is their last gasp…But it is merely a passing annoyance in American history. Just ignore the radicals, they can get no traction here, merely work up a few thousand useful idiot college idealists. This is going nowhere and they know it. Obama has made it clear that he gives his blessing to these radical protesters. Little does he know that with friends like that who needs enemies. These protesters will become more frustrated over time and that frustration will come out as terrorism and violence. The more they become unhinged the quicker their house of cards will come down. Obama has tagged himself to these radicals and it wont end pretty for them. It will become harder for the MSM to cover for the violence and lawlessness coming out of these liberal protests.

If there is a protest near you please take a video camera with you. Stand up to these thugs and speak boldly. Get them on video. Liberals have been doing this for years now. They have tried to catch the Tea Partiers acting poorly. Let's return the favor. Let's show everyone what these protests are all about. Show the racism, violence, anti-capitalism, anti-American agenda's of these protesters. Catch their rage. Ask them questions. I can't wait to hear the answers they give. And please let me know any great videos you've seen or have gotten. Liberals will destroy themselves and it is up to us to get it on video. The videos will tell the history of the left better then any text book ever could. And don't forget to have fun with these liberal simpletons.

Obama Got A Lot Of Facts Wrong In His Jobs Speech

A look at some of the claims in his news conference and how they compare with the facts:

OBAMA: “If it turns out that there are Republicans who are opposed to this bill, they need to explain to me, but more importantly to their constituencies and the American people, why they’re opposed, and what would they do.”
THE FACTS: While Republicans might not be campaigning on their opposition to Obama’s plan, they’ve hardly kept their objections a secret.
In a memorandum to House Republicans Sept. 16, House Speaker John Boehner and members of the GOP leadership said they could find common ground with Obama on the extension of certain business tax breaks, waiving a payment withholding provision for federal contractors, incentives for hiring veterans, and job training measures in connection with unemployment insurance.
They objected to new spending on public works programs, suggesting instead that Congress and the president work out those priorities in a highway spending bill. And they raised concerns about Obama’s payroll tax cuts for workers and small businesses, arguing that the benefits of a one-year tax cut would be short-lived. The memo also pointed out that reducing payroll taxes, which pay for Social Security, temporarily forces Social Security to tap the government’s general fund. And it opposed additional spending to prevent layoffs of teachers, police officers and other public workers.

—–
OBAMA: “Every idea that we’ve put forward are ones that traditionally have been supported by Democrats and Republicans alike.”
THE FACTS: Obama proposes to pay for his jobs bill by raising taxes, something traditionally opposed by Republicans and, in the form Obama proposed it, even some Democrats. Senate Democrats were so allergic to Obama’s approach, which relied largely on limiting deductions that can be taken by individuals making over $200,000 a year and couples making more than $250,000, that they’re eliminating it and replacing it with a new tax on millionaires.
In claiming bipartisan support for the components of his proposal, the president appears to be referring just to what the plan would do, not how it’s paid for, but that‘s a crucial distinction he doesn’t make.
Some of tax-cutting proposals offered by Obama have received significant Republican support in the past. But some of the new spending he proposes has received only nominal Republican backing. Evidence of bipartisanship provided by the White House includes legislation last year that provided $10 billion to prevent teacher layoffs. It won the support of only two Republican senators – Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine and among the most moderate Republicans in Congress. Another example cited by the White House was his proposal last year to offer tax breaks to businesses that hire new workers – it passed the House 217-201 with six Republican votes.
—-
OBAMA: “The answer we’re getting right now is: Well, we’re going to roll back all these Obama regulations… Does anybody really think that that is going to create jobs right now and meet the challenges of a global economy?”
THE FACTS: Well, yes, some think it will. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce last month submitted a jobs proposal to Obama that included a call to ease regulations on businesses. It specifically called for streamlining environmental reviews on major construction projects and to delay the issuance of some potentially burdensome regulations until the economy and employment have improved. In the letter, Chamber President Thomas Donohue also called on Congress to pass legislation that would require congressional approval of major regulations. The chamber did not indicate how many jobs such regulatory changes could create, but it said: “Immediate regulatory relief is required in order to begin moving $1 trillion-$2 trillion in accumulated private capital off of the sidelines and into business expansion.”
—-
OBAMA: “We can either keep taxes exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires, with loopholes that lead them to have lower tax rates, in some cases, than plumbers and teachers, or we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job.”
THE FACTS: True, “in some cases” wealthy people can exploit loopholes to make their tax rate lower than for people of middle or low income. In recent rhetoric, Obama had suggested it was commonplace for rich people to pay lower rates than others, a claim not supported by IRS statistics. But on Thursday, Obama accurately stated that it only happens sometimes.
In 2009, 1,470 households filed tax returns with incomes above $1 million yet paid no federal income tax, according to the IRS. Yet that was less than 1 percent of returns with incomes above $1 million. On average, taxpayers who made $1 million or more paid 24.4 percent of their income in federal income taxes; those making $100,000 to $125,000 paid 9.9 percent; those making $50,000 to $60,000 paid 6.3 percent. The White House argues that when payroll taxes – paid only on the first $106,800 of wages – are factored in, more middle class workers wind up with a higher tax rate than millionaires.
—
OBAMA: “China has been very aggressive in gaming the trading system to its advantage and to the disadvantage of other countries, particularly the United States. …. And currency manipulation is one example of it, or at least intervening in the currency markets in ways that have led their currency to be valued lower than the market would normally dictate. And that makes their exports cheaper and that makes our exports to them more expensive.”
THE FACTS: While Obama complained about China’s efforts to keeps its currency undervalued to gain trade advantages, his administration has repeatedly refused to brand China as a currency manipulator in a report that the Treasury Department is required to send to Congress twice a year.
Such a designation would trigger negotiations between the two countries and could ultimately lead to U.S. trade sanctions against China.
The administration has been reluctant to brand China a currency manipulator, as have past administrations, because the United States depends on China to buy U.S. Treasury securities to help finance America’s budget deficits. China owns $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, making it the largest foreign holder of Treasury debt.

