Climategate Another "Created" Thing By The Democrats

But if you want a really good example of how deeply polarized the issue is, take a look at these TV exchanges. In the first, George Will says the C.R.U. material shows the scientists “suppressing criticism, gaming the peer-review process, and all the rest,” while Paul Krugman states “There’s nothing in there”:

And in this conversation between Stuart Varney and Ed Begley Jr. — well, hold on to your hat:

Many blogs covering the topic are just as bombastic. The most prominent

The World Is Coming To An End

The world is coming to an end. The North and South poles are melting. The world is going to flood again even though God said he wouldn't do that again. We need to act now. Everyone needs to send the Democrats everything they have to save the planet. Only we can contol the weather of the planet and only we can stop the distruction that is coming from MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING. It is the worse thing to ever happen and the costs will be outragous but well worth it. The polar bear are dieing faster then ever even though there are more polar bears now then over the last 100 years. Now we know all this is a lie and so did they. I feel bad for those poor people that put there reputations on the line because the science was a lie. Al Gore knew it that is why he has a carbon footprint the size of Texas. Some idiots even went out to by an electric Japanese car because they believed those liberal lies. It seems like the Democrats were in on it as they had the most to gain from the new economy they would create because of MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING. We conservatives have been trying to tell these sheeple but they wouldn't listen. They said the ski was falling and when we said it wasn't they called us names. Now don't you all look the fool? The debate isn't over and the Democrats have been caught with their hands in the climategate jar. This is a big hoax for profit by the Democrat for the Democrats. We conservatives were the ones trying to bring cooler heads to the debate while the Democrats wanted to stop the debate and Tax the crap put of us taxpayers for their profit. We need to teach these crooks a leason. What do you think we should do about this lie of a lifetime? Why isn't the media covering it for the news that it is? Are they in on it and how high up and how broad does this scam go? We the people need to start looking at all the science and make sure we aren't being lied to on other things.

The True Face Of War

More Babies That Needed Some Love

MALACHI CARD - BACK SIDE 7TH WEEK CARD - FRONT SIDE 7TH WEEK CARD - BACK SIDE CHOICE IS CARD - FRONT SIDE CHOICE IS CARD - BACK SIDE

Happy Birthday Baby

Suction Aspiration – First 12 weeks of pregnancy

This is what remains of a baby destroyed by a suction aspiration abortion. Suction aspiration, or "vacuum curettage," is the abortion technique used

Is Abortion A God Given Right?

Added to
Quicklist 3:45

late term abortion

late term abortion

This is a video I made for my Bioethics class....I would like some input on this video....

   Apparently, they held an anti-Stupak rally yesterday in D.C. in an effort to sway the Senate’s deliberations on Obamacare.  You may not have heard about it because no almost no one came.  In any event, at this rally, some sad excuse for an alleged Christian minister made the following statement:

“Don’t let anybody tell you that religious people don’t support choice,” [Carlton] Veazy said, according to CNS News. “You not only have a constitutional right for abortion, but you have a God-given right.”

   First of all, haven’t we been told for years that when ministers suggest that God is opposed to abortion, this is evidence of a dangerous creeping theocracy?  I haven’t heard any of these same logically challenged moral midgets make a peep about this kind of rhetoric on the pro-abortion side.
Second, where, exactly, does this guy get his information that there’s a “God-given” right to an abortion? It certainly isn’t in the Bible.  It isn’t in any recognized religious tradition I’ve ever heard of (and I am at least relatively well-versed on this subject).  Apparently, this “minister” Veazy feels that he has the plenary power to declare what God-given rights are, based on whatever he feels politically at the moment.  In this case, he has declared, based on his (self-professed) ultimate authority to speak on behalf of God Almighty, that God has given women an inherent right to kill children growing in their wombs.
   Memo to Carlton Veazy: the Christianity you profess to believe in already has an authoritative text, and it contains passages like James 3:1 that you might want to revisit in your spare time.  Of course, you don’t have to believe in Christanity, God, or the Bible, but if you accept the basic premise of your stated faith (that being ultimate accountability to God on Judgment Day), you might want to be a little more careful of presuming to make false moral pronouncements on His behalf.

This Is The Detroit Anti War Protest. Are They All Racists/Hatemongers?

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

 

Reverend Ed Rowe calls on the faith community in a misguided attempt to inject religion into it.

The Left Start Their Attacks On Obama

---

---

The anti-war left is turning on the president it helped put into office, launching a counteroffensive against President Obama's decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan.

Activist groups are joining liberal members of Congress in condemning the president's expected announcement on Tuesday that he will order roughly 30,000 more troops to the war zone as part of an overhauled strategy to finish what President Bush started eight years ago. Some are urging him not to go through with it -- though the strategy apparently is set in stone, with Obama having issued his final orders to his generals Sunday evening.

"I simply can't believe you're about to do what they say you are going to do," documentary filmmaker Michael Moore said in an open letter to Obama posted on his Web site. Moore warned that Obama would tarnish his legacy, turn away his supporters and effectively crown himself the new "war president" by escalating the war in Afghanistan.

"With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics," Moore wrote. "Your potential decision to expand the war ... will do more to set your legacy in stone than any of the great things you've said and done in your first year.

"For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the future of our nation, stop. For God's sake, stop," Moore wrote.  

 

Such warnings speak to the deep divide the president will face Tuesday night when he announces his strategy during a speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y. Many Americans have grown weary of the war effort, and some regard the Afghan government as a hopelessly corrupt partner that will undermine U.S. military efforts there. Others hold Obama's stated view that Afghanistan is the right war and must be pursued to prevent the region from becoming an international staging ground for more terrorist attacks.

Obama highlighted his opposition to the Iraq war, not the Afghanistan war, during his presidential campaign. He repeatedly criticized his top Democratic primary opponent, Hillary Clinton, for voting in favor of the Iraq war, and he held up his own opposition to that war as a state senator in Illinois as a sign of his foreign policy judgment.

Now the groups that cheered him for opposing the Iraq war are blasting him for diverting military resources back to Afghanistan.

MoveOn.org, which broke its tradition of not intervening in the Democratic primary process to endorse Obama over Clinton during the campaign, has urged members to send messages to the White House voicing their opposition to the troop increase.

"President Obama is poised to make a critical decision about the Afghanistan war in the next few weeks. He needs to hear that we need an exit strategy -- not tens of thousands more troops stuck in a quagmire," the group's Web site says.

The activist group Code Pink is urging people to protest and hold vigils before, during and after Obama's speech. The group asked Obama to "stop the surge" and begin withdrawing troops.

While Republicans in Congress expressed dismay that Obama took three months to reach a decision on Afghanistan strategy, some Democratic members of Congress are siding with the anti-war groups in saying it's time to wind down U.S. involvement in Afghanistan.

Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., who has called for a new tax to pay for the escalation, has made clear he's opposed to Obama's strategy.

"The problem is that you can have the best policy in the world, but if you don't have the tools to implement it, it isn't worth a beanbag. And I don't think we have the tools in the Pakistani government and I don't think we have the tools in the Afghan government. And until we do, I think much of what we do is a fool's errand," Obey told CNN on Sunday.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Sunday that while the administration cannot bring the troops home "tomorrow," it should seek more international cooperation.

"I've got a real problem about expanding this war where the rest of the world is sitting around and saying, 'isn't it a nice thing that the taxpayers of the United States and the U.S. military are doing the work that the rest of the world should be doing'?" he said on ABC's "This Week."

And Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a leading skeptic of a surge-style strategy, said Sunday that the administration needs to focus more on building the Afghan army.

"I favored additional trainers. I have favored a real surge in equipment. But the key here is an Afghan surge, not an American surge," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation," questioning whether more U.S. troops could do anything to increase the number of Afghan forces.

But the White House is trying to assure both sides of the debate, offering the troop increase while placing renewed emphasis on an exit strategy.

"This is not an open-ended commitment," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday.

WW II Battleship sailor tells Obama to shape up or ship out !

 

 

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii

for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes

all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body,

he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now.

He dictated this letter  to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

 

Dear President Obama,     

         

     My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year.  People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

 

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate.  Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

 

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

 

So here goes.

 

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

 

I can't figure out what country you are the president of.

You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

             " We're no longer a Christian nation"

             " America is arrogant" - (Your wife even

                 announced to the world,"America is mean-

                 spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching

                 that nonsense to 23 generations of our

                 war dead buried all over the globe who

                 died for no other reason than to free a

                 whole lot of strangers from tyranny and

                 hopelessness.)

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you.  To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

 

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

 

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?  Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?  I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

 

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination.  You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

 

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

 

Shape up and start acting like an American.  If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue.  You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

 

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts, who was putting up a fight?  You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

 

One more thing.  I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son.  Do your job.  When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him.  But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out.  The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

 

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president. 

You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy.  That's not our greatest threat.  Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle.

 

Sincerely,

Harold B. Estes

 

When a 95 year old hero of the "the Greatest Generation"

stands up and speaks out like this, I think we owe it

to him to send his words to as many Americans as

we can. Please pass it on.