The fact is Republicans aren't the only ones that don't like Obama's jobs bill. Democrats in both houses of congress don't like it either. Many Democrats on Capitol Hill appear far from sold that the president has the right antidote to spur major job growth and turn around their party’s political fortunes.

Here is what some Democratic Party leaders are saying. “Terrible,” Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) told POLITICO when asked about the president’s ideas for how to pay for the $450 billion price tag. “We shouldn’t increase taxes on ordinary income. … There are other ways to get there.”

“That offset is not going to fly, and he should know that,” said Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu from the energy-producing Louisiana, referring to Obama’s elimination of oil and gas subsidies. “Maybe it’s just for his election, which I hope isn’t the case.”
“I think the best jobs bill that can be passed is a comprehensive long-term deficit-reduction plan,” said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), discussing proposals to slash the debt by $4 trillion by overhauling entitlement programs and raising revenue through tax reforms. “That’s better than everything else the president is talking about — combined.”
And those are just the moderates in the party. Some liberals also have concerns.
“There is serious discomfort with potentially setting up Social Security as a fall guy because you’re taking this contribution out,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona, referring to Obama’s proposal to further slash payroll taxes.

If Obama can't even get his own party in line for this jobs bill how can he blame it all on Republicans? That is just crazy talk as far as I'm concerned. But that's the Obama way I guess.

Obama Backs Wall Street Violent Protesters

“Obviously, I’ve heard of it. I’ve seen it on television,” he said. “I think it expresses the frustrations that the American people feel. That we had the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. Huge collateral damage all throughout the country, all across Main Street. And yet, you’re still seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us in this problem in the first place.”
See his response below:

Obama refused to condemn any of the protesters actions (despite multiple altercations with police and arrests) and said they are just expressing their frustrations. That sounds to me like he stands with these lawless liberal warriors on Wall Street. Why in the world didn't Obama take the time to tell his liberal supporters to calm down and keep the law for a change? Is he afraid they might turn on him next? Are these supporters of Obama's really worth it? This isn't about doing what is best for the Obama campaign. It's time he does what is best for the country as a whole. He doesn't have to tell them to go home. But he should tell them to obey the law and give up the terrorism and violence.
 (CONTENT WARNING for strong language):

This is some of the racism coming out of these liberal protesters. Why can't Democrats speak out about this racism?

Democrat-Backed ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Protests Turn Violent Again

Protesters from an anti-Wall Street march are arrested and pepper sprayed as they tried to march to Wall Street Wednesday night.

Can the main stream media still say that these protests are peaceful and get away with this lie? This is real violence not the make believe violence the left said the Tea Party was.  It's time the the Democratic Party leaders speak out about this violence coming from their side. Obama, with his class warfare rhetoric started this and he needs to take control of it. That is unless this is what he wanted to begin with. He is a community agitator by trade and that is what he did best.

Obama also needs to speak out about his ilk making threats of terrorism on the NYSE on Oct.10. This isn't what democracy looks like and the Democratic Party needs to do something about it.

I also think Wall Street needs to do something about the Democratic Party backed protesters. The best thing they can is cut off the Democratic Party funding. Wall Street gives more money to the Democratic Party by far then the Republican Party. Wall Street needs to cut them off.

The fact is Obama and the Democratic Party bailed out Wall Street, not main street. But the mindless protesters somehow haven't figured that out. The protesters also haven't figured out that our national debt was raised by the Democratic Party. The young protesters need to realize that it is their generation that will get stuck with the bill. Democrats want to keep spending their money, while Republicans want to cut spending and pay down that debt now, not the next few generations.

The fact is these protesters have a right to protest in a legal way. They can say whatever they want, and they do. But if they keep going this route of violence and lawlessness our jailes will just get more full of liberals. It's time we start looking at the fact that these protesters are becoming more violent and it is the Democratic Parties fault. If this is the "Hope and Change" they were looking for than vote for Obama. But if you don't like the direction of this country then vote him out of office.

Obama and the Democratic Party set their minion free and told them what to do. This is their bad and they need to fix it. Hiding from reality wont make it go away. As Americans start to realize that this is Obama's doing and that he started this mess with his class warfare rhetoric people will start to bail from the Democratic Party in droves. Who in their right mind would want to be associated with these kinds of people. They call themselves the 99%. How is it that most Americans don't stand with them? Find one poll that says otherwise.

The good news is these violent protesters are taking Obama and the Democratic Party down with them. People know which Party stands with them. As they become more and more violent and lawless with threats of economic terrorism people start putting the pieces together. It isn't just by chance that Obama's approval numbers keep going down. They see what is happening and they blame him, not Republican for this mess. Obama has never ever had to clean up his own mess when he was community organizing. He just steered the pot and let someone else do the work of cleaning it up. We don't need any more steering the pot and class warfare. We need solutions to the problems. We need a leader. Having violent protests demanding that the top 1% of money earners give their money to the other 99% isn't a real or lasting solution. It is theft. If these people put as much effort into working for their own money rather then trying to take from the "rich" we would all be better off. It's just a matter of time before these takers just start stealing what they think is theirs. If this is their ideology, and it is, the jailes are the right place for them